TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Two-parent households should be a policy goal

88 点作者 4AoZqrH2fsk5UB超过 1 年前

18 条评论

noteflakes超过 1 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;na61F" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;na61F</a>
fasthands9超过 1 年前
I can&#x27;t read the whole article but remember learning in the past that children of widows have outcomes more similar to two-parent households than divorced parent households. This would seem to suggest the divorce is more of a signal of family&#x2F;status than something which is driving bad outcomes.<p>At the same time, I do think people have gone a bit too far in their want to not give anyone shame. Yes - some shame is not going to help single-parent households now but I would think some societal shame would prevent people from being reckless with having kids or maybe make people think twice about leaving their partner when it really is just a rough patch.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jstor.org&#x2F;stable&#x2F;1566757" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jstor.org&#x2F;stable&#x2F;1566757</a>
评论 #37559354 未加载
评论 #37560269 未加载
评论 #37559412 未加载
评论 #37635615 未加载
评论 #37567208 未加载
评论 #37564105 未加载
评论 #37558362 未加载
评论 #37560087 未加载
_greim_超过 1 年前
The problem with two-parent is you&#x27;re a single misstep away from one-parent. Multi-generational and communal households would be more resilient, and easier to accommodate via tax incentives and housing policy.
评论 #37557472 未加载
blargey超过 1 年前
Flipping the script from &quot;both parents working to stay afloat&quot; to &quot;a stay at home parent in every home&quot; takes strong financial incentives.<p>But the stronger the incentives to start and keep such parental arrangements, the stronger the forces keeping dysfunctional and harmful relationships together, at the expense of everyone involved. People fought for divorce for a reason, that needs to be addressed somehow.
评论 #37557859 未加载
ahf8Aithaex7Nai超过 1 年前
How do we know that the causal relationship is this way and not the other way around, if there is one at all? Raising children and generating income at the same time requires teamwork in most cases. That&#x27;s immediately obvious, and there&#x27;s probably not much more to it than that.
bbor超过 1 年前
Serious question: why not three parent? Does every stable relationship involve sexual aspects? Seems like an article stating an obvious fact but missing the bigger picture
评论 #37557169 未加载
评论 #37557238 未加载
评论 #37557161 未加载
评论 #37558801 未加载
评论 #37557156 未加载
评论 #37559107 未加载
评论 #37557897 未加载
评论 #37557164 未加载
评论 #37557247 未加载
评论 #37558824 未加载
评论 #37559201 未加载
评论 #37558018 未加载
评论 #37557105 未加载
评论 #37557399 未加载
abeppu超过 1 年前
I find it interesting&#x2F;surprising that the word &quot;divorce&quot; never appears in this article. My understanding was that the divorce rate also was lower for college-educated people. I&#x27;m also surprised by lack of mentions of family planning -- are single parents without college educations actively choosing to be parents or tripping into it?<p>But overall, this seems circuitous. The author acknowledges that inequality is both a cause and effect interacting with marriage, and cites several ways that kids are better off in two-parent families -- but the description of those comparisons makes no mention of controlling for these other factors. So one can have a lot of skepticism that a poor two-parent household, where both parents need to work long hours or multiple jobs to cover rent, where housing is less stable, where surprising costs (a broken-down car etc) turn into catastrophic disruptions, will turn out healthy successful kids. But the finding that kids do better in two parent families already selects out a number of metrics -- educational attainment, future earnings, lower rate of getting in trouble at school or with law enforcement - all of which are desirable irrespective of family structure. Those seem like better goals, which we are already pursuing just relatively ineffectively.<p>You want more kids to go to college? Make college cheaper, make colleges spend more money on instruction and less on administration and coaches.<p>Want kids to have fewer behavioral issues at school? Well, stuff that could make their home life more stable whether their parents are married or not may include safe, affordable, stable housing, and IDK, schools that don&#x27;t have to do active shooter drills b&#x2F;c of the real threat of being invaded by a well-armed crazy person might be nice.<p>Want kids to grow up to earn more? I think Piketty&#x27;s focus on the share of growth that goes to capital versus labor is important. Generational wage stagnation in real terms is still critical.<p>Want kids to get in trouble with the law less? In my city, the police did a mass arrest of hundreds of kids skateboarding recently. No one&#x27;s top concern about crime here is &quot;too many kids are skateboarding&quot;. Maybe law enforcement should focus more on e.g. corrupt local officials, employers with systemic wage theft, landlords dangerously skipping repairs and maintenance, etc etc rather than kids on skateboards?
评论 #37560394 未加载
2OEH8eoCRo0超过 1 年前
There was an excellent NYT article about this as well:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;09&#x2F;13&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;single-parent-poverty.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;09&#x2F;13&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;single-parent-pov...</a><p>&gt; We are often reluctant to acknowledge one of the significant drivers of child poverty — the widespread breakdown of family — for fear that to do so would be patronizing or racist.
评论 #37557400 未加载
评论 #37557801 未加载
Dig1t超过 1 年前
&gt;The scholar to whom the question was directed looked annoyed and struggled to formulate an answer. The panelists shifted in their seats. The moderator stepped in, quickly pointing out that poverty makes it harder for people to form stable marriages. She promptly called on someone else.<p>If we valued free speech more, we might be able to have more open, honest conversations in the public realm here.<p>In a society where people are easily fired, or have their lives disrupted in other ways, for expressing the wrong opinion or saying the wrong thing, there is no upside to having this conversation. The only rational decision is to ignore the question and move on.<p>The fewer conversations we have, the less likely we are to be able to solve problems.
评论 #37561578 未加载
ZoomerCretin超过 1 年前
&gt; To give disadvantaged children better futures, policy makers should promote widespread employment and economic security among a wider segment of the population—particularly non-college-educated men.<p>And therein lies the problem. We&#x27;ve seen for years how every call for minimum wage increases or labor rights is met with &quot;You&#x27;re only worth what the market will bear. If you want more money and better treatment, you&#x27;d better make yourself worth more to the market!&quot;, yet when the shoe is on the other foot, and the labor market favors workers, policymakers treat it as an _emergency_ requiring immediate correction. Unemployment expansion was cancelled at the state level (despite evidence that people on unemployment assistance find work faster), employers strongly resisted any call for wage increases or working condition improvements, opting to whine &quot;No one wants to work anymore&quot; to anyone who would listen, and the Federal Reserve started hiking rates as quickly as it could despite little evidence that inflation was caused by anything other than supply chain difficulties.<p>The unspoken yet universal policy preference of our governments is to weaken and impoverish workers to the greatest extent possible to ensure enough of us are compliant and desperate enough to take any job at any wage.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=_K1tqDyN4xE">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=_K1tqDyN4xE</a><p>Tim Gurner was recently excoriated for saying the quiet part out loud from the perspective of the rich and powerful: &quot;The governments around the world are trying to increase unemployment&quot; so we can have less &quot;arrogance&quot; from workers.
评论 #37578349 未加载
michaelleland超过 1 年前
The tax credits for married people here in the US seem to be part of this type of policy, no?
评论 #37556980 未加载
评论 #37556968 未加载
评论 #37557036 未加载
评论 #37557255 未加载
评论 #37556985 未加载
评论 #37557551 未加载
dingi超过 1 年前
In other words, invest more in men. Years of neglection on their education and up bringing, downright ignoring the needs of young&#x2F;adult males. And you wonder why the family situation is fucked up. This is a symptom of the end of western civilization. Populations are on the decline. If you don&#x27;t have strong men, they will come from outside. Just don&#x27;t expect them to hold on to your fucked up &quot;values&quot;.
bradlys超过 1 年前
I think the biggest contributor we can do is change culture to where women are not looking for significant financial benefit when marrying a man.<p>As it stands, men already don’t look at women for their financial prospects like women do towards men. If we can change this aspect of our culture, I think this will give to one of the largest rises in two parent households.<p>I don’t expect it to ever change though.
pjc50超过 1 年前
Can&#x27;t read the article even with archive.ph, but do they have an analysis of why relationships break down?
评论 #37557216 未加载
评论 #37557401 未加载
评论 #37557137 未加载
评论 #37559222 未加载
NoMoreNicksLeft超过 1 年前
I don&#x27;t think that&#x27;s been sociologically plausible for many decades. Some things are easy to tear down and nearly impossible to build back up.<p>In some circles, the mere suggestion that this should be a policy goal is insulting, as it hints that single-parent homes are inferior. Our government isn&#x27;t really allowed to prefer one over the other, even if it would result in less misery.<p>Furthermore, the tools that government has at its disposal to encourage two-parent households are few and clumsy. No decision to stay together has ever hinged on a slightly higher tax exemption, or some other priority access to the bureaucracy.<p>The writer&#x27;s room of some Hollywood sitcom has more power than Congress in these matters. I doubt very much that they are interested in giving up on the show that makes jokes that discourage such, but even if they did, that&#x27;s one show when the real culprit is the entire weight of the entertainment industry.<p>We might as well talk about how it should be a policy goal to raise the speed of light to 750,000 miles per second.
评论 #37557431 未加载
评论 #37557387 未加载
评论 #37557207 未加载
baq超过 1 年前
People don&#x27;t want to have children because:<p>1) they can&#x27;t afford it, or<p>2) they don&#x27;t have a reasonable apartment&#x2F;home (same thing as 1. really)<p>3) they don&#x27;t want to give up their lifestyle<p>4) they&#x27;re genuinely afraid the future is dystopian and dark (which is rather interesting since I can&#x27;t imagine a future more dystopian than one without children)<p>So if you want to fix the society to want to have children again you have to make it<p>1) affordable,<p>2) less inconvenient,<p>3) (not really sure what to do about being afraid of the future)<p>if that sounds like socialism... too bad. Capitalism evidently makes people prefer capital (both money and time) over children.
评论 #37557674 未加载
评论 #37557611 未加载
评论 #37557704 未加载
评论 #37561422 未加载
评论 #37560862 未加载
a-user-you-like超过 1 年前
Nothing better than a father and mother in a stable, loving relationship for a child. Yes, let’s encourage this.
评论 #37557309 未加载
评论 #37557375 未加载
评论 #37557368 未加载
评论 #37557479 未加载
matthewfelgate超过 1 年前
The 1970s called; they&#x27;d like their arguments back!<p>Arguing that children with married parents fare better, thus promoting two-parent families, is akin to suggesting that since blue cars have fewer accidents, everyone should drive a blue car.<p>Pressuring dissatisfied couples to stay together or marry benefits no one.<p>The article fails to provide actionable recommendations on promoting marriage.
评论 #37557417 未加载
评论 #37557396 未加载
评论 #37557336 未加载
评论 #37557718 未加载
评论 #37557411 未加载
评论 #37557466 未加载
评论 #37557329 未加载
评论 #37557328 未加载
评论 #37557283 未加载