TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

UK Parliament passes Online Safety Bill

194 点作者 phab超过 1 年前

23 条评论

skilled超过 1 年前
Relevant,<p><i>ORG warns of threat to privacy and free speech as Online Safety Bill is passed</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.openrightsgroup.org&#x2F;press-releases&#x2F;org-warns-of-threat-to-privacy-and-free-speech-as-online-safety-bill-is-passed&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.openrightsgroup.org&#x2F;press-releases&#x2F;org-warns-of-...</a><p>&gt; Open Rights Group has warned that Online Safety Bill, which has been passed in parliament, will make us less secure by threatening our privacy and undermining our freedom of expression. This includes damaging the privacy and security of children and young people the law is supposed to protect.<p>Also other noteworthy discussions on HN,<p><i>Your compliance obligations under the UK’s Online Safety Bill</i> (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32055756">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32055756</a>) (July 2022 | 462 comments)<p><i>Signal says it&#x27;ll shut down in UK if Online Safety Bill approved</i> (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34936127">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34936127</a>) (February 2023 | 302 comments)<p><i>The Online Safety Bill: An attack on encryption</i> (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34727082">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34727082</a>) (February 2023 | 179 comments)<p><i>Ask HN: Online activities to be made impossible by the UK Online Safety Bill</i> (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36919175">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36919175</a>) (July 2023 | 105 comments)<p><i>Google&#x27;s Statement on the UK Online Safety Bill [pdf]</i> (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37443634">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37443634</a>) (September 2023 | 47 comments)<p><i>UK pulls back from clash with Big Tech over private messaging</i> (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37408196">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37408196</a>) (September 2023 | 302 comments)
评论 #37576143 未加载
pickleoctopus25超过 1 年前
This is genuinely terrible for people living in the UK who care about their privacy and freedom on the internet.<p>I do wonder whether this bill was caused by sincere misunderstanding of how tech works on the part of the legislators or, more cynically, a government agenda to crush privacy on the internet. Either way, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
评论 #37610464 未加载
LightBug1超过 1 年前
Yes ... because we&#x27;ve seen how well regulators have managed everything else in the UK ...<p>Water? Energy? Everything else?<p>Man, this is going to be fantastic ...<p>The UK has an problem with regulation ... amongst everything else in this sh!thole.
评论 #37578046 未加载
cwales95超过 1 年前
Now this is a headline I didn&#x27;t want to see pass. I wonder if Apple will do what they said and pull iMessage and FaceTime. Same with Meta and WhatsApp.
评论 #37576653 未加载
评论 #37576634 未加载
kulahan超过 1 年前
The bill makes sites prove they are committed to removing content:<p>* promoting or facilitating suicide<p>* promoting self-harm<p>Serious question - how will this affect discussions around euthanasia? Can people just not discuss that online in the UK anymore?
评论 #37577831 未加载
评论 #37581378 未加载
评论 #37583487 未加载
评论 #37577756 未加载
gustavus超过 1 年前
&quot;Good evening, London.<p>Allow me first to apologize for this interruption. I do, like many of you, appreciate the comforts of everyday routine, the security of the familiar, the tranquillity of repetition. I enjoy them as much as any bloke.<p>But in the spirit of commemoration, whereby those important events of the past, usually associated with someone&#x27;s death or the end of some awful bloody struggle, are celebrated with a nice holiday, I thought we could mark this November the fifth, a day that is sadly no longer remembered, by taking some time out of our daily lives to sit down and have a little chat. There are, of course, those who do not want us to speak. I suspect even now, orders are being shouted into telephones, and men with guns will soon be on their way.<p>Why? Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn&#x27;t there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission.<p>How did this happen? Who&#x27;s to blame? Well, certainly, there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, truth be told, if you&#x27;re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn&#x27;t be? War, terror, disease. They were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you, and in your panic, you turned to the now high chancellor, Adam Sutler. He promised you order, he promised you peace, and all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent. Last night, I sought to end that silence.<p>Last night, I destroyed the Old Bailey to remind this country of what it has forgotten. More than four hundred years ago, a great citizen wished to embed the fifth of November forever in our memory. His hope was to remind the world that fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words; they are perspectives. So if you&#x27;ve seen nothing, if the crimes of this government remain unknown to you, then I would suggest that you allow the fifth of November to pass unmarked. But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek, then I ask you to stand beside me, one year from tonight, outside the gates of Parliament, and together we shall give them a fifth of November that shall never, ever be forgot.&quot; - V
评论 #37582602 未加载
评论 #37582098 未加载
IYasha超过 1 年前
Welcome to the goolag, comrades. As sad as it sounds. This stuff is emerging in &lt;s&gt;WEF&lt;&#x2F;s&gt;different countries almost simultaneously. Do you see the pattern here? I do. Freakin prison under disguise of safety.
评论 #37581897 未加载
mattlondon超过 1 年前
I wonder if this sort of thing would lead to more people self-hosting again since it seems to be targeted at &quot;big tech&quot;.<p>So because Facebook, tiktok, YouTube et al start over-censoring, people just think fuck it and start hosting their own content again?
评论 #37577557 未加载
评论 #37576417 未加载
评论 #37577040 未加载
评论 #37581745 未加载
评论 #37576853 未加载
DerekBickerton超过 1 年前
I hope other countries don&#x27;t copy the UK. With the Internet we have choice of jurisdiction and can happily avoid any cryptography projects operating out of the UK. I don&#x27;t care if WhatsApp will become wiretapped in the UK. My beloved Matrix operates out of there, that&#x27;s what concerns me.<p>And I have to use WhatsApp because of its network effect (all my friends and family are on it). I have tried recruiting them on to Signal and Matrix, but the mental fatigue for them of doing that; means I have only have three friends on Signal, and <i>~100s</i> stuck on shitty WhatsApp.<p>Hopefully the more tech savvy friends of mine will ditch WhatsApp and choose Signal. And I&#x27;m not saying Signal doesn&#x27;t have its issues (meatspace identity tied to your number etc) but it&#x27;s far superior to WhatsApp which collects too much metadata like, it knows your contacts, when you talk to them, IP and other metadata.<p>Does anyone else have this issue of recruiting friends and family onto more privacy-respecting messenger apps?
评论 #37577286 未加载
评论 #37588611 未加载
评论 #37578082 未加载
pickleoctopus超过 1 年前
This is genuinely terrible for people living in the UK who care about their privacy and freedom on the internet.<p>I do wonder whether this bill was caused by sincere misunderstanding of how tech works on the part of the legislators or, more cynically, a government agenda to crush privacy on the internet. Either way, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
评论 #37576866 未加载
Jigsy超过 1 年前
I am personally curious to see if Signal will honor their promise to leave the UK or if Meredith was simply blowing smoke.
dwroberts超过 1 年前
Does anyone have a link to the full text of the bill? The House of Lords site only seems to list the amendments without context.<p>I’m interested to know if it passed with the (ridiculous) requirement of a third party age verification service
评论 #37577219 未加载
评论 #37577182 未加载
octacat超过 1 年前
Oh, we had something like that in Russia, they&#x27;ve extended the list after. Also &quot;to protect children&quot; initially. Once you have a convenient framework, it could be useful to remove any info the government does not want. The next step would be declaring some organisations and groups as &quot;harmful&quot; and removing their info.
Affric超过 1 年前
It’s interesting.<p>This gigantic legislation is misconceived at the same time I think it’s easy to see why it has been deemed electorally popular enough for the government to proceed with.<p>Tech companies do not provide a carriage service. It’s something more than that. The behaviours they permitted, and even encouraged, on their platforms have incurred large amounts of harm on individuals and society as a whole.<p>There can be no compromise on the government with encryption but they are able to do this because online companies are yet to figure out how to best protect the vulnerable that use their services.<p>With that said I think the existence of the unregulated internet was likely anomalous. If ever you wanted privacy, you always have had to ensure the only two beings with access to the information communicated were yourself and the intended recipient. Is it really possible for a society to permit the existence of any large organisation for private communication without eavesdropping?
评论 #37577515 未加载
评论 #37577466 未加载
HeckFeck超过 1 年前
Going to buy shares in VPN providers.<p>Seriously though, this just feels like the walls closing in on the freedom we had online. There’s no way these powers won’t be extended into more surveillance and censorship generally, now that they’re in the door. We all lose.<p>And it won’t make the lives better for miserable children whom this bill is supposed to help - if anything, by controlling online content more they have even fewer places to reach out and find help without ‘somebody watching’.<p>The children prone to “online harms” will just find another outlet, and the parents (probably responsible for their misery in the first place) will switch to blaming that and demanding legislation to control it. Rinse and repeat.
评论 #37576872 未加载
netdoll超过 1 年前
I wonder if there will be any substantial increase in pedojacketing among cultural elites towards those they see as undesirables now that the bill is passed, or whether the second order effects of the bill will lead to a backlash against the existing proliferation of it from the young, globally connected, and tech savvy populations still remaining in Britain after the depredations of the last decade.
mhandley超过 1 年前
If there is a plus side, I guess it will be that it will teach all our teenagers the importance of using a VPN.
Zuiii超过 1 年前
I can&#x27;t help but feel sorry for the children and the adults of the UK. People around the world will mostly ignore this bill (and rightfully so) but the people living there will have to live with this broad, poorly defined mess.
t0bia_s超过 1 年前
So what will happen if I&#x27;ll travel in UK and use Signal or Element on my phone with VPN?
评论 #37581478 未加载
jacooper超过 1 年前
They didn&#x27;t ban E2E, did they?
评论 #37577962 未加载
flanked-evergl超过 1 年前
UK is all in on Dystopia.
concordDance超过 1 年前
The title of this post is broken. @dang?
评论 #37576047 未加载
jimnotgym超过 1 年前
I don&#x27;t know why the UK bothers to make new laws. It has no hope of enforcing them. The Police are mired in scandal and cut to the bone. The courts system is taking apart, with criminal barristers forced to strike for pay, courts closed and massive backlogs in both the criminal and civil branches. Prisons are full, and taking apart. A terrorist on remand escaped last week.<p>What are they possibly going to do with yet another law?<p>Edit: spelling.I use a swipe keyboard on my phone due to arthritis, and weird misspellings are a side effect. Sorry to the pedant below who couldn&#x27;t see past one typo well enough to address the point.
评论 #37576297 未加载
评论 #37576621 未加载
评论 #37576601 未加载
评论 #37576949 未加载
评论 #37576448 未加载
评论 #37580604 未加载
评论 #37576419 未加载
评论 #37576291 未加载
评论 #37576357 未加载