TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A year of lying about Nord Stream

18 点作者 haltingproblem超过 1 年前

3 条评论

redder23超过 1 年前
I can hardly think of any better example on how much the legacy media has fallen than with how they treat Sy Hersh. They applauded him, they had high respect for him, they were always willing to offer him the front page for his superb investigative reporting ...<p>The fact that he had to go to Substack to publish the Nordstream investigation and that they all ran hitpieces on him as soon as he came out with this is such a clear display or how disconnected they are and how they are nothing more but government propaganda. They all turned on him, they acted like he was a different person now. A clear sign of the disconnect of the legacy media and how they are dying. Only government mouthpieces who want to work in legacy media now, all the truth tellers are working for alternative media now or self publish like Hersh does. And I am not complaining, goood riddance! We need no editor and other gatekeepers who bury important stories, who check back with the government if its OK to post or ask for edits from them. Who instantly dismiss everything that exposes government crimes as &quot;conspiracy theory&quot; no matter the seniority and reputation of the reporter.
评论 #37661027 未加载
pushcx超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s worth reading the comments from the last time this author&#x27;s writing on the Nord Stream bombing appeared: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34707305">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34707305</a><p>Also, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;20230908015110&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;seymourhersh.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;20230908015110&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;seymourhersh.subst...</a>
wiz21c超过 1 年前
dunno if it&#x27;s true but it sounds true :-)