TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Bayes' Theorem explained by Yudkowsky

57 点作者 spydez超过 16 年前

6 条评论

aswanson超过 16 年前
Went back and re-read his tribute to his brother/exhortation to move forward science again. It's like <i>You and Your Research</i> on steroids. If that essay doesn't motivate you, I don't know what will. Insanely brave.
评论 #377510 未加载
评论 #377257 未加载
Retric超过 16 年前
It's always surprising that most people are that bad at math.<p>.01 x .8 /(.01 x .8 + (.99 x 9.6 / 100)) ~= 0.0776 or 7.8%
评论 #376827 未加载
评论 #376826 未加载
评论 #376972 未加载
rms超过 16 年前
This is my favorite writing by Yudkowsky: <a href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/05/faster-than-ein.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/05/faster-than-ein.html</a>
jcl超过 16 年前
It bugs me a little that he starts using the phrase "prior probability" before defining it. If your vocabulary already included the word "priors", you probably wouldn't need a Bayes tutorial. :)
herdrick超过 16 年前
[java applet] [java applet] [java applet] [java applet] [java applet]
评论 #377413 未加载
kirse超过 16 年前
Do significant digits matter in these sort of probability calculations?<p>Secondly, do we want doctors to tell us the probablility estimate that we have cancer or do we want doctors to tell us Yes or No?<p>Personally, I don't care what my probability score is if the answer is "No". Even if the answer was "Yes", an optimistic person would ignore the odds anyway.
评论 #377039 未加载