TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Removing Sybils from an Open Network

43 点作者 mattwilsonn888超过 1 年前

6 条评论

xmcqdpt2超过 1 年前
This is super specific to an obscure blockchain. I feel like OP should provide a Conflict of Interest statement.
评论 #37735240 未加载
pawelduda超过 1 年前
Ok, I've read about this before but can someone with big brain dispute this? Seems like a solution to quite a problem but as it's crypto, not entire truth could be told here
评论 #37718761 未加载
katella超过 1 年前
Why should routing nodes be rewarded at all.
评论 #37720891 未加载
评论 #37735638 未加载
38超过 1 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sybil_attack" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sybil_attack</a>
评论 #37718438 未加载
pluto_modadic超过 1 年前
Solving Sybils for any blockchain is kinda something rational, ethical cryptographers wouldn&#x27;t want to do... but I&#x27;m sure you can pay someone to claim they&#x27;ve solved it.<p>I&#x27;m kinda okay with blockchains always remaining vulnerable and becoming relics of the past. It&#x27;s all a scam. Not patching it.
评论 #37717739 未加载
MollyRealized超过 1 年前
I asked GPT-4 if they could &quot;summarize for idiots&quot;. I do not have enough knowledge to say if they summarized it accurately, but for anyone like me, who felt like a very big dummy while reading this, here&#x27;s the summary:<p>The essay discusses a method to prevent Sybil attacks, where a single adversary controls multiple nodes on a network to subvert the network&#x27;s functionality, in blockchain networks by making it unprofitable for malicious nodes to add unnecessary &#x27;hops&#x27; in transaction paths. Saito&#x27;s mechanism rewards nodes for efficiently routing transactions to block producers, thus making Sybil attacks less lucrative. This is further illustrated with mathematical proof and examples comparing honest and Sybil behaviors, highlighting how the expected rewards change in both scenarios .