I used to worry a lot about the implications of studies like for people drinking fluoridated water, but at least in the SFBA, water is fluoridated to 0.7ppm, below the top threshold of the “low fluoride” group in this study
I admit that I am not expert in statistics, but the data they present seem to suggest that the highest scoring test group was in the medium exposure group? Also, something is not right with graph 2?
Important to note that many municipalities in Canada use hydrofluorosalicic acid to "fluoridate" their water supplies. Far more dangerous a substance, and fully legal under the Supreme Court of Canada's redefining of what "fluoridation" means in this country.
I don’t see why it needs to be added to the water at all instead of only in toothpaste. I’d rather have lots of people with rotting teeth than lots of low IQ people. It really makes no sense why it’s been pushed so hard and mandated.
“Water was collected from initially identified endemic fluoride regions according to the geological research of Government of India. “<p>Wonder why those areas were so fluoride endemic? First thought is factory waste running off into rivers?