TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Every app that adds AI looks like this

583 点作者 vitabenes超过 1 年前

62 条评论

rpastuszak超过 1 年前
My (briefly viral) personal take: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meat-gpt.sonnet.io" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meat-gpt.sonnet.io</a><p>- a huge chunk of my traffic comes from people who believe this is a real project, because AI tool catalogues keep hallucinating pitches for my AI PRODUCT<p>- this almost won an award but I lost to a site with 3d rotating sandwiches<p>- the silver lining: I met a guy who pivoted from startups to making beef jerky. We are a small, exclusive community known to some as the meatverse.<p>I also made <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;butter.sonnet.io" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;butter.sonnet.io</a> and people offered to pay me for it.<p>Perhaps I should monetise my Medieval Content Farm with those native ads in blackletter: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tidings.potato.horse" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tidings.potato.horse</a>
评论 #37871546 未加载
评论 #37871023 未加载
评论 #37873164 未加载
评论 #37871258 未加载
评论 #37871590 未加载
评论 #37871689 未加载
评论 #37871406 未加载
评论 #37871989 未加载
评论 #37871616 未加载
notbeuller超过 1 年前
It so reminds me of Douglas Adam&#x27;s Electric Monk from Dirk Gently:<p>&quot;The Electric Monk was a labor-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video recorder. Dishwashers washed tedious dishes for you, thus saving you the bother of washing them yourself, video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electric Monks believed things for you, thus saving you what was becoming an increasingly onerous task, that of believing all the things the world expected you to believe.<p>Unfortunately this Electric Monk had developed a fault, and had started to believe all kinds of things, more or less at random. It was even beginning to believe things they&#x27;d have difficulty believing in Salt Lake City. It had never heard of Salt Lake City, of course. Nor had it ever heard of a quingigillion, which was roughly the number of miles between this valley and the Great Salt Lake of Utah.&quot;
评论 #37871750 未加载
michaelteter超过 1 年前
Hype trains exist in tech the same way they exist in the seedy world of multi-level-marketing (which unfortunately due to some past clients I have a lot of experience with).<p>It doesn&#x27;t matter _what_ you&#x27;re selling. All that matters is that the hype train passes enough people that you can cash out your &quot;investment&quot;.<p>Each investment round is the cash out for previous ones, and the last round is the IPO, where ignorant (no negative connotation, just unknowing) public is left holding the bag of air.<p>And like the MLM pyramid schemes, sometimes the product or service does have some value to some people. But it gets sold to anyone and everyone, most of whom have no use for it.<p>Most products or services don&#x27;t need AI. But for sure, you needed to say BLOCKCHAIN somewhere in your business plan a few years ago, and now you need AI.<p>Eventually maybe we should just embrace hype trains and accept that people like to get excited about things they don&#x27;t understand, or things that are imaginary. Just go ahead and sell them a dream. Put AI in your widget and make more money. It&#x27;s ok. But don&#x27;t believe your own hype.
评论 #37871011 未加载
throwaway35934超过 1 年前
I work for a Fortune 500 company. One of our senior technology execs was just listed on Business Insider&#x27;s &quot;Top 100 people in AI&quot;. Our company has no products that use AI. The closest we have come to actually doing anything with AI is a tiny trial of GitHub Copilot.
评论 #37871744 未加载
评论 #37871308 未加载
评论 #37872878 未加载
the__alchemist超过 1 年前
The &quot;Absurd, honest comedy delivered twice a weekish through the vulnerable personal essays; type your email...!&quot; popup showed up, coincidentally, superimposed over the second image, the &quot;what are you stuck on&quot; prompt. It took me a bit to figure out it wasn&#x27;t part of the pic! At least the hypothetical AI page made me click something before asking for personal information.
评论 #37870802 未加载
评论 #37870728 未加载
评论 #37870859 未加载
评论 #37870625 未加载
skepticATX超过 1 年前
The problem is that companies are throwing tons of garbage at the wall to see what sticks. And somehow, investors are rewarding them for this.<p>Undoubtedly LLMs can be used to create useful features, but first companies will need to realize that<p>1) It will take more effort than throwing up a LLM front end for your product.<p>2) It&#x27;s probably not going to be a flashy, &quot;disruptive&quot; feature. Something that makes user experience just 5% easier&#x2F;more efficient is huge, but AI influencers won&#x27;t breathlessly shill your feature if that&#x27;s &quot;all&quot; that it does.<p>3) You have to think about problems to solve before thinking about solutions.
评论 #37870841 未加载
评论 #37870681 未加载
评论 #37871764 未加载
评论 #37873447 未加载
评论 #37898538 未加载
tomrod超过 1 年前
Oh my god, this is exactly how I feel about AI hype.<p>I&#x27;ve been in the &quot;AI&quot; space for quite awhile. The hype hurts, and it sets completely unrealistic expectations for both utility of the tools as well as the cost of the tools.
eimrine超过 1 年前
&quot;Gimme a high six&quot; is a nice joke considering that neural networks are notoriously bad at generating decent hands.
评论 #37870619 未加载
评论 #37877102 未加载
评论 #37871390 未加载
brucethemoose2超过 1 年前
What really amazes me is that, with all the money thrown at AI scams, the small group of &quot;hero&quot; generative AI tool maintainers on GitHub barely gets any funding.<p>There are a few exceptions (like TheBloke getting funded for their quants, and GGML getting some seed money)... But stuff like InvokeAI, VoltaMl, koboldcpp&#x2F;artbot and the AI Horde, Petals, the ControlNet dev and such should all be swimming in cash, but instead they are burnt out with basically nothing. And I&#x27;m sure there many more I don&#x27;t know about.
评论 #37872130 未加载
评论 #37873493 未加载
zigman1超过 1 年前
One would have thought that people within tech and all this &quot;entrepreneurialism&quot; would have a bit more of a rational and common sense, but it really seems that you can actually sell shit to everyone. I&#x27;m sad to see this shitfluencers on Twitter gaining so much traction.<p>But it is a great filter to whom not to listen in this virtual flood of opinions and advices.
评论 #37870848 未加载
pronik超过 1 年前
I remember a time some 25 years ago when shareware developers, years after Winamp, discovered that you could leave the rectangular UIs behind and make &quot;skins&quot; for their software. For several years everybody was adding skins for good or for bad reasons. It has become an indicator for me: if a new major version of a software has &quot;Skins!!!&quot; as the first item of the changelog, you could assume real innovation has stopped and you could reasonably expect its downfall in the next couple of months or years at most.<p>In the case of AI it&#x27;s a bit different for existing software and probably more of a hype train fueled by marketing departments than true lack of ideas. But the readiness to jump on these trains should be alarming, especially when long-existing features are suddenly being replaced by &quot;AI&quot;. I hope this will end soon and after sifting through fad ideas we&#x27;ll be left with few, but really usable products.
tempodox超过 1 年前
This article shows the appropriate amount of disrespect.<p>&gt; They don’t call it AI because they are not children.<p>Word. But nobody will heed their appeal to “stop it”. The hype is just too sweet, and too many people want to believe in miracles.
danielbln超过 1 年前
I for one hope the hype fever pitch dies down a little, because I love AI. Love LLMs, diffusion models, the various audio transformers. Live the ecosystem, love the PoCs, I just love it. I use some sort ot gen AI model every day to great avail. I can do without the marketing hype to be sure, but to me this technology is still exciting, even after working with it for the last 3+ years, it&#x27;s just sci-fi AF.
评论 #37871410 未加载
MichaelRo超过 1 年前
AI gold rush is the new underpants gnomes: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;x9isuwO" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;x9isuwO</a><p>Nobody&#x27;s got any idea how that&#x27;s actually going to turn into a profit but everyone&#x27;s busy stealing underpants.
评论 #37871921 未加载
poutrathor超过 1 年前
So nobody&#x27;s gonna comment that the guy in the painting is getting pickpocketed while watching the magic trick ? This is the real gem from this rant.
评论 #37892474 未加载
sovietmudkipz超过 1 年前
Off topic: Since AI has become an overloaded term and I like to build AI for video games (finite state machines, behavior trees, utility functions, etc) does anyone have a suggestion on what term to migrate to so when I say “I like writing AI for games” the listener knows what I’m referencing?
评论 #37871377 未加载
评论 #37871759 未加载
评论 #37873558 未加载
api超过 1 年前
The speed with which AI has become the new hot thing everyone must have is dizzying to me. It seems like it happened over a span of <i>weeks</i> after ChatGPT went live.<p>I wonder how much faster we can go. Can we have an entire tech hype bubble in one 24 hour period?
评论 #37888001 未加载
jklinger410超过 1 年前
This article is lazy and contains very little value. I&#x27;m convinced the people commenting here have not read it.
评论 #37871436 未加载
评论 #37871305 未加载
评论 #37872722 未加载
评论 #37871415 未加载
评论 #37871787 未加载
fernandotakai超过 1 年前
maybe i&#x27;m dumb, but i don&#x27;t see any place in my life right now where a bot (i refuse to call LLMs AI. they are not intelligent.) could help me.<p>chatgpt? well, i used for some funny things (like writing a poem about an amazing sandwich my wife made), but i never think &quot;let me use this&quot; whenever i have a problem.<p>image generation? i mean, maybe for memes? i tried bing-image-generator while high and had some laughs, but for the life of me i cannot see myself using it in any other way.<p>i also tried the notion ai stuff, but honestly, i just prefer writing everything myself, since writing is a skill that needs improvement and you can only improve by actually doing it.
评论 #37870741 未加载
评论 #37871255 未加载
评论 #37870797 未加载
评论 #37871006 未加载
VSpike超过 1 年前
&gt; All of Google is AI. But you don’t see them bandying it around like a kid with new light up shoes.<p>I was at Google Cloud Next London yesterday and I hate to disappoint you but _everything_ seemed to be about AI. The keynote was about AI. The decor was all AI generated. Each breakout had to mention AI, to the point where a couple of speakers joked that they _weren&#x27;t_ going to talk about AI. It was a bit depressing.
评论 #37877287 未加载
ta988超过 1 年前
Every substack post looks like this: 1. look at my emotional take on a hot topic 2. why don&#x27;t you subscribe to my substack 3. ok i got you to the end? I have something to sell to you
评论 #37871963 未加载
tjpnz超过 1 年前
&gt;All of Google is AI. But you don’t see them bandying it around like a kid with new light up shoes.<p>Google Calendar has that stupid icon on a feature for auto-selecting where you&#x27;ll attend a meeting based on your office schedule. They&#x27;re just as capable of bandying about their bullshit applications for AI as everyone else.
评论 #37876173 未加载
WesolyKubeczek超过 1 年前
I believe this is precisely why Apple avoids calling its own large language model features or other neural network-related things &quot;AI&quot;. It&#x27;s a very loaded term, very overhyped, carries a certain stigma, and it&#x27;s not like that bubble didn&#x27;t burst in the early 1990s or so.
Subdivide8452超过 1 年前
Kind of ironic that this site bothered me with one of those full screen, must-click-away, overlays trying to get me to subscribe to their newsletter.
评论 #37871144 未加载
prmoustache超过 1 年前
I was doing groceries the other day and ended up looking at a new CocaCola flavor said to be generated by AI.<p>Looks to me like AI is just the new buzzword that replaced crypto and NFT and we will just see more of it for a few months until it calms down.
评论 #37876903 未加载
评论 #37871211 未加载
didgetmaster超过 1 年前
&gt; I will pay money for you to not use the word AI anywhere on your app. Make that the premium tier and I will buy it...<p>No you won&#x27;t!
anonymoushn超过 1 年前
Its not exactly reassuring that Google is &quot;using AI&quot; to send scam emails to my inbox and articles that keep repeating the keywords they are ostensibly about to the top of the SERP
marban超过 1 年前
All valid points, but then you hit the bottom of the page to sign up for a (drumrolls), writing course.
karaterobot超过 1 年前
The only correction I&#x27;d make is that a lot of them ask you to create an account, or at least give them your email address, before you get to experience the magic.
评论 #37871774 未加载
wuliwong超过 1 年前
I am a bit more optimistic or just unfazed by all the AI hype. After seeing these &quot;hype trains&quot; before, it just seems like part of our collective process of figuring out what works. Sure, I think optimizing these cycles to burn less capital would be good but I guess I&#x27;m actually on the side of having a bunch of people throwing a bunch of crap against the wall and seeing what sticks. :)
throwaway9274超过 1 年前
We still don’t know what LLMs are <i>for.</i><p>By this I don’t mean LLMs aren’t useful. We have known that there was novel behavior happening as early as GPT-2.<p>GPT-3 represented a clearly novel transformative technology. But we still didn’t know <i>what to do with it.</i><p>The reason for this is that the people who come up with products are generally a different set of people from those who innovate novel ML models.<p>The latter tend to be PhDs or the extremely mathematically talented.<p>The former tend to be a mix of product-y software engineers &amp; engineer-y product &amp; strategy people.<p>There were some products, GitHub Copilot being the breakaway. Knowledge needs time to diffuse, and a market demand is necessary to catalyze that quickly.<p>Out of exasperation, OpenAI decided to take one of the most common prompting use cases on the GPT-3 beta playground, Q&amp;A, and make a chat product, almost as a technology demonstrator.<p>Then ChatGPT exploded to hundreds of millions of users.<p>All hell broke loose. Every Fortune 500 promised a “generative AI” rollout. And of course, like feverish corporate-branded “metaverse” stuff it all sucks.<p>You can’t “corporate partnership” and “internally accelerate” a technological shift of this magnitude. You can’t hire BCG to do it for you. And you can’t tack a model onto your existing product and call it done.<p>LLMs and other new foundation models require fundamentally new products. They require new middleware to be deployed like vector databases, RAG frameworks, and agentic systems.<p>Start ups are starting to crack these problems.<p>But my fear is that when the bottom drops out of the corporate efforts, the investment attitudes will shift just as there’s the most work to be done.
评论 #37873905 未加载
评论 #37873363 未加载
Roark66超过 1 年前
Well, not every one. I made an android locally run AI ESRGAN super resolution app (a year ago) to upscale your photos without uploading them &quot;to the cloud&quot; and it was a normal app with a normal UI.<p>There was a free and a paid version (the only difference was ads I was planning to run every couple of uses, but at the level of usage there was no point enabling them). I say it was, because Google has likely pulled it from the store for not being upgraded to android 13 before the end of August.<p>Not that many people were interested (about ~5 paid and 30 new free users per month) for about a year. So I&#x27;m not spending lots of time on it (it was me testing if people are interested in more private AI solutions, some are, but not the majority).<p>Instead we have apps like ones described and they have 1mln+ installs so evidently people want them. If I had to make my living making mobile apps I&#x27;d probably make the exact same thing seeing their success.
Nickersf超过 1 年前
I think we need to re-think the fundamental reasons for why we use computing technology. There was a time where computers were mainly used to assist humans in handling complex, tedious tasks. Specifically, tasks rooted in computation and organization of data.<p>Today people expect, because they have been sold the idea that computers should do everything from drawing for them to fulfilling their social needs as a human.<p>I think it&#x27;s time to step back and really think about what the role of computers should be and how we as humans use computers.<p>I remember when using the Internet and digital media were in their early stages. Compared to today there was a very small segment of the population doing those things. You were underground if you were playing video games on the Internet.<p>Most computers lived in offices doing what they did best: office work.<p>Maybe we&#x27;ve gone too far in the wrong direction.
charles_f超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s a new hammer and everyone is trying to make up new nails to hit with it.<p>Heard a pm say &quot;hey we don&#x27;t have anything about AI in there, what should we do with it&quot; while reviewing the plan for next quarter.<p>But hey the good thing is that we&#x27;ll have to figure out AI solutions for the problems that bad ai generates
tombert超过 1 年前
I suspect it&#x27;s going to be like Blockchain for awhile; companies are going to start rebranding themselves as &quot;AI-first&quot; or &quot;AI-powered&quot; just like camera companies [1] and iced tea companies [2] were doing with Blockchain back in 2017.<p>I guess that&#x27;s the price of progress; some entity invents&#x2F;refines a cool piece of tech, people speculate about the future of that tech, and then they wonder why Company X isn&#x27;t fully utilizing that tech.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;KodakCoin" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;KodakCoin</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Long_Blockchain_Corp" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Long_Blockchain_Corp</a>
graypegg超过 1 年前
Sometime on in this whole cycle and I still find LLM-prompts-as-the-interface extremely annoying. I have to pause and carefully think out the entirety of a task I want to do, I can’t just rely on a button being disabled or a confirmation dialog to realize I’m using a tool wrong. And then it usually does something bizarre and it’s hard to trace why it did that.<p>LLMs are still insanely impressive for things where I would normally have a free form conversation. (Summarization, expansion, paint an image) but the cases like Microsoft Copilot where using it to change a setting in windows is actually more annoying than just asking where that setting is located.<p>LLMs are the shittest version of a toolbar to me
smusamashah超过 1 年前
Author shared screenshots but didn&#x27;t mention the color &quot;purple&quot; or the shade of purple that is. Why every AI thing is now purple? Look at Shortwave, the really nice email app, they also turned AI and as a result have turned purple now. Look at their homepage.<p>Too me it very much looks like when every when was integrating crypto in their tech in some form and they were all using these similar colors and gradients.<p>Now when I see a site like this it basically turns me off. I really liked Shortwave, it was supposed to be the next Google inbox or better. Now it&#x27;s AI.
tracerbulletx超过 1 年前
I agree with the fact that there are a ton of low effort shitty companies riding the AI craze, but I think that cat looks pretty cool and it&#x27;s still very impressive a computer could generate it.
rglover超过 1 年前
&quot;How we got here&quot; can be summed up in one word: mimetics.<p>Originality is the rarest thing in this world. Most people operate from a position of fear and competition [1]. The sad truth is that, generally, everybody just does what everybody else does because everybody else is doing it.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;i-am-sovereign&#x2F;solo-podcast-from-kapilguptamdcom-competition-breeds-parity-and-mediocrity" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;i-am-sovereign&#x2F;solo-podcast-from-kapi...</a>
stetrain超过 1 年前
Ah but what about &lt;Productivity App&gt; which now has a Magic AI Sidebar(tm) which is just a GPT-3 prompt that maybe has been fed a list of your document titles to be slightly more relevant.
emmender1超过 1 年前
I guess we are at that part of the hype-cycle where the initial excitement is turning into doubt.<p>At this point, the vested interests (ai-vcs, startups, ai-researchers etc) must unleash a new wave of propaganda to keep the faith. eg: sama drops a tweet: &quot;saw AGI yesterday in a dark alley&quot;, or musk says &quot;optimus did a cartwheel - whoohoo&quot;, or lecunn publishes &quot;chain of thought is all you need&quot; on arxiv.<p>methinks crypto had more legs than AI - at least the initial adopters made some quick cash out of it.
nullptr_deref超过 1 年前
The problem also trickles to hiring and recruitment. Everyone and their parents are doing GenAI these days with multiple publications on top tier venues. What does this even mean?<p>Was there a hype cycle before this period on some other niches that almost everyone is doing?<p>In my life only I have seen one about web apps, then another on crypto. What was the bubble before that? Did everyone who started their career went through the route of hype cycles because the recruiters would call for interview? What are your opinions?
20wenty超过 1 年前
You&#x27;re not necessarily wrong, but you may also be throwing stones from a glass (Substack) house. Barely made it past the fold before I was nagged with a Substack popup.
mercurialsolo超过 1 年前
Will the real slim shady please stand up?<p>The current AI buzz is being ripped out by the wannabes - everything&#x27;s marketing and buzz and being able to distinguish the genuine jumps forward is harder because we have made everything a wrapper around the same models - u have a diffusion and a transformer model - and u make it easy to call them - what do u get - a 100+ diffusion &#x2F; transformer wrappers with a library of prompts - voila your new AI app &#x2F; agent.
adtac超过 1 年前
This is slightly tangential, but has anyone recently used ChatGPT for non-trivial programming tasks where you start typing a precise description of what you need from the system and by the time you finish writing it you realise there&#x27;s a simple way to do it? It has happened to me several times and it was as if serialising the problem was the hard part, like that famous Einstein quote.
评论 #37870835 未加载
评论 #37872063 未加载
mjr00超过 1 年前
The most egregious one to me has been CircleCI&#x27;s &quot;Ask an AI about this error&quot; option on failed builds. Always spits out something irrelevant at best or misleading at worst, and it does so in the typical ChatGPT high school essay voice, complete with superfluous intro and conclusion paragraphs.<p>&quot;Atlassian Intelligence&quot; may be just as bad, though...
TheCaptain4815超过 1 年前
I wonder how differentiating &#x27;AI Wrappers&#x27; can really be given the power of GPT4? There&#x27;s definitely some use cases I&#x27;ve thought of w&#x2F; finetuning for very niche programming languages (Source Hammer from Counterstrike for example), but in my everyday use I haven&#x27;t found anything that beats GPT4 + proper prompting.
评论 #37871232 未加载
hermitcrab超过 1 年前
I write and sell software that uses a genetic algorithm to optimize seating layouts for weddings and event, but I have so far resisted using the dreaded &quot;AI&quot; anywhere on my site.<p>At this point anything with an &#x27;if&#x27; statement in it is &quot;AI&quot; as far as marketing people are concerned.
somsak2超过 1 年前
&gt; All of Google is AI. But you don’t see them bandying it around like a kid with new light up shoes.<p>From a few months ago: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=-P-ein58laA">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=-P-ein58laA</a>
Eumenes超过 1 年前
Reminds me of the old Bootstrap days
评论 #37870813 未加载
ffitch超过 1 年前
Building an LLM wrapper is quick money right now, thus the abundance of pointless businesses, and AI fatigue.<p>I optimistically think that when the initial interest weans off, people will find creative ways to leverage generative ai in less obvious, but more practical fashion.
imiric超过 1 年前
&gt; All of Google is AI. &gt; But you don’t see them bandying it around like a kid with new light up shoes.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=YivUOqd91Nk">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=YivUOqd91Nk</a>
hobofan超过 1 年前
I think the key sentence is this:<p>&gt; But you don’t see them bandying it around like a kid with new light up shoes.<p>Yes, because Google and other big players are not after VC money, while all the companies that put it in their marketing copy are.
评论 #37871285 未加载
rchaud超过 1 年前
I call it the Canva-fication of AI.<p>I was at the Hubspot CRM conference a month ago and every single vendor seemed to be using that accursed emoji in their marketing materials and websites.
willsmith72超过 1 年前
I totally disagree about canva, some of their &quot;magic&quot; tools are really useful. I don&#x27;t care what they call it
always2slow超过 1 年前
This seems like an AI written article bashing AI. Complete with a numbered list where the AI forgot how to count. Oh and it&#x27;s literally just SEO article spam selling a &quot;workshop&quot;.<p>&gt;I’m teaching a workshop soon! An Invitation<p>200 points at this time, next AI article by the author: How to game HN and get your article spam on the front page! (SIGN UP FOR MY NEWSLETTER TO CONTINUE READING)
nojvek超过 1 年前
Machine learning is done with python, AI is with in powerpoint slides and marketing pages.
gspencley超过 1 年前
Could be worse. Remember the crypto &#x2F; blockchain hype of 2 weeks ago?
评论 #37877402 未加载
butz超过 1 年前
I wonder how long until Microsoft will add &quot;AI&quot; to Calculator.
throwuwu超过 1 年前
Shit writing, shit take, [current thing], #1 on HN, how the mighty have fallen.
bunderbunder超过 1 年前
I make (<i>sigh</i>) AI for a living, and arguably have been since before we started calling it AI.<p>Based on my own first-hand experience, if the first thing a company has to say about a product or feature is that it&#x27;s powered by AI, that is a strong signal that it isn&#x27;t actually very useful. If they had found it to be useful for reliably solving one or more real, clearly-identified problems, they would start by talking about that, because that sends a stronger signal to a higher-quality pool of potential customers.<p>The thing is, companies who have that kind of product are relatively rare, because getting to that point takes <i>work</i>. Lots of it. And it&#x27;s often quite grueling work. The kind of work that&#x27;s fundamentally unattractive to the swarms of ambitious, entrepreneurial-minded people looking to get rich starting their own business who drive most attempts at launching new products.
评论 #37871571 未加载
评论 #37871520 未加载
评论 #37871060 未加载
评论 #37871798 未加载
评论 #37871224 未加载
评论 #37871532 未加载
评论 #37871369 未加载
评论 #37871243 未加载
评论 #37871954 未加载
评论 #37872818 未加载
评论 #37872826 未加载
评论 #37871287 未加载
gmaster1440超过 1 年前
&gt; There are apps who use AI well. They don’t call it AI because they are not children. All of Google is AI. But you don’t see them bandying it around like a kid with new light up shoes.<p>Except of course you do, and well before the recent generative AI hype too (which they&#x27;ve also leaned heavily into on the marketing side fwiw).