TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Anything longer ago than yesterday should just say the actual date

798 点作者 microflash超过 1 年前

83 条评论

djaro超过 1 年前
Especially because it becomes so imprecise. On YouTube, &quot;1 year ago&quot; can mean anywhere from 365 to 729 days. Anything between 1 and 2 years ago becomes &quot;1 year ago&quot;.<p>So if I see two videos that were both uploaded &quot;a year ago&quot;, it&#x27;s impossible to know which is more recent without actually opening the videos, going to the description, and looking at the date.
评论 #37884506 未加载
评论 #37884643 未加载
评论 #37882192 未加载
评论 #37881682 未加载
评论 #37883250 未加载
评论 #37882130 未加载
评论 #37886734 未加载
评论 #37882599 未加载
评论 #37882280 未加载
评论 #37884692 未加载
评论 #37882201 未加载
fifticon超过 1 年前
How can I upvote this enough.. Luckily, often the timestamp is visible as a tooltip. Case in point: When you browse npm versions of packages, it will date them with &quot;version 5.3.27 was released &#x27;about a year ago&#x27; craziness. ARE YOU PEOPLE OUT OF YOUR BLOODY MIND? i am browsing through older packages to figure out the order they were released in, to sketch a pinning of compatible packages to form a build configuration, and 20 sequential packages are reported as &#x27;about a year ago&#x27;, requiring me to tooltip each one to figure out which ones are too recent to use.. The crayon eating has gotten out of hand. Brought to you by the same morons who build ORMs that map table names between (irregular) singular and plural. To serve what need..
评论 #37884254 未加载
评论 #37885225 未加载
评论 #37884203 未加载
评论 #37889459 未加载
not_your_vase超过 1 年前
I would go even further: I would remove these rounded, relative timestamps altogether.<p>iOS mail app really irritates me with this: whenever I open it, it tells me &quot;Updated just now&quot;. Then I pull to refresh, and suddenly there are unread emails I received 2 hours ago. Just tell me the damn time when you did the update.
评论 #37882844 未加载
评论 #37882751 未加载
xjay超过 1 年前
If they used absolute &lt;time&gt; the browser could format it to our preference (which varies).<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Web&#x2F;HTML&#x2F;Element&#x2F;time" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Web&#x2F;HTML&#x2F;Element&#x2F;ti...</a>
评论 #37882005 未加载
评论 #37881887 未加载
makeitdouble超过 1 年前
One aspect that is so disturbing with the fuzzy display is when the day of the week is the most relevant info.<p>Looking at gitlab&#x27;s history for instance, it&#x27;s way more helpful to know if it was merged on friday than &quot;last week&quot; or &quot;2 days ago&quot;.<p>Same for chat history etc. happening at the limit of a month, knowing exactly if the discussion happened before or after the beginning of the month can matter a lot.<p>For everything else I personally could care less if it was 4 weeks ago or 2 months ago, so getting the exact date also doesn&#x27;t deprive me of info.<p>I actually have a hard time imagining a scenario where a fuzzy date is more helpful than the exact one.
评论 #37881456 未加载
评论 #37881329 未加载
评论 #37882107 未加载
评论 #37882392 未加载
pmontra超过 1 年前
The worst application I use about misrepresenting timestamps is gitg.<p>Check this screenshot<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ubunlog.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2018&#x2F;06&#x2F;git-gui-gitg.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ubunlog.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2018&#x2F;06&#x2F;git-gui-gitg....</a><p>There are a number of commits marked as 3 days ago. It&#x27;s only a little bit better than no information at all: or doesn&#x27;t tell me if they happened in the morning or in the afternoon, or all within an hour or spread on all the day. That&#x27;s important when I didn&#x27;t logged how many hours I worked for a customer and I have to assess it one week later. I have to click every single commit and check the timestamp on the other side of the screen.
评论 #37882085 未加载
评论 #37884998 未加载
评论 #37882242 未加载
评论 #37882608 未加载
评论 #37882158 未加载
jacknews超过 1 年前
Just have both:<p><pre><code> - An hour ago (15:47) - Last week (MON 12 SEP 9:20) - Two years ago (WED 14 APR 2021 11:47) </code></pre> Date format to taste, of course.
评论 #37881395 未加载
评论 #37881484 未加载
评论 #37881232 未加载
jrmg超过 1 年前
Also: include the year. I’ve been bitten so many times by web forums not showing the date on comments (“5 Jul”), only to find the comment was written years ago that I no longer even trust dates without years. I find myself hunting around to try to get a year to be shown to me if it’s not there upfront.
评论 #37882322 未加载
Aspos超过 1 年前
&quot;1 year ago&quot; may not be precise enough, but &quot;11 months ago&quot; often is. When implementing such a function we tend to avoid &quot;1&quot;. Instead of &quot;1 week ago&quot; it is &quot;6 days ago&quot;
fatih-erikli超过 1 年前
Agree, when they are archived like in (google or web.archive.org), they will be relative to the indexing date if the label isn&#x27;t calculated in client side, probably the javascript won&#x27;t be working well in archive though.<p>Plus, consider using time tag, datetime attribute for displaying dates in a more accessible way. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Web&#x2F;HTML&#x2F;Element&#x2F;time" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Web&#x2F;HTML&#x2F;Element&#x2F;ti...</a> It&#x27;s not so much different than a span tag in browsers yet, but why not making out webpages future compatible.
dreamcompiler超过 1 年前
This is an issue in the spatial domain too. Whenever somebody invites me to their house I ask them &quot;what&#x27;s the address?&quot; and they inevitably proceed to give me a long verbal list of relative directions: &quot;Go east on highway 10 and take the first exit, then turn left, go two blocks, and then turn right.&quot; There are a thousand ways this can go wrong. Errors compound.<p>Please just give me your actual street address, and Google and I will figure out how to get there.*<p>*Except yes, Google gets many addresses wrong. Those are the exception.
评论 #37882284 未加载
jstanley超过 1 年前
I don&#x27;t like these unnecessarily-fuzzy dates either, but:<p>&gt; No human uses “less that 24 hours” as the definition of “yesterday”. Computers, unfortunately, do.<p>Is that right? I&#x27;ve never noticed anything using that definition of &quot;yesterday&quot;. Plus, if anything within the last 24 hours were &quot;yesterday&quot;, what would be &quot;today&quot;?
评论 #37881276 未加载
评论 #37881364 未加载
评论 #37883368 未加载
评论 #37881330 未加载
评论 #37881360 未加载
评论 #37881246 未加载
评论 #37881355 未加载
codazoda超过 1 年前
GitHub is my worst offender. When I need a timestamp for Git I always need the exact date and time, even if it&#x27;s recent.<p>This was mentioned elsewhere but it&#x27;s buried under another comment. I think GitHub needs top level placement for this audience. I imagine a lot of us feel this pain from time to time.
jameshart超过 1 年前
&gt; No human uses “less that 24 hours” as the definition of “yesterday”. Computers, unfortunately, do<p>Correction: computers <i>programmed by programmers who believe falsehoods about time zones and dates</i> do.<p>It’s entirely possible to unambiguously slide a timestamp into the local calendar of your user and from that determine what the local date offset is. If you just take floor(now - time &#x2F; 86400) then of course you’re going to produce garbage.
oftenwrong超过 1 年前
On a related note, I dislike when time zones are omitted from displayed datetimes. I have to guess: Is it my client&#x27;s tz, the server&#x27;s tz, UTC, or something else?
snarfy超过 1 年前
I&#x27;ll leave my chat program open for two weeks and it says the message was received &#x27;yesterday&#x27;, even though it was actually two weeks ago but hasn&#x27;t updated because it&#x27;s just been sitting there idle. Anything other than the actual timestamp is utterly useless.
评论 #37882965 未加载
jks超过 1 年前
In the other direction (and on a different scale) I hate it when the bus-schedule app I use tells me that my bus leaves &quot;in 8 minutes&quot;. Ok, I&#x27;ll put on my shoes and jacket, check if I have all the stuff in my bag - darnit, I forgot my book, can I spend a minute searching for it and still catch the bus? I check the time, which is 9:57, and I remember that the bus leaves... 8 minutes after some unspecified moment a few minutes ago.
djha-skin超过 1 年前
I actually really hate fuzzy date displays. More often than not I want to know exactly when something happened and 2 hours ago isn&#x27;t usually good enough. Just tell me the exact time I&#x27;m a smart guy I can figure out how long ago that was.
xp84超过 1 年前
It’s interesting here in that there’s a sizable group (looks to me like 25% but let’s be generous and assume 50%). Seems like the kind of thing that should 100% be a user preference.<p>Too bad “having too many options” is perceived as a bad thing by the current regime of aesthetics-first “designers.” It’s the only thing they hate more than using screen real estate for something besides seas of white space.
ctxc超过 1 年前
We&#x27;ll I&#x27;d much rather see &quot;posted last week&quot; where precision isn&#x27;t needed over having to look up the date in the calendar.<p>Where precision is needed (maybe finegrained transactions?) date and time might be better.
评论 #37881114 未加载
评论 #37881315 未加载
评论 #37882509 未加载
评论 #37882525 未加载
评论 #37881581 未加载
评论 #37881227 未加载
评论 #37882150 未加载
quitit超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m glad I&#x27;m not alone in this, Apple&#x27;s Mail app used to display Monday&#x2F;Tuesday&#x2F;Wednesday&#x2F;etc for the last week of email before switching to numeric dates. It would drive me crazy as I mentally work with dates and having to constantly check &quot;ok what date was last Tuesday&quot;, &quot;ok what date was last Saturday&quot;, introduced needless complexity.<p>Someone must have spoken up, because it&#x27;s now as follows: the time(for today&#x27;s email), &quot;Yesterday&quot;, then the numerical dates.<p>On a tangent: Maybe one of our german friends can answer if the day before yesterday is displayed as &quot;vorgestern&quot;, since that&#x27;s part of the german lexicon.<p>Second tangent: While we&#x27;re at it, can English finally standardise what &quot;next &lt;day&gt;&quot; means. For example I&#x27;m writing this on Saturday, and &quot;next Monday&quot; is permitted to mean either in 2 days time or in 9 days time.
unlikelytomato超过 1 年前
My favorite is when I see a photo posted to Google maps &quot;1653 days 5 hours ago&quot;
rickcarlino超过 1 年前
&#x2F;u&#x2F;epistasis said it best: “UI is communication, and UI designers have decided that mumbling is cool.”
评论 #37886577 未加载
tapvt超过 1 年前
This is my biggest complaint when i reflexively type `git log` to get some context on a branch.
评论 #37882663 未加载
HocusLocus超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m grumpy too... and I think pages that have chatty dates and do not contain embedded parseable dates&#x2F;times at all should be shot with a poop gun.<p>But I realize that humans feel the need to do this and I like the way Reddit does it.<p>&lt;time title=&quot;Sat Sep 9 13:06:15 2023 UTC&quot; datetime=&quot;2023-09-09T13:06:15+00:00&quot; class=&quot;&quot;&gt;1 month ago&lt;&#x2F;time&gt;<p>with a title to show tooltip for casual interest, but especially important, the chatty time within an explicit TIME tag that allows parseable stamps to be saved with pages and mined regardless of local naming conventions.
dabedee超过 1 年前
Github does that and it always makes it very difficult to understand when something was actually done&#x2F;committed.
评论 #37883042 未加载
评论 #37882788 未加载
评论 #37882437 未加载
joshstrange超过 1 年前
Apple Wallet&#x2F;Card is so annoying with this. It puts dates on transactions over a week old but within the last week it says “Wednesday” (DOW) or “Yesterday”. I don’t use my Apple Card for a lot since it doesn’t automatically integrate with YNAB and it’s always a pain to enter those transactions.<p>Thankfully YNAB’s date picker is a little calendar so I can figure out the right date easily enough but it’s always jarring to see “Monday” after I’ve been looking at real dates for older transactions.
sidlls超过 1 年前
This isn&#x27;t just a &quot;problem&quot; with computers and fuzzy &quot;&lt;time ago&gt;&quot; labels. Humans do this, too. The worst is when people use inappropriately long periods, for example when a reporter says something like &quot;Joe Criminal was convicted last month of XYZ&quot;, when &quot;last month&quot; means some time in the previous few days that happened to fall in the previous month (this kind of thing happens a lot). It takes more effort to come up with that bullshit than to simply be more precise.
ergonaught超过 1 年前
Everything should just say the actual date&#x2F;time. The “longer ago than yesterday” bit is the slippery slope. It’s never acceptable. If it’s not configurable, it’s always the wrong idea.
Jenda_超过 1 年前
I have a slightly related problem: infinite scrolling as the only way to access the archive. Like, imagine I want to know what some blog&#x2F;media site posted during some important historical event, and there is no pagination or calendar to pick. Or am I just using the web wrong and there is some way? Example: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.astralcodexten.com&#x2F;archive" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.astralcodexten.com&#x2F;archive</a>
temporallobe超过 1 年前
This kind of thing is especially egregious on the GitLab UI where, for example, something was committed “a moment ago”, “just now”, or some vague shit like that.
评论 #37885068 未加载
评论 #37889604 未加载
hbcondo714超过 1 年前
I recently came across this conumdrum myself when developing a live streaming web app[1]. The app formats a DateTime using a fuzzy relative duration[2] which displays &quot;1 minute ago&quot;, &quot;2 days ago&quot;, &quot;yesterday&quot;, etc...<p>I also concur with the author of the post saying &quot;ago&quot; is not enough. So the app has been updated to display:<p><pre><code> fuzzy relative duration hour:minute:second period timezone full_day_name abbreviated_month_name day_number </code></pre> I had to write a bit of logic[3] since new items only arrive on weekdays so when viewed on the weekend, new items do not say &quot;23 hours ago&quot; and instead say &quot;yesterday&quot;.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;live.last10k.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;live.last10k.com</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hexdocs.pm&#x2F;timex&#x2F;Timex.html#from_now&#x2F;3" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hexdocs.pm&#x2F;timex&#x2F;Timex.html#from_now&#x2F;3</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;hbcondo&#x2F;last10k_liveview&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;lib&#x2F;last10k_web&#x2F;live&#x2F;filings_live.ex#L138C1-L149C20">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;hbcondo&#x2F;last10k_liveview&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;lib&#x2F;la...</a>
mcphage超过 1 年前
I’d be happy if articles included at least the year. So many times I’ll come across something, and have no idea how recent it was because there’s no date whatsoever.
davidthewatson超过 1 年前
Agree with the sentiment, but I&#x27;m sad that meaningful words like fortnight that once colored language are mostly archaic.<p>Mike Meyers deserves credit for trying to keep such language alive 30 years ago:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt0108174&#x2F;characters&#x2F;nm0001439" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt0108174&#x2F;characters&#x2F;nm0001439</a>
评论 #37885804 未加载
CrzyLngPwd超过 1 年前
I like the imprecise date, especially when they have the eact datetime, down to the second, in a ABBR title, which is clickable on mobile.<p>I work from home, for myself, and I don&#x27;t care what date it is and I rarely both with the date, and knowing something was about a week or a month ago is about as accurate as I need.
globular-toast超过 1 年前
For my work I use the following simple design: display the date and when you hover it tells you how many days ago it is etc. I initially had it the other day around, but users complained and said the date was more useful. I hate websites that don&#x27;t even give the date on hover.
exabrial超过 1 年前
A lot of these &quot;UI Features&quot; are just annoying. the worst one is cutting off the ends of Tex...
Xenoamorphous超过 1 年前
I absolutely hate that recent versions of Outlook (at least in a Mac) shows “yesterday” in the date field in emails. I get hundreds of dates per day, show me the bloody time too! And this is not configurable!<p>“Yesterday” is barely any shorter than the date in “yyyy&#x2F;mm&#x2F;dd hh:mi:ss”.
评论 #37883774 未加载
lorenzosnap超过 1 年前
The reporting of a message&#x27;s timestamp really depends on the system you are working on. And the key aspect is to genuinely think how the users think about that timestamp. I recently implemented it in a real time system where I write things like &quot;just now&quot; (within the last 10 seconds) &quot;more than 10 seconds ago&quot; (between 10 seconds and less than a minute) &quot;more than a minute ago&quot; (between 1 one minute and less than 10 minutes) &quot;more than 10 minutes ago&quot; (between 10 minutes and less than 1 hour) ... (I think you get the gist) After it say more than a day... then that&#x27;s it the message is considered very old
Fanmade超过 1 年前
I remember when I had to use Jira for the first time, which had this &quot;n days ago&quot; display for the tickets. I don&#x27;t remember if that couldn&#x27;t be changed or the person in charge just could not&#x2F;would not do it, but I needed the proper dates often. So I wrote a basic user script which would read the actual dates out of the title (at least the date was in there) tags and then replace the unusable default output with it. I put that in button on the bookmarks bar and over time, several people saw it and adopted my solution. I never met anyone who liked the &quot;human readable&quot; format more that the actual date.
PennRobotics超过 1 年前
In Windows Explorer, it&#x27;s always a mystery if my date specifier is valid. I would often forget a colon or use the wrong flag name or accidentally use a leading dash as most command line flags would accept. When there are then no search results, I mistakenly assume the document I want hasn&#x27;t been uploaded yet. I email a colleague, they reply it&#x27;s in the network drive as anyone in the organization would expect, I look like an amateur.<p>I&#x27;ve resorted to using &quot;datemodified:this year -kind:=folder&quot; on a keyboard macro and changing &#x27;year&#x27; to &#x27;month&#x27; or &#x27;this&#x27; to &#x27;last&#x27;... or using WSL to search.<p>One obvious problem here is that the number of files I search through changes with each season. January and February are the worst, because &quot;last month&quot; and &quot;last year&quot; overlap for one month, and then on February 1st, the query results are again exclusive. If I want all PDFs published in the past three weeks after returning from winter break, I need to use two search queries in Explorer.<p>Contrast that with Linux, where there are multiple standard, well-documented, reasonably easy to remember methods of searching by date, including within very specific timeframes---not just a choice of month or year. On the GUI side, GNOME Files has much more customizability and isn&#x27;t any harder to understand than Explorer.<p>Just as the past decade has been a disappointment in home assistant progress, I had hoped in this present age, ANY reasonably query could be parsed, and optionally, the exact query shown as the machine sees and&#x2F;or a plain-text standardized description of the search.<p><pre><code> [&lt;Ctrl&gt; + F] &quot;PDFs from the past three weeks&quot; ↓ Parsed: find &quot;&#x2F;&#x2F;doc-network&#x2F;rel&#x2F;**&#x2F;*.pdf&quot; &#x2F;createdafter 2023-09-24 Searching for all Adobe Reader documents (PDF format) created between three weeks ago and today in the current folder (&quot;rel&quot;) and&#x2F;or any subfolder. </code></pre> As a bonus, the best five results matching MOST (but not all) of the query would be previewed at the bottom of the search results, slightly greyed, with &quot;84 weaker matches found, such as...&quot;, and this could also be disabled for privacy&#x2F;performance&#x2F;etc reasons
echelon超过 1 年前
I disagree. Delta time requires less computational load on the brain.<p>You rarely need to process the precise dates. If the article or item is old, &quot;years&quot; is the perfect measure. You very rarely need to consider the precise day the thing was created on.<p>Most tools should simply show the date as a tooltip. I was just sharing this video [1] on another thread, and YouTube does it perfectly. Date shows up on hover.<p>If you&#x27;re presenting records in a tabular format, then dates win. But consumer products are enhanced by relative time.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=WqZLkzdNYuI">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=WqZLkzdNYuI</a>
评论 #37881931 未加载
评论 #37881290 未加载
评论 #37881722 未加载
评论 #37882062 未加载
评论 #37881380 未加载
评论 #37881305 未加载
评论 #37881248 未加载
layer8超过 1 年前
The compromise is to have the actual timestamp as a tooltip, and&#x2F;or have a click&#x2F;tap toggle the representation. But yes, it’s often annoying to only have a vague “3 months ago”.
novok超过 1 年前
I like how apple photos does it. It&#x27;s today, yesterday, then day of the week name (tuesday) and then the date after you pass the 7 day threshold. And they always put in the time
dboreham超过 1 年前
Whatever fancy misguided millennial time encoding your planning to use, display the actual time stamp as well (yes with TZ) for the rest of us. Plenty of screen space these days.
apaprocki超过 1 年前
Maybe I’m in the minority, but if you’re ever not going to display the actual date, put the exact date&#x2F;time in a nice, readable tooltip, or otherwise surface a way to see&#x2F;copy it on right-click. I feel like some of this could be highly customized user agent settings. Always send the most precise data to the renderer and let it render how the user wants to consume it. By default, that could be how you want them to see it, but don’t get in the way.
rvdginste超过 1 年前
I find these imprecise, rounded, relative timestamps very irritating and I am so happy to see that I am not the only one.<p>If you have the exact absolute data, then just give me that.. in its original form. Unbelievable that people put effort into making it less precise and making relative. Why? Because it looks _cute_? Personally, I always find it hard and tiring to mentally process these and map it back to an actual point in time.
fuster超过 1 年前
Thank you for this. I actually thought it was only me that found these kinds of &quot;timestamps&quot; much less useful more often than not.
phendrenad2超过 1 年前
This depends on how important the precision is. &quot;1 week ago&quot; can be fine (for blog posts), or it can be stupid (for news articles).
antifa超过 1 年前
JIRA&#x2F;bitbucket: something that really pissed me off. It was early January. I was in a rush and needed to know if some commits deployed a few days ago, 1 week ago, or 2-4 weeks ago, or never. Nothing overly specific. I get to the specific page for it. All of the deployment dates say something completely useless like &quot;last year&quot; or &quot;a year ago&quot;.
jquast超过 1 年前
Why is nobody mentioning using a tenths decimal, like 1.1 days ago, 1.9 years ago, 2.5 weeks ago. That’s how I like to implement it!
评论 #37882368 未加载
taeric超过 1 年前
Meh. You should be able to get to the date, but relative times are super useful. Especially as inputs. And realize relative dates are calendar specific. Last week could be just 12 hours ago.<p>If I want a picture we took, odds are high I will have a fuzzy recollection of when. At this point, &quot;last decade,&quot; is probably pretty useful.
tlogan超过 1 年前
Yeah. For emails I use display time stamps extension: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;display-email-time-by-clo&#x2F;kedlbojealkpdllmgjeciofngjeokhno" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;display-email-time...</a>
roguas超过 1 年前
I disagree. I don&#x27;t know what day it is, have to check and I dont want to run this computation even if I knew without checking. Likely this is preference thingy, you prefer precise, I prefer convenient.
walthamstow超过 1 年前
If I added up all the seconds I&#x27;ve waited hovering over a GitHub date waiting for the proper timestamp...<p>It seems to me part of this &#x27;friendly&#x27; design and copy that is everywhere on the internet these days. You&#x27;re not my friend, you&#x27;re a tool, like a screwdriver or a kettle.
m463超过 1 年前
Does anyone remember text clocks from decades ago.<p><pre><code> &quot;It&#x27;s a little before half past four.&quot; </code></pre> (so long ago, I can&#x27;t remember the utility that presented the time like that)
Aeolun超过 1 年前
Since everyone here seems to be screaming for absolute dates, let me say the opposite. Whenever I look st a timestamp, 80% of the time I’m interested only in how far back that time was relative to today. Relative timestamps are great for at a glance viewing.
coding123超过 1 年前
At minimum it should say Friday Morning. Glad someone is fighting back on this practice.
astura超过 1 年前
Gitlab gets me with this every Monday morning. I see someone did something &quot;two days ago&quot; I think &quot;they worked the weekend?&quot; I hover over the date and realized Gitlab thinks Friday afternoon was two days ago.
评论 #37884054 未加载
nazri1超过 1 年前
I have given up on all hope of UI&#x2F;UX getting better on general consumer devices. The downward trend started since smartphone became mainstream.
jmeri超过 1 年前
That is so true. Many websites provide no age indication whatsoever... I hate guessing if the information provided was correct yesterday or five years ago.
mikelward超过 1 年前
At 00:00, for an email received one minute ago, it says &quot;yesterday&quot;.<p>If they don&#x27;t have space for the full date and time, it could be &quot;Fri 23:59&quot;.
wouldbecouldbe超过 1 年前
I mean if we are going to nitpick. Last Tuesday etc would be even better. Then past a week give the dates. If possible with day name instead of nr
McNutty超过 1 年前
I just spent a while reading several pages of the grumpy.website, lots of good content there and should be mandatory reading for UI designers
tlogan超过 1 年前
The worst part is when you share screenshot of something: there are not actually dates so person receiving screenshots has no clue.
hnthrowaway0315超过 1 年前
Damn right. I don&#x27;t get why but both Github and GCP don&#x27;t show precise date. Why???? Who TF made the decision?
butz超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s funny when OpenStreetMap &quot;User blocks&quot; page display status that &quot;Ends in over 90 years&quot;.
anigbrowl超过 1 年前
Yes, I&#x27;m sick of these cutesy approximations on social media as well, it screates more confusion than clarity.
NikkiA超过 1 年前
I&#x27;ll go further and say anything longer ago than an hour should show the date + time, with timezone.
deckar01超过 1 年前
You don’t need time deltas for display. Just omit the prefix (left of the minute) that is equal to now.
cushpush超过 1 年前
Always use the name of the day of the week, Tomorrow is vaguetalk for Future and Yesterday, past.
higeorge13超过 1 年前
Imagine in 100+ years, people watching youtube videos uploaded _1 century ago_.
amelius超过 1 年前
Fast forward 10^8 years, and the actual date will cause too much visual clutter.
Animats超过 1 年前
Worse date things:<p>* Displaying &quot;October 13&quot; for dates that are years old.<p>* The convention that published papers don&#x27;t have dates on them. This is a convention from the days when papers came in bound journals with a date on the cover, so there was no need for a date on each article. Now they come as standalone PDF files with no date info.
rerdavies超过 1 年前
I think we can all agree that youtube does it horribly wrong. But it seems silly to complain about a practice that increases utility by citing examples of software that has done it wrong.<p>And anything less than a week ago (but more than 24 hours ago) should just say the day of the week.
评论 #37893679 未加载
评论 #37882186 未加载
RecycledEle超过 1 年前
Everything upload din the last 5 minutes should say the exact date.
zephrx1111超过 1 年前
Ca we do both, 1 year ago: 2022-1-1?
amitizle超过 1 年前
I thought about that also a week ago
solumunus超过 1 年前
I imagine the vague “a year ago”, etc is usually the product of some back end scaling strategy?
评论 #37881638 未加载
评论 #37881350 未加载
rokhayakebe超过 1 年前
How about showing both?
brainzap超过 1 年前
yes please!
rerdavies超过 1 年前
The obvious solution: milliseconds since 1970&#x2F;1&#x2F;1T00:00:00Z.<p>The best compromises make everyone equally unhappy.<p>Either that or &quot;Wednesday about teatime&quot;.<p>&#x2F;s<p>But seriously. Youtube: NOBODY cares whether a video is 2.46 years old. Github: slightly annoying, but 3 days ago is generally more useful if you have to choose only one.
dang超过 1 年前
Url changed from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mjtsai.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2023&#x2F;10&#x2F;13&#x2F;relative-time-labels&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mjtsai.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2023&#x2F;10&#x2F;13&#x2F;relative-time-labels&#x2F;</a>, which points to this.