TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Think in Analog, Capture in Digital

61 点作者 HuwFulcher超过 1 年前

8 条评论

seanhunter超过 1 年前
The end boss of writing a lot (imo) has got to be Leonhard Euler[1]. Died in 1783, published over 500 papers, books articles etc in his lifetime across a very broad range of topics in maths and the sciences.<p>There has been a project[2] to publish the rest of his complete works and it is still not done even though it has been going for <i>over a hundred years</i> and has published more than 80 volumes so far.<p>There&#x27;s an incredible quote from his wiki page:<p><pre><code> It has been estimated that Leonard Euler was the author of a quarter of the combined output in mathematics, physics, mechanics, astronomy, and navigation in the 18th century. </code></pre> 1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Leonhard_Euler" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Leonhard_Euler</a><p>2: The Opera Omnia <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bernoulli-euler-gesellschaft.ch&#x2F;en&#x2F;opera_omnia" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bernoulli-euler-gesellschaft.ch&#x2F;en&#x2F;opera_omnia</a>
评论 #37888244 未加载
bsaul超过 1 年前
Not sure which timeframe the author is talking about, but i think the paradox of the digital age is that long term preservation (&gt;50 years) is clearly not a given.<p>I&#x27;m thinking about printing my photos in a paper photo books to make sure they&#x27;ll never disappear in case of an icloud misbehavior.<p>And handwritten letters between diplomats will probably be there long after google decides to shutdown gmail or go bankrupt.
评论 #37888276 未加载
评论 #37888599 未加载
firewolf34超过 1 年前
Just another reason for one to get into org-mode[1] and org-roam[2].<p>Combine this with the concept of Zettelkasten[3] and you have a wonderful way to organize and store all your notes and writings, and even a way to know at what point you should move your idea from analog to digital (based on it&#x27;s maturity, e.g. &quot;evergreen state&quot;).<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;orgmode.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;orgmode.org&#x2F;</a> 2. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.orgroam.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.orgroam.com&#x2F;</a> 3. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Zettelkasten" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Zettelkasten</a>
评论 #37890876 未加载
评论 #37888086 未加载
评论 #37889744 未加载
schaefer超过 1 年前
speaking to the heart of the article:<p>How? Can anyone share a polished workflow for converting handwritten notes on paper to plain text ascii (by this I mean an open-source OCR pipeline)?<p>Of course, I can transcribe my handwritten notes manually. But there is friction there that keeps me lugging a laptop when I can, and simply doing without note-taking when a laptop isn&#x27;t available.
评论 #37894396 未加载
评论 #37892191 未加载
评论 #37890891 未加载
Multicomp超过 1 年前
Capturing or thinking in either is an improvement over people trying to keep everything in their heads, something we&#x27;re are in the USA completely not taught in public schools.<p>There are various tools I&#x27;ve tried from this classic HN discussion regarding digital tools, from my infatuation over time with fancy pilot g2 pens, to Casio pdas, to palm treos to the HP Compaq TC1000 with Onenote 2003 (pen computer with electronic notebook!) to my ongoing fountain pen habit to my current desire to make the Microsoft courier concept real life by buying an expensive Lenovo Yoga 9i (why are booklet PC form factors so impossible to find!? I would ask), the tool search is a worthy and never ending hobby.<p>But it was only when I wrote applied the mental process of &quot;capture clarify organize reflect and engage&quot; taught in David Allen&#x27;s Getting Things Done system did I manage to find what I was looking for: a mental algorithm to respond to all the novel information in my life so it can take its proper place among my existing life landscape.<p>I was capturing reams of notes in analog or digital but then I never knew what to DO with them, so I just held them just in case I needed them again.<p>The GTD book is reputed as a personal organization &#x2F; filing and email advice and that&#x27;s useful in its own area, but besides the point of the book, which is to equip you to properly assess, digest, and see the landscape of your life.<p>I really love the mental clarity and confidence that, armed with these great analog fountain pens or great digital capture with Dragon pro 15, the captured notes not only exist, but I know what they are, what they mean to me, what I need to do with them (if any).<p>I still try out new personal wikis and other new digital (1) and analog tools (steal like an artist book talks about switching between creating in analog and editing in digital as both are more suited those in a general sense), but I now do it knowing that I don&#x27;t have the nagging desire for &#x27;something more&#x27; that I used to expect the tools to unlock, when the tools really function to be force multipliers for how I approach my life&#x27;s horizons and projects, both old and new, i get to just enjoy the new toy.<p>(1) I still try to avoid being nerd sniped trying to write my own digital notebook app like Lorien but saving on sqlite with onenote .one file import so I can have Windows and Linux app parity.
评论 #37893136 未加载
评论 #37892208 未加载
hiAndrewQuinn超过 1 年前
I consider SQLite to be a universal format, considering it is in the public domain, has one of the most heavily tested codebases on the planet, and has support until &quot;at least 2050&quot; in the author&#x27;s words. For that reason I&#x27;m actually very okay with just capturing my notes in Anki, which uses a SQLite database for everything under the hood. Crucially it avoids the pitfall of writing something down in a notebook and then never bothering to open it up again.
评论 #37889428 未加载
50超过 1 年前
Although, the &quot;pact with the digital has a price, which is this drastic loss of &#x27;measure.&#x27;&quot;[1]<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.publicbooks.org&#x2F;changes&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.publicbooks.org&#x2F;changes&#x2F;</a>
zubairq超过 1 年前
I like the concept of this