Good piece but one thing I hope the LLM revolution brings is a more uniform understanding of what a mental model is, and ultimately how to make better- still clickbaity, ofc- headlines.<p>Nature is not missing an evolutionary law. It's like a nonsensical sentence.<p>Our mental model for evolution is missing something, a generative explanation for the rise of structured complexity.<p>And is it a law? Something humans make that apply to human endeavors? Or is it a theory? Something generative that humans articulate that explains data and makes testable predictions?<p>"Science and philsophers identify evolutionary theory enhancement" is still pretty clickbaity, but more accurate.