科技回声

This article is trying desperately to avoid stating the obvious, that the evidence now points directly at a failed Hammas missile launch.

The BBC came out on the wrong side of this initially and are now pretending that the proximate cause is harder to determine than it is.

None of the 3 experts are engineers, here are their backgrounds:<p>- J Andres Gannon: PhD, Political Science (His background is omitted in the article)<p>- Justin Bronk: <a href="https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=9CS4EGsAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=9CS4EGsAAA...</a> (definitely some war stuff but not an engineer)<p>- Valeria Scuto, London School of Economics and Political Science (no need to say more)

What might add a lot of fuel to the flame is Israel's spokesperson initially confirming it was Isreal in a tweet he later deleted: <a href="https://twitter.com/HananyaNaftali/status/1714400598991261966" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://twitter.com/HananyaNaftali/status/171440059899126196...</a>

I think it's pretty obvious to any unbiased observer that this was caused by Hamas.

This article is trying desperately to avoid stating the obvious, that the evidence now points directly at a failed Hammas missile launch.

The BBC came out on the wrong side of this initially and are now pretending that the proximate cause is harder to determine than it is.

I think it's pretty obvious to any unbiased observer that this was caused by Hamas.

Gaza hospital: What video, pictures and other evidence tell us about blast

5 条评论

Gaza hospital: What video, pictures and other evidence tell us about blast

5 条评论