TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Marines Test Fire Robot Dog Armed with Rocket Launcher

48 点作者 kposehn超过 1 年前

11 条评论

reallymental超过 1 年前
As a human, this looks terrifying. Imagine being attacked by robot dogs. Now imagine being attacked by robot dogs that have rocket launchers!<p>Straight out of a Fast &amp; Furious movie. You can(!) make this shit up.<p>But as a person in tech, where all my values are directed towards &quot;making a better world&quot;... this also goes against every ideal we have. Unless you count living in a world where we have the ability to exterminate a large amount of people without proportional retaliation as a &quot;better world&quot;, in a non-nuclear way.<p>We don&#x27;t use biological weapons, so why use seeing robots with rockets on them? Oh yeah I forgot, we can&#x27;t &quot;catch a disease&quot; from these robots, and they have a &quot;limited&quot; damage capability, unlike bio-warfare that can go out of hand and can poison lands.<p>Coincidentally, the second point also means that we&#x27;ll have to make a lot of them, and gosh darn it we&#x27;ll have to build more factories and supply jobs to people. Wait a min...<p>I&#x27;m really happy that less marines will be put in harms way when they try to launch missiles from their shoulders (also crazy if you think about it too much), but they did sign up for it, and they&#x27;re not facing an army that can comprehend what&#x27;s coming towards them.<p>I&#x27;ve got competing opinions in my head, but one thing is for sure, autonomous warfare can either be a chess game that countries play (as a proxy for all the human lives), or the final game we&#x27;ll play.
评论 #37951134 未加载
评论 #37950284 未加载
评论 #37950329 未加载
评论 #37953417 未加载
评论 #37950876 未加载
评论 #37974293 未加载
评论 #37950334 未加载
评论 #37950341 未加载
评论 #37950606 未加载
LinuxBender超过 1 年前
None of the &quot;on a dog&quot; designs make sense to me. Robot tanks have always been able to maneuver over tougher obstacles and much harder to knock over and are significantly faster. Some tanks with the tall tracks can right-side themselves. Stability is important with aimed weapons. A tank can have a turret with multiple projectile devices and could fire any direction. A dog would fall over firing sideways. So why do we keep using the dog form?
评论 #37950230 未加载
评论 #37950254 未加载
评论 #37950706 未加载
评论 #37950456 未加载
评论 #37950206 未加载
评论 #37950243 未加载
评论 #37955657 未加载
评论 #37950203 未加载
评论 #37950219 未加载
beambot超过 1 年前
Atop a chinese-made Unitree dog? Huh. Did the DoD learn nothing from ceding drone supremacy to DJI?
评论 #37952184 未加载
gwnywg超过 1 年前
When I first saw Boston Dynamic&#x27;s Atlas I thought &quot;I wonder when will they fit a firearm to that&quot;. I was hoping my first thought was out of my cynism or bad sense of humour...
评论 #37951003 未加载
Johnny555超过 1 年前
<i>“Instead of having a Marine handle the weapon system, manipulate the safeties, we could put a remote trigger mechanism on it that allowed it to all be done remotely,</i><p>If its remotely activated with the same control channel as the trigger, that seems like less of a &quot;safety&quot; and more of a &quot;shooty&quot;.
wrp超过 1 年前
So, they strapped an M72 LAW on the back of a little robot dog. I can see a couple practical problems with getting anything like this configuration to work. One is that since the M72 is unguided, it takes fine targeting skill to make a hit from any distance. I doubt whether you can get that kind of control with a video feed mounted on a rickety platform.<p>Another problem is agility of the robot. Armor in a well managed battlefield will have an infantry screen. That is why getting close enough for a kill is hard. To avoid getting shot by defending forces, the robot would need to race in, quickly changing direction, and pop up close enough for a kill. I&#x27;ve seen robot dogs going through their paces and they don&#x27;t look nearly capable enough for this.
kvonhorn超过 1 年前
Won&#x27;t be long now before we&#x27;re reading a post about a robot dog with a suicide vest taking out a target softer than an armored vehicle.<p>The article neglects to mention that shipping is $1000, according to the Unitree website.
perihelions超过 1 年前
- <i>&quot;Designs based on tracked robots primarily designed for explosive ordnance disposal work have been and continue to be developed.&quot;</i><p>And also for the exact opposite: the Ukrainian conflict sees similar tracked robots used to place landmines.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;CombatFootage&#x2F;comments&#x2F;17ax9mx&#x2F;russians_watch_ukrainian_walle_laying_mines&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;CombatFootage&#x2F;comments&#x2F;17ax9mx&#x2F;russ...</a> (<i>&quot;Russians watch Ukrainian WALL-E laying mines (subtitles)&quot;</i>)
Sporktacular超过 1 年前
Humanity is coming along nicely.
评论 #37953020 未加载
senectus1超过 1 年前
ok thats cool.I was just playing with one of these last night.<p>The owners were making behave like a playful puppy and holy hell was it agile and fun to play with.<p>it sat up and begged, it jumped back and forth like a puppy that wants to play would do... it rolled over and flipped itself back onto its feet.<p>amazing tech with a very short battery life.
iancmceachern超过 1 年前
Hard no on this