TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Go Package for Building Progressive Web Apps

130 点作者 greenSunglass超过 1 年前

11 条评论

Sheeny96超过 1 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;a-h&#x2F;templ">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;a-h&#x2F;templ</a><p>Templ is a far more elegant solution for composing HTML within Go
评论 #37968845 未加载
评论 #37970322 未加载
评论 #37969809 未加载
评论 #37973218 未加载
latchkey超过 1 年前
Sigh. What is old is new again. It was a terrible idea back then too...<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jakarta.apache.org&#x2F;ecs&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jakarta.apache.org&#x2F;ecs&#x2F;</a>
评论 #37968529 未加载
评论 #37970674 未加载
评论 #37970266 未加载
评论 #37968442 未加载
dewey超过 1 年前
I can&#x27;t come up with a single reason that makes this better, easier, shorter than just using a html + Go templating.
评论 #37968742 未加载
rubicon33超过 1 年前
Am I the only one who feels like declarative programming fucking sucks?
评论 #37968503 未加载
评论 #37970081 未加载
评论 #37971424 未加载
评论 #37968253 未加载
didip超过 1 年前
I prefer writing a normal server-side with Go template and use HTMX on the client side.
awill88超过 1 年前
Hold up, they lost me at “declarative syntax” no, it’s Golang. It’s not infrastructure as code. Hard pass, use templates..
jtokoph超过 1 年前
It’s odd to me that children are added via a Body method. I would assume it would be a Children method; plus body is its own HTML tag.
ekiauhce超过 1 年前
Is this some kind of joke?<p>I waited about half a minute for percent counter reach 100%, then it just keep loading with the counter beyond one hundred lol<p>So “progressive”
评论 #37967411 未加载
评论 #37970090 未加载
omani超过 1 年前
Look at the comments here. Are you guys stupid bots? It&#x27;s about WEBASSEMBLY. Not an html template system.
评论 #37970248 未加载
评论 #37969352 未加载
omani超过 1 年前
I have used this and I like it.
bborud超过 1 年前
Why?<p>Has anyone ever worked on a product where this would be even remotely feasible?
评论 #37966806 未加载
评论 #37966801 未加载
评论 #37966828 未加载
评论 #37966875 未加载