TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chrome Removing Theora Support

143 点作者 rebelwebmaster超过 1 年前

11 条评论

hannob超过 1 年前
Interesting enough, I&#x27;m probably one of the few people who still has some theora videos on the web in some very old blogposts of mine.<p>Some history for people who are not aware: Theora became somewhat popular in free software &#x2F; open source circles, because at the time, it was the best codec which was believed to be either free of patents or the patents were explicitly opened up for free use. Therefore, if you were concerned about patents and their impact on free software, you&#x27;d use it. But Theora wasn&#x27;t a great codec, which we always knew, it just was the best we had before google bought and opened up VP8.<p>It&#x27;s an interesting tradeoff. Theora was never particularly popular, so you probably will have a low number of sites being impacted. But we kinda have a tradition that the web plattform rarely breaks things. You mostly can still use old html from 20-30 years ago, gif will probably stay supported in browsers forever, and I don&#x27;t think there are many examples of media formats in browsers being deprecated. Even odd things like bmp are still supported.
评论 #37996210 未加载
评论 #37995699 未加载
评论 #38030895 未加载
评论 #37996322 未加载
sandyarmstrong超过 1 年前
Firefox as well: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1860492" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1860492</a><p>It&#x27;s a shame Theora never &quot;made it&quot;. The peak of its popularity is long past.
评论 #37994990 未加载
a1o超过 1 年前
Is there any good video codec that the library is as small or not much bigger as Theora and that has no patent&#x2F;license issue?<p>I tried to use VP9 in the past but it&#x27;s like 20-40MBs a dll. The lowest I could find was dav1d and it&#x27;s still around 4MB for the library dll and encoding AV1 and getting good compression rate was not trivial.
评论 #37994377 未加载
评论 #37994210 未加载
评论 #37993740 未加载
评论 #37993864 未加载
评论 #37993790 未加载
gjsman-1000超过 1 年前
I won’t miss Theora - but I am as part of my job helping a business migrate from some old open-source software which inexplicably re-encoded almost all audio uploads into Ogg Vorbis audio files.<p>I can just play those as they are, in any browser, except Safari. Painfully, macOS actually supports Vorbis, but only in a CAF (Core Audio Format) container instead of an Ogg container. Still hoping; because shipping an entire Ogg decoder in the browser with WASM works but is ugly.<p>Of course, I could also just re-encode them with a microservice but it’s just… bleh.
评论 #37994587 未加载
评论 #37997785 未加载
hardcopy超过 1 年前
TIL filename extensions .ogv, .ogg = Theora
评论 #37994462 未加载
评论 #37995376 未加载
renewiltord超过 1 年前
Interesting. Aligns with my belief that Wikipedia videos are rarely viewed. They’re often ogg theora.
eviks超过 1 年前
I wish the browsers were modular and you could simply disable&#x2F;enable the codecs you wanted and get and use the relevant libraries
评论 #37996943 未加载
qwerty456127超过 1 年前
Aren&#x27;t modern video codecs prohibitively computationally expensive for mediocre office-class PCs?
评论 #37999029 未加载
评论 #37996369 未加载
评论 #37996367 未加载
nicman23超过 1 年前
havent use actual theora (opus i still daily use) since gta:sa
sillywalk超过 1 年前
FTA:<p>&quot;Chrome will deprecate and remove support for the Theora video codec in desktop Chrome due to emerging security risks. Theora&#x27;s low (and now often incorrect) usage no longer justifies support for most users. &quot;
评论 #37993644 未加载
评论 #37994602 未加载
yuhong超过 1 年前
I am asking the WMF to add support for MP4: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;phabricator.wikimedia.org&#x2F;T329258" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;phabricator.wikimedia.org&#x2F;T329258</a>