TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

X Engineering Year Retrospective

63 点作者 sirobg超过 1 年前

8 条评论

swimwiththebeat超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m inclined to believe that they consolidated their code across a lot of their microservices and simplified their architecture since that was stressed a lot from the moment Musk acquired Twitter. But we also can&#x27;t really verify or disprove it.<p>I&#x27;m a bit confused about their so-called improvements to video recommendation quality and bot detection. I&#x27;ve seen a lot of sentiment from people that they see more bots, hate speech, and irrelevant content on their timelines. Maybe what I&#x27;m hearing is just anecdotal evidence or stories in a bubble?<p>The Sacramento data center migration to Portland is an entertaining story detailed here[1]. Here&#x27;s the Hacker News thread on it[2].<p>They have a GPU supercompute cluster?? It seems like they have the capability to do training and inference with state-of-the-art algorithms at massive scales then. Why have Twitter&#x27;s recommendations and ad revenue (even before the acquisition) been so poor then?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;09&#x2F;11&#x2F;elon-musk-moved-twitter-servers-himself-in-the-night-new-biography-details-his-maniacal-sense-of-urgency.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;09&#x2F;11&#x2F;elon-musk-moved-twitter-serv...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37470110">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37470110</a>
评论 #38044768 未加载
评论 #38046450 未加载
评论 #38046649 未加载
评论 #38046471 未加载
评论 #38044718 未加载
评论 #38052391 未加载
评论 #38046127 未加载
cratermoon超过 1 年前
&quot;Shutdown the Sacramento data center and re-provisioned the 5,200 racks and 148,000 servers, which generated more than $100M in annual savings.&quot;<p>Yeah, about that.. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;09&#x2F;11&#x2F;elon-musk-moved-twitter-servers-himself-in-the-night-new-biography-details-his-maniacal-sense-of-urgency.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;09&#x2F;11&#x2F;elon-musk-moved-twitter-serv...</a><p>&quot;Musk turned to his security guard and asked to borrow his pocket knife. Using it, he was able to lift one of the air vents in the floor, which allowed him to pry open the floor panels. He then crawled under the server floor himself, used the knife to jimmy open an electrical cabinet, pulled the server plugs, and waited to see what happened. Nothing exploded. The server was ready to be moved.&quot;
评论 #38045294 未加载
评论 #38045267 未加载
insanitybit超过 1 年前
&gt; Among the changes we made was a shift of all media&#x2F;blob artifacts out of the cloud, which reduced our overall cloud data storage size by 60%, and separately, we succeeded in reducing cloud data processing costs by 75%.<p>Huh. I feel like that&#x27;s the one place to <i>not</i> leave cloud. 90% of why I want to use AWS is S3.
评论 #38044794 未加载
评论 #38044770 未加载
csteubs超过 1 年前
I hope their Trust &amp; Security team has a roadmap that prioritizes topic and thread-jacking. The advent of GPT and their recent changes to creator compensation has created a massive drive for engagement by any means; the results are fairly predictable. Clicking on any trending topic usually surfaces completely unrelated videos with that topic&#x27;s hashtags (and all of the other trending topic hashtags) appended to the tweet.<p>Then you have the &quot;content creators&quot; who use GPT to summarize or add details to a post from a larger content aggregator in hopes of bandwagoning engagement. I see a lot of this type of behavior from popular History-focused accounts and the mega-accounts that post engagement bait content (think canned, &quot;desert island&quot;-type questions and polls). It&#x27;s less malicious but certainly reinforces cynicism towards the state of Twitter&#x2F;X and the broader social web.
tomohawk超过 1 年前
I&#x27;ve seen this in other places I&#x27;ve worked. Too many people and too much money to spend can be a lot worse than too few and not enough.
评论 #38044635 未加载
评论 #38044639 未加载
outside1234超过 1 年前
&quot;Shrank site traffic by 80%, yielding cost savings and cratering the company as a whole&quot;<p>I hope everyone there is getting paid in advance for their work...
评论 #38044625 未加载
评论 #38050703 未加载
rabf超过 1 年前
Changelog: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;cb_doge&#x2F;status&#x2F;1717668534078034024" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;cb_doge&#x2F;status&#x2F;1717668534078034024</a>
imperialdrive超过 1 年前
That project must be so much fun to work on. I&#x27;d pay just to shadow it.