TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Caller ID Made Simple

152 点作者 nantes大约 13 年前

16 条评论

AdleyEskridge大约 13 年前
Randall,<p>This looks remarkably easy to use. Just a small tip: On opencname's home page, you suggest users try the following API call:<p><pre><code> $ curl https://api.opencnam.com/v1/phone/2024561111 US GOVERNMENT </code></pre> I tried it and received a different result:<p><pre><code> $ curl https://api.opencnam.com/v1/phone/2024561111 DIST OF COLUMBI </code></pre> Perhaps you should update your home page to reflect this?
评论 #3815826 未加载
chime大约 13 年前
This is the first API that I've encountered that works with cellphone numbers. I can see this being integrated into Android for incoming calls from unknown cellphone numbers.
评论 #3816076 未加载
评论 #3815723 未加载
sunsu大约 13 年前
I would ONLY be willing to use this if it returned better data than Twilio's CNAM lookups (costs $0.01) for a cheaper overall price.<p>So far, I've tested my number, and a few others, that I know have CNAM data that this service only provides a STATE for. Hopefully it will get better but it's not there yet for me.
asciident大约 13 年前
I tried 6 numbers of friends and only one returned a result. Are many numbers not callerid-able, or is the api just bogged down?
评论 #3815735 未加载
评论 #3815733 未加载
EricR23大约 13 年前
This is awesome! I had a couple of free hours, so I hacked together a little Ruby app that validates a telephone number and full name pair. This could be used for sign-up security, etc. You can find the repo here: <a href="https://github.com/EricR/sinatra-cnam-lookup" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/EricR/sinatra-cnam-lookup</a>
joshaidan大约 13 年前
For what it's worth, and for all those asking questions about Canadian numbers, caller id name is handled differently in Canada than in the states. When a carrier sends an outgoing call, they include the caller id name in the SS7 IAM (Initial Message), unlike the states where the receiving carrier has to do a database lookup on the number to retrieve the name. This likely explains why a lot of Canadian numbers are not returning any results, or incorrect results.<p>Personally, I think the Canadian system of including the name in the IAM works a lot better than having to do a DB lookup.
评论 #3818698 未加载
sashametro大约 13 年前
I wonder if the providers of this service have thought about crowd-sourcing the caller-id information, like <a href="http://mrnumber.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mrnumber.com/</a> whose free tier harvests number-&#62;name mapping from users address books...
评论 #3820503 未加载
krrose27大约 13 年前
I definitely find it interesting.<p>As somehow it pulls up my (not) apparently unlisted home phone; also, it pulls up family members names for cellphones which are under my name on the contract.<p>So I am definitely interested in finding out where this data is being taken from?
评论 #3815840 未加载
adityar大约 13 年前
This may be common knowledge but in the browser address bar do <a href="https://api.opencnam.com/v1/phone/2024561111?format=text" rel="nofollow">https://api.opencnam.com/v1/phone/2024561111?format=text</a>
savrajsingh大约 13 年前
I've wondered why twilio doesn't have this feature. Good stuff!
评论 #3815687 未加载
infinitivium大约 13 年前
This is cool, but fix the double request thing if you're going to have a free version...
stillinbeta大约 13 年前
It seems odd that it only returns a province/state when just the area code provides more information than that. Example: any (647) or (416) area code will always be from Toronto, but numbers for both just return ONTARIO.
steveh73大约 13 年前
Please make it more obvious that this only works for US phone numbers
评论 #3815758 未加载
评论 #3815810 未加载
fenesiistvan大约 13 年前
NANPA (US+Canada) only :(
评论 #3816016 未加载
tocomment大约 13 年前
It just says "wireless caller" for my number. Does it usually provide more information? I don't know how useful this is otherwise.
评论 #3817257 未加载
huhtenberg大约 13 年前
The drawing - is that Goemon from Rupan/Lupin series by any chance?