Michael Arrington Removed From PandoDaily's board

If I wanted to hear about inside politics, I’d subscribe to pandodaily.

Seriously; why does anyone care about this attention-seeking assclown?

There's some fairly silly competition between tech blogs.<p>You can see from some of Sarah Lacy's tweets (<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/sarahcuda/status/189224285204783104" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/#!/sarahcuda/status/189224285204783104</a>) that PandoDaily and TechCrunch don't see eye to eye at all.<p>Arrington has recently been getting involved in TechCrunch again. (<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/04/im-back/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/04/im-back/</a>)<p>I'd surmise that the folks at PandoDaily felt weird about him having his hand in two techblogs.<p>Seems pretty silly, especially considering that CrunchFund is invested in PandoDaily and not TechCrunch, but that's what I'd guess.

Now the whole drama will rehash itself all over again :(

Any idea on what caused it?

"We have nothing more to say about the move"<p>Not publicly, anyway. Which I commend. If it was anything but amicable, there's plenty other people willing to sling mud on that guy for them.

Maybe b/c pando is a total bust and he doesn't need to be a part of it. Even the site design makes it hard to read. I figure if there's something ever good on there I can read it here.

Arrington is a joke<p>TechCrunch is a joke<p>PandoDaily is a joke and has a hideous design.