15 点作者 liorgrossman超过 1 年前

Last week, I got seriously fascinated by the new GPT-4 Vision API introduced on OpenAI DevDay, so I decided to build a UX Audit tool with this API.It's pretty simple to use - just go to <a href="https://flawless.is" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://flawless.is</a> and enter your homepage or landing page URL.I'm using the urlbox API to get a screenshot of your page, then I utilize GPT-4V to analyze the screenshot, find potential usability and conversion issues, suggest fixes, and highlight the relevant areas in the screenshot (although the position is sometimes inaccurate).Last week, I launched it on Hacker News (<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38207892">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38207892</a>), but I wasn't ready for the 20,000 visitors that came next... Unfortunately, GPT-4V has a rate limit of 100 events daily, so almost no one could use the service - EPIC FAIL.To manage demand, I now priced the service at $1.99 (still less than a cup of coffee), which should keep the demand at bay, and also cover the costs of GPT-4V, the screenshot API, and hosting.As a proof of concept, there are some demo audits on the homepage you can click and check out.Please let me know your thoughts and suggestions on how to improve it!

5 条评论

imranhou超过 1 年前

The feedback for Slack is a hit and miss, for example it considers the signup buttons too small, or customer logos too small - is there an issue with its perception or mine? Additionally down below it says button color matches background which isn't true, but other sister buttons may be, which is misleading. At the end of this, I think some parts are useful, but not sure by how much when I have to sift through and ignore the other parts....Is it possible to adjust the prompts to address some of this? or have a second to run validate the output?

评论 #38269405 未加载

artur_makly超过 1 年前

Any Senior UX folks here that can review the quality recommendations shown on the audit results posted on this site? A quick glance shows some dubious suggestions. Still better than no UX audit.

评论 #38286310 未加载

评论 #38271695 未加载

Broiling3167超过 1 年前

It is not clear what aspect of the payment is "one time", please clarify this!Is it per-domain or per-email?Rerunning the same domain takes me to checkout again, and I didn't receive an email so I'm lost.

评论 #38269349 未加载

user_named超过 1 年前

I paid for this and tried it on one of our main pages.It did identify one point that is correct and that I have brought up with the team previously, and we are currently fixing it.So either points like fine print being too small I think we're not correct and it doesn't understand the use of such a section.Also the screenshot is of the page not loaded correctly.

评论 #38352849 未加载

11217mackem超过 1 年前

is the prompt any more sophisticated than? "do a ux audit on this page with the format "problem" and "solution" with tags messaging, cro, usability, marketing, etc"or rather, significantly more?this seems super, super simple.

评论 #38352928 未加载