TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

ChatGPT has 190 citations on Google Scholar

55 点作者 georgehill超过 1 年前

12 条评论

crazygringo超过 1 年前
The actual article generating all 190 citations:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;link.springer.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;10.1007&#x2F;s12195-022-00754-8" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;link.springer.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;10.1007&#x2F;s12195-022-00754-8</a><p>&gt; &quot;Author&#x27;s note: This article was written by the ChatGPT chatbot, in response to prompts from MK. That human-chatbot conversation is presented here, without editing.&quot;
评论 #38290034 未加载
评论 #38290291 未加载
评论 #38290188 未加载
daveguy超过 1 年前
This is one paper with 190 citations and one paper with no citations.<p>The paper is only 2 pages in a prompt-response format, un-edited. The prompts are specific and ask for paragraphs about chatbots, AI and plagiarism. The author&#x27;s note at the end, after ChatGPT was asked for references and gave several, is:<p>&gt; Author’s note: These are not real references, unfortunately.<p>Edit: One more point -- Even though it was published in Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering it really doesn&#x27;t have to do with either. It&#x27;s a quick read.
cod3rboy超过 1 年前
Is it right to recognize ChatGPT as a scholar? Shouldn&#x27;t we just treat it like any other software tool?
评论 #38290236 未加载
评论 #38290388 未加载
评论 #38290245 未加载
Cenk超过 1 年前
They’re all from this paper, which is written by ChatGPT with some prompts from the author: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;oa.mg&#x2F;work&#x2F;10.1007&#x2F;s12195-022-00754-8" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;oa.mg&#x2F;work&#x2F;10.1007&#x2F;s12195-022-00754-8</a>
ziyao_w超过 1 年前
190 citations sounds impressive but considering they mostly come from possibly the two fields that gathers citations the quickest - biomedical sciences and artificial intelligence - this shouldn&#x27;t be too surprising?<p>Shalosh B. Ekhad, OTOH, is the real deal -<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sites.math.rutgers.edu&#x2F;~zeilberg&#x2F;ekhad.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sites.math.rutgers.edu&#x2F;~zeilberg&#x2F;ekhad.html</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Doron_Zeilberger" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Doron_Zeilberger</a>
candiddevmike超过 1 年前
Is this the beginning of the LLM ouroboros? Does ChatGPT do anything different with training data it produced?
评论 #38289980 未加载
dkjaudyeqooe超过 1 年前
A paper produced by ChatGPT is plagiarism taken to its logical extremity.
WolfOliver超过 1 年前
I&#x27;ve wrote some thoughts on this topic down a few months ago:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.monsterwriter.app&#x2F;chatgpt-in-academic-writing.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.monsterwriter.app&#x2F;chatgpt-in-academic-writing.ht...</a>
topbanana超过 1 年前
First listing: &#x27;ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?&#x27;
jdorfman超过 1 年前
I love “World Renowned Scholar”.
clutch89超过 1 年前
ChatGPT - World Renowned Scholar
评论 #38289816 未加载
评论 #38290019 未加载
gumballindie超过 1 年前
Ah great, so they are now spamming everything. Not long ago that was illegal.