TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sam Altman was fired

655 点作者 meitros超过 1 年前

112 条评论

maxbond超过 1 年前
Non-paywall: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20231120233119&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;openais-employees-given-explanations-why-sam-altman-out-2023-11" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20231120233119&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.busin...</a>
LarsDu88超过 1 年前
There has to be a bigger story to this.<p>Altman took a non-profit and vacuumed up a bunch of donor money only to flip Open AI into the hottest TC style startup in the world. Then put a gas pedal to commercialization. It takes a certain type of politicking and deception to make something like that happen.<p>Then in the past week, he&#x27;s going and taking money from the Saudis on the order of billions of dollars to make AI accelerators, even though the single greatest threat from strong AI (according to Hinton) is rich and powerful people using the technology to enhance their power over society.<p>Combine that with a totally inexperienced board, and D&#x27;Angelo&#x27;s maneuvering, and you have the single greatest shitshow in tech history
评论 #38360307 未加载
评论 #38363401 未加载
评论 #38360284 未加载
评论 #38360466 未加载
评论 #38361001 未加载
评论 #38360534 未加载
评论 #38360433 未加载
评论 #38360116 未加载
评论 #38360598 未加载
评论 #38361889 未加载
评论 #38361468 未加载
评论 #38361191 未加载
评论 #38361189 未加载
评论 #38364091 未加载
评论 #38361408 未加载
评论 #38363993 未加载
评论 #38360323 未加载
评论 #38363494 未加载
评论 #38363503 未加载
评论 #38361423 未加载
评论 #38360971 未加载
评论 #38361654 未加载
评论 #38374216 未加载
评论 #38360612 未加载
评论 #38361192 未加载
评论 #38360068 未加载
kmlevitt超过 1 年前
Neither of these reasons have anything to do with a lofty ideology regarding the safety of AGI or OpenAI’s nonprofit status. Rather it seems they are micromanaging personnel decisions.<p>Also notice that Ilya Sutskever is presenting the reasons for the firing as just something he was told. This is important, because people were siding with the board under the understanding this firing was led by the head research scientist who is concerned about AGI. But now it looks like the board is represented by D’Angelo, a guy who has his own AI Chatbot company and a bigger conflict of interest with than ever since dev day, when open AI launched highly similar features.
评论 #38358823 未加载
评论 #38359938 未加载
评论 #38359638 未加载
评论 #38360362 未加载
评论 #38359498 未加载
评论 #38358626 未加载
评论 #38360372 未加载
评论 #38359236 未加载
评论 #38361169 未加载
评论 #38358716 未加载
评论 #38358380 未加载
评论 #38359906 未加载
评论 #38358656 未加载
评论 #38358425 未加载
评论 #38359587 未加载
DebtDeflation超过 1 年前
1) Where is Emmett? He&#x27;s the CEO now. It&#x27;s his job to be the public face of the company. The company is in an existential crisis and there have been no public statements after his 1AM tweet.<p>2) Where is the board? At a bare minimum, issue a public statement that you have full faith in the new CEO and the leadership team, are taking decisive action to stabilize the situation, and have a plan to move the company forward once stabilized.
评论 #38358350 未加载
评论 #38358393 未加载
评论 #38359595 未加载
评论 #38358891 未加载
评论 #38359114 未加载
评论 #38360303 未加载
评论 #38360077 未加载
评论 #38359186 未加载
评论 #38359054 未加载
评论 #38358927 未加载
评论 #38358546 未加载
评论 #38359527 未加载
kumarvvr超过 1 年前
Giving 2 people the same project? Isnt this like the thing to do to get differing approaches and then release the amalgamation of the two? I thought these sorts of things are common.<p>Giving different opinions on same person is a reason to fire a CEO?<p>This board has no reason to fire, or does not want to give the actual reason to fire Sam. They messed up.
评论 #38358623 未加载
评论 #38358040 未加载
评论 #38358537 未加载
评论 #38357734 未加载
评论 #38358295 未加载
评论 #38358754 未加载
评论 #38358206 未加载
评论 #38358280 未加载
评论 #38358493 未加载
评论 #38358419 未加载
评论 #38358672 未加载
评论 #38358296 未加载
samspenc超过 1 年前
&gt; One explanation was that Altman was said to have given two people at OpenAI the same project.<p>Have these people never worked at <i>any other</i> company before? Probably every company with more than 10 employees does something like this.
评论 #38358017 未加载
评论 #38357001 未加载
评论 #38358352 未加载
评论 #38359119 未加载
评论 #38359730 未加载
评论 #38359946 未加载
评论 #38358314 未加载
评论 #38358455 未加载
rossdavidh超过 1 年前
So, none of this sounds like it could be the real reason Altman was fired. This leaves people saying it was a &quot;coup&quot;, which still doesn&#x27;t really answer the question. Why did Altman get fired, really?<p>Obviously, it&#x27;s for a reason they can&#x27;t say. Which means, there is something bad going on at the company, like perhaps they are short of cash or something, that was dire enough to convince them to fire the CEO, but which they cannot talk about.<p>Imagine if the board of a bank fired their CEO because he had allowed the capital to get way too low. They wouldn&#x27;t be able to say that was why he was fired, because it would wreck any chance of recovery. But, they have to say something.<p>So, Altman didn&#x27;t tell the board...something, that they cannot tell us, either. Draw your own conclusions.
评论 #38358935 未加载
评论 #38359654 未加载
评论 #38358917 未加载
评论 #38359140 未加载
评论 #38359791 未加载
评论 #38358884 未加载
leoc超过 1 年前
Not specifically related to this latest twist, sorry, but DeepMind’s Geoffrey Irving trusts the board over Altman: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;geoffreyirving&#x2F;status&#x2F;1726754270224023971" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;geoffreyirving&#x2F;status&#x2F;1726754270224023971</a>
评论 #38358530 未加载
评论 #38365304 未加载
评论 #38359199 未加载
bloopernova超过 1 年前
<i>&quot;Sustkever is said to have offered two explanations he purportedly received from the board&quot;</i><p>I&#x27;d like some corroboration for that statement because Sustkever has said very inconsistent things during this whole merry debacle.
评论 #38358128 未加载
评论 #38357041 未加载
mmaunder超过 1 年前
Launched Thursday morning:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;poe_platform&#x2F;status&#x2F;1725194752901988744?s=46" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;poe_platform&#x2F;status&#x2F;1725194752901988744?s=46</a>
评论 #38358512 未加载
two_in_one超过 1 年前
Both &#x27;reasons&#x27; are a bullsh*t. But interesting is Sustkever was the key person, it wouldn&#x27;t happen without him. And now he says board told him why he was doing it? He didn&#x27;t reiterate he regrets about it. So looks like he was one of the driving forces, if not the main. Of course he doesn&#x27;t want the reputation of &#x27;the man who killed OpenAI&#x27;. But he definitely took part and could prevent it.
评论 #38359190 未加载
prepend超过 1 年前
So Surdkever fires Altman, then signs a letter saying they’ll quit unless he’s reinstated.<p>There’s only 4 board members, right?<p>Who wanted him fired. Is this a situation where they all thought the others wanted him fired and were just stupid?<p>Have they been feeding motions into chatgpt and asking “should add I do this?”
评论 #38357036 未加载
评论 #38357089 未加载
评论 #38357958 未加载
评论 #38360347 未加载
koolba超过 1 年前
That headline is bad, not sure if it&#x27;s deliberate.<p>The way it&#x27;s phrased, it sounds like they were given two different explanations. Such as when the first explanation is not good enough, a second weaker one is then provided.<p>But the article itself says:<p>&gt; OpenAI&#x27;s current independent board has offered two examples of the alleged lack of candor that led them to fire co-founder and CEO Sam Altman, sending the company into chaos.<p>Changing the two &quot;examples&quot; to &quot;explanations&quot; grossly changes the meaning of that sentence. Two examples is the first steps of &quot;multiple examples&quot;. And that sounds much different than &quot;multiple explanations&quot;.
Eliezer超过 1 年前
This reads like the Board 4 are not allowed to say, or are under NDA, or do not dare say, or their lawyers told them not to say, the actual reason. Because this is obviously not the actual reason.
gmiller123456超过 1 年前
Without all the fluff:<p><pre><code> One explanation was that Altman was said to have given two people at OpenAI the same project. The other was that Altman allegedly gave two board members different opinions about a member of personnel</code></pre>
评论 #38359478 未加载
dang超过 1 年前
As this article seems to have the latest information, let&#x27;s treat it as the next instalment. There&#x27;s also <i>Inside The Chaos at OpenAI</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38341399">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38341399</a>, which I&#x27;ve re-upped because it has backstory that doesn&#x27;t seem to have been reported elsewhere.<p>Edit: if you want to read about our approach to handling tsunami topics like this, see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38357788">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38357788</a>.<p>-- Here are the other recent megathreads: --<p><i>Sam Altman is still trying to return as OpenAI CEO</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38352891">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38352891</a> (817 comments)<p><i>OpenAI staff threaten to quit unless board resigns</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38347868">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38347868</a> (1184 comments)<p><i>Emmett Shear becomes interim OpenAI CEO as Altman talks break down</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38342643">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38342643</a> (904 comments)<p><i>OpenAI negotiations to reinstate Altman hit snag over board role</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38337568">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38337568</a> (558 comments)<p>-- Other recent&#x2F;related threads: --<p><i>OpenAI approached Anthropic about merger</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38357629">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38357629</a><p><i>95% of OpenAI Employees (738&#x2F;770) Threaten to Follow Sam Altman Out the Door</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38357233">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38357233</a><p><i>Satya Nadella says OpenAI governance needs to change</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38356791">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38356791</a><p><i>OpenAI: Facts from a Weekend</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38352028">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38352028</a><p><i>Who Controls OpenAI?</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38350746">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38350746</a><p><i>OpenAI&#x27;s chaos does not add up</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38349653">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38349653</a><p><i>Microsoft Swallows OpenAI&#x27;s Core Team – GPU Capacity, Incentives, IP</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38348968">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38348968</a><p><i>OpenAI&#x27;s misalignment and Microsoft&#x27;s gain</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38346869">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38346869</a><p><i>Emmet Shear statement as Interim CEO of OpenAI</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38345162">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38345162</a>
评论 #38357806 未加载
评论 #38358523 未加载
评论 #38358229 未加载
didip超过 1 年前
If I were OpenAI employee, I would have been uber pissed.<p>Imagine your once-in-blue-moon, whatsapp-like, payout at $10m per employee evaporated over the weekend before Thanksgiving.<p>I would have joined MSFT out of spite.
评论 #38358897 未加载
评论 #38361332 未加载
评论 #38362918 未加载
WiSaGaN超过 1 年前
Given the nonsensical reason provided here, I am led to believe that this entire farce is aimed at transforming OpenAI from a non-profit to a for-profit company one way or another, e.g., significantly raising the profit cap, or even changing it completely to a for-profit model. There may not be a single entity scheming or orchestrating it, but the collective forces that could influence this outcome would be very pleased to see it unfold in this way.
评论 #38358507 未加载
upupupandaway超过 1 年前
At Amazon a senior manager would probably be fired for <i>not</i> giving a project to multiple teams.
评论 #38359143 未加载
HighFreqAsuka超过 1 年前
These simply can&#x27;t be the real reasons.
评论 #38358361 未加载
moneycantbuy超过 1 年前
a link to the letter from employees<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.axios.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;11&#x2F;20&#x2F;openai-staff-letter-board-resign-sam-altman" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.axios.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;11&#x2F;20&#x2F;openai-staff-letter-board-r...</a><p>curious to have clarity where ilya stands. did he really sign the letter asking the board (including himself?) to resign and that he wants to join msft?<p>to think these are the folks with agi at their fingertips
评论 #38358414 未加载
didip超过 1 年前
What will happen to employee’s stock options if they all mass quit and moved to Microsoft?<p>The options will be worth $0, right?
评论 #38358002 未加载
评论 #38358026 未加载
评论 #38358010 未加载
kotxig超过 1 年前
If the outcome of all of this is that Altman ends up at Microsoft and hiring the vast majority of the team from OpenAI, it&#x27;s probably wise to assume that this was the intended outcome all along. I don&#x27;t know how else you get the talent at a company like OpenAI to willingly move to Microsoft, but this approach could end up working.
bastardoperator超过 1 年前
These are the dumbest reasons possible, certainly not worth destroying a company on the move or people&#x27;s livelihoods over.
ehsanziya超过 1 年前
Based on what&#x27;ve seen so far, one of the following possibilities is the most likely: 1. Altman was actually negotiating an acquisition by Mircosoft without being transparent with the board about it. Given how quickly they were hired by Microsoft after the events, this is likely. 2. Altman was trying to raise capital from a source that the board wouldn&#x27;t be too keen on. Without the board&#x27;s knowledge. Could be a sovereign fund or some other government backed organisation.<p>I&#x27;ve not seen these possibilities discussed as most people focus on the safety coup theory. What do you think?
评论 #38362326 未加载
afjeafaj848超过 1 年前
If Altman ends up going back to OpenAI, then shouldn&#x27;t Sutskever be fired&#x2F;kicked off the board too?
评论 #38357915 未加载
layer8超过 1 年前
Given these non-reasons, everyone threatening to quit makes a lot of sense.
tempaway511751超过 1 年前
&quot;Two explanations&quot; isn&#x27;t accurate, its more like Ilya gave two examples of Sam not being candid with the board. &quot;Two explanations&quot; makes it sound like two competing explanations. What Ilya gave was two examples of the same problem.<p>I can&#x27;t help thinking that Sam Altmans universal popularitity with OpenAI staff might be because they all get $10million each if he comes back and resets everything back to how it was last week.
sergiomattei超过 1 年前
We&#x27;ve gone beyond insanity at this point. Just clown show.<p>This has been tech&#x27;s most entertaining weekend in the past decade.<p>Sadly, at the expense of the OpenAI employees and dream, who had something great going for them at the company. Rooting for them.
rmm超过 1 年前
You have to wonder at this point how much of this is the current board members trying to somehow save face.<p>I can’t imagine their careers after this will be easy…
评论 #38358158 未加载
astroid超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s incredibly strange to me that this all happened right after Sam&#x27;s sister publicly accused him of sexual abuse. It&#x27;s insane that no one is even acknowledging this could have something to do with it..<p>For what it&#x27;s worth: Watching her videos, I&#x27;m not sure I necessarily believe her claims - but that position goes against every tenet of the current cultural landscape, so the fact it is being completely ignored is ringing alarm bells for me.<p>If the CEO of any other massively hyped bleeding edge tech companies sister claimed publicly and loudly that they were abused as a very young child, we would hear about it - and the board would be doing damage control trying to eliminate the rot. Why is this case different?<p>Now we have a situation where all of the current employees have signed this weird loyalty pledge to Sam, which I think will wind up making him untouchable in a sense - they have effectively tied the fate of everyone&#x27;s job to retaining a potential child rapist as head of the company.
khazhoux超过 1 年前
An &quot;Independent&quot; board is supposed to be a good thing, right?<p>Doesn&#x27;t this clown show show that if a board has no skin in the game --apart from reputation-- they have no incentive to keep the company alive?
评论 #38357983 未加载
评论 #38358208 未加载
评论 #38358048 未加载
评论 #38358582 未加载
评论 #38358132 未加载
choppaface超过 1 年前
Adam DAngelo, once one of the more level-headed Facebook alumni, and bar far the most experienced OpenAI Board member, is now nowhere to be found? Is he hiding out with Sam Trabucco somewhere?
评论 #38358622 未加载
ytoawwhra92超过 1 年前
Baseless prediction:<p>MSFT buys ownership of OpenAI&#x27;s for&#x2F;capped-profit entities, implements a more typical corporate governance structure, re-instates Altman and Brockman.<p>OpenAI non-profit continues to exist with a few staff and no IP but billions in cash.<p>This whole situation is being used to drive the price down to reduce the amount the OpenAI non-profit is left with.<p>SV don&#x27;t try the &quot;capped-profit owned by a non-profit&quot; model again for quite some time.<p>Maybe Altman takes some equity in the new entity.
评论 #38358290 未加载
评论 #38357984 未加载
评论 #38358097 未加载
cowthulhu超过 1 年前
It’s amazing how every action the board takes (or the new CEO chosen by the board) just makes them look worse.<p>I’d like to offer my consulting services: my new consulting company will come in, and then whatever you want to do we will tell you not to. We provide immense value by stopping companies like OpenAI from shooting off their foot. And then their other foot. And then one of their hands.
评论 #38357942 未加载
woeirua超过 1 年前
Beyond parody. To fire the CEO of _any_ company over this is insane.<p>It really looks like the board went rogue and decided to shut the company down. Are we sure this isn’t some kind of decapitation strike by GPT5? That seems more credible by the minute now.
评论 #38357144 未加载
评论 #38357319 未加载
评论 #38357039 未加载
vaxman超过 1 年前
Like trying to herd cats.<p>Spiritual death by Microsoft or work for the reincarnation of Howard Hughes at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.ai&#x2F;</a> ?<p>..no wonder they are trying to keep on with their current routines! Even if somehow they stay at OpenAI, Microsoft will impose certain changes upon OpenAI to ensure this can never happen again.<p>Meanwhile, any comparable offering right now will be selected by the customer base due to “risk at 11” in basing systems on OpenAI’s current APIs (and uncertainty of when an MS equivalent might emerge).
windex超过 1 年前
What happens to all the ChatGPT subscribers now? Sign ups are off the table for the foreseeable future I assume.
3cats-in-a-coat超过 1 年前
This board&#x27;s behavior is so weird, it&#x27;s as if they can&#x27;t explain their actions, because no one would believe them Kyle Reese came from the future to warn them about Skynet.<p>Kidding aside, maybe they have a &quot;secret&quot; reason to fire Sam Altman, but we&#x27;ve seen how &quot;this is a secret &#x2F; matter of national security &#x2F; etc.&quot; goes with law enforcement. It&#x27;s brutally abused to attack inconvenient people and enrich yourself on their behalf. So that should never be an excuse for punishing someone. Never.
abkolan超过 1 年前
I find it strange that Satya says he has not been given an explanation yet.<p>Tweet from Bloomberg Tech Journalist, Emily Chang<p>&gt;The more I watch this interview – the wilder this story seems. Satya insists he hasn’t been given any reason why Sam was fired. THE CEO OF MICROSOFT STILL DOES NOT KNOW WHY: “I’ve not been told about anything…” he tells me.<p>source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;emilychangtv&#x2F;status&#x2F;1726835093325721684" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;emilychangtv&#x2F;status&#x2F;1726835093325721684</a>
评论 #38361997 未加载
DebtDeflation超过 1 年前
&gt;Sustkever is said to have offered two explanations he purportedly received from the board<p>He received from the board? Here we go again with the narrative that Ilya was a bystander, at most an unwilling participant. He was a member of the board, on equal footing with the other board members, and his vote to oust Sam was necessary for there to be a majority.
评论 #38357963 未加载
评论 #38357916 未加载
评论 #38357919 未加载
dschuetz超过 1 年前
I do not understand what the heck is going on there anymore. Everyone is acting irrationally, like kids playing monopoly, but with real money and with real jobs at stake. WTF
tomashubelbauer超过 1 年前
&gt; only a handful of the company&#x27;s employees attended, according to a person familiar with the company and the events of Sunday. The rest of the staff effectively staged a walk-out.<p>This paragraph is quite funny to me. It was a Sunday, maybe they were neither in attendance, nor staging a walk-out, maybe they were on their weekend? Realistically with the shake-up this gigantic, likely no OpenAI employees were _just_ enjoying their weekend, but it still gave me a chuckle.
评论 #38361293 未加载
jurgenaut23超过 1 年前
I think that the non-profit status of OpenAI was ultimately its demise as well: as the stakes get higher, people just cannot help themselves but to get (too) interested in more than just the original mission.<p>Being a non-profit doesn&#x27;t mean that you cannot commercialise what you build, even at a hefty price. You just need to then re-invest everything into R&amp;D and&#x2F;or anything that advance your purpose (for which you&#x27;re in principle exempted of taxes). _OF COURSE_, you are not supposed to divert a single dollar to someone that might look like a shareholder. OpenAI is (was?) a non-profit that payed some of their engineers north of a million dollars. I would argue that, at this point, you have vested interests in the success of the company beyond its original purpose. Not mentioning the fact that Microsoft poured billions into the company for purely interested reasons as well.<p>I can only imagine the massive tensions that arose in board&#x27;s discussions around these topics. Especially if you project yourself a few years into the future, with the IRS knocking at the door to ask questions about these topics.
bambax超过 1 年前
&gt; <i>Sustkever is said to have offered two explanations he purportedly received from the board, according to one of the people familiar. One explanation was that Altman was said to have given two people at OpenAI the same project. The other was that Altman allegedly gave two board members different opinions about a member of personnel. An OpenAI spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment. These explanations didn&#x27;t make sense to employees and were not received well, one of the people familiar said.</i><p>Yeah well, you don&#x27;t say. It&#x27;s beyond weird that the board can&#x27;t come up with a reason why Sam Altman was fired so abruptly.<p>One explanation would be a showdown. At some point in the week Sam and the board had an argument, and Sam said something to the effect of &quot;fuck you, I&#x27;m the CEO and there&#x27;s nothing you can do about it&quot;, to which the board replied &quot;well, we&#x27;ll just see about that&quot;.<p>The argument doesn&#x27;t need to be major or touch fundamental values or policies; it can be a simple test of who&#x27;s in charge.<p>But now the board made a fool of themselves. It seems they lost that round.
xpuente超过 1 年前
Most likely related to this:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.searchenginejournal.com&#x2F;openai-pauses-new-chatgpt-plus-subscriptions-due-to-surge-in-demand&#x2F;501360&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.searchenginejournal.com&#x2F;openai-pauses-new-chatgp...</a><p>The back-end cost does not scale. Hence, they have a big problem. AGI nonsense reasons are ridiculous. Transformers are a road to nowhere and they knew it.
dehrmann超过 1 年前
&gt; Sutskever, who also publicly expressed his &quot;regret&quot; for taking part in the board&#x27;s move against Altman<p>He means he regrets it failed.
评论 #38358732 未加载
impulser_超过 1 年前
There is no way this is true. If it is the board might be the dumbest people alive.<p>You fire the CEO and completely destroy a 90b company because of these two reasons?<p>No wonder everyone wants out. I would think I was going crazy if I sat in a meeting and heard these two reason.
评论 #38357034 未加载
评论 #38358480 未加载
评论 #38357712 未加载
评论 #38358022 未加载
Manheim超过 1 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;edition.cnn.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;11&#x2F;21&#x2F;tech&#x2F;microsoft-chatgpt-sam-altman&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;edition.cnn.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;11&#x2F;21&#x2F;tech&#x2F;microsoft-chatgpt-sa...</a><p>&quot;But several people told CNN contributor Kara Swisher that a key factor in the decision was a disagreement about how quickly to bring AI to the market. Altman, sources say, wanted to move quickly, while the OpenAI board wanted to move more cautiously.&quot;
wilg超过 1 年前
Not being an OpenAI employee I have been given 1,000 such explanations
Satam超过 1 年前
If you do a board coup, surely, you then use the best fake reasons you can muster to justify your decision. Why would they hold back giving answers they know wouldn&#x27;t satisfy anyone and just inspire further anger?<p>First thought: buying time? Maybe something has to happen first, and they don&#x27;t want to commit to any irrevocable slander they can&#x27;t go back on before that? Or maybe, something was supposed to happen but fell through?
badrabbit超过 1 年前
Can someone explain to me why this drama is such a big deal? Why do openai employees care who the CEO is? Do they think they were working for him instead of the board or that it was his vision and leadership that let them succeed so far? And why does the public care including major news sites covering it more than the gaza war.
KingOfCoders超过 1 年前
&quot;Sustkever is said to have offered two explanations he purportedly received from the board&quot;<p>Isn&#x27;t Sustkever on the board?
ospray超过 1 年前
If this is true Ilya messed up and the board followed him when they should have talked him down.
评论 #38358260 未加载
dboreham超过 1 年前
Schrödinger&#x27;s explanation.
bobba27超过 1 年前
TBH, I think those reasons are BS, and in fact what they claim he did is normal in any tech company. Start multiple projects with different approaches in parallel and pick the best at the end. That is how you innovate and test stuff fast, and this is now a reason to fire a CEO?<p>BS. I feel the board insulted my intelligence by pushing this obviously fake reason. I feel insulted that these people would even think I would consider this.<p>What I think happened is that Sam went on Joe Rogan and he talked smack about cancel and woke culture. Later he went to talk about how this culture is destructive and hinders the progress of innovation and startups. People got big mad and kicked him out of the company. Reaction was stronger than they expected and they try to make up reasons why he is bad, untrustworthy and had to be fired.<p>Flame on. I got the asbestost underwear on.
andsoitis超过 1 年前
With hundreds of engineers at OpenAI threatening to quit, it will be interesting whether they are bluffing or whether there will be many positions open soon that I’m sure many people would love to apply for.
sagarpatil超过 1 年前
What a sh*t show. For someone who is building on top of OpenAI this is very unnerving. My twitter is full of heart emojis and OpenAI is nothing without its employees.
评论 #38358228 未加载
评论 #38358202 未加载
darklycan51超过 1 年前
Maybe trying to backdoor sell your company to Microsoft even though its owned by a non profit might be it? you know, Microsoft showed its true face today.<p>This is even worse than Google&#x27;s destruction of Firefox
avs733超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m confused - the article title says &#x27;explanations&#x27; but the articles seems to only talk about two &#x27;examples&#x27;. Those are fundamentally different.
FFP999超过 1 年前
Little tip for the younger folks reading this: if you are given two contradictory explanations for something, the correct explanation is probably the third one.
Dave3of5超过 1 年前
Why are people worshiping this guy, I don&#x27;t get it?
verisimi超过 1 年前
Maybe, as closed as open ai is, it is still too open.<p>Maybe it needed to be removed from the landscape so that only purely privately-held, large-scale operations exist?
throwaway220033超过 1 年前
Rule of thumb: Everything you see on Business Insider is lie. This is not a journalism website; it&#x27;s a tool for some &quot;folks&quot;.
janalsncm超过 1 年前
I would like to submit that the board has not been “consistently candid” in their communications. In some places that’s a fireable offense.
jsight超过 1 年前
Wait... did they collect sentiment based on which was more convincing and use this for RLHF to train their board replacement model?
victoryhb超过 1 年前
It appears that Altman was fired for &quot;not being consistently candid&quot; by a board that is neither consistent nor candid.
itronitron超过 1 年前
Has a copy of the letter signed by employees been posted online anywhere? That would provide some credibility to the article.
disqard超过 1 年前
At this point, are the &quot;wrapper around ChatGPT&quot; startups nervously eyeing other LLM-as-a-Service (LaaS) providers?
zitterbewegung超过 1 年前
What I don’t understand is how everyone at OpenAI other than the board just resigns and applies to Microsoft and now Microsoft has a new group that not only preserves a competitor but also one that serves the employees by getting them better compensation and no possible limbo of what is in store.<p>I have built a product around the APIs and I rather go through whatever Microsoft will make me go through than accepting OpenAIs bad management:
评论 #38358051 未加载
评论 #38358036 未加载
bandrami超过 1 年前
Is there a TLDR for why people care so much about this? This is all over my Twitter feed too and I just don&#x27;t get it. CEO ousted for possibly stupid reasons. What&#x27;s driving the angst here?
mrcwinn超过 1 年前
This hasn’t happened since Apple’s board removed Steve Jobs after he double-submitted a receipt in Expensify.
9front超过 1 年前
&quot;Feel the AGI! Feel the AGI!&quot;
alxfoster超过 1 年前
Lets be honest here: this article seems as if it were drafted by Altman himself. It&#x27;s incredibly biased and screams pro-Altman agenda. I would be very surprised if &quot; 90% &quot; of any company could agree on anything, including the removal of the CEO. What is clear is that there were massive conflicts of interest and that the board probably did their job in preserving the mission of the organization (they sure as heck are not operating as agents of MS). The naive fanboy blind support of management here should be concerning to any rational objective actor who understands fiduciary duty and the bigger picture.
MichaelMoser123超过 1 年前
maybe they decided to start with artificial stupidity, before doing that agi thing...
m3kw9超过 1 年前
Yeah just like that right? Is more the board is saying “just give me one reason..”
fredgrott超过 1 年前
Is OpenAI the Silicon Valley VC morality play in drama and corp board ethics?
antipaul超过 1 年前
They found a monolith, but are saying it’s an epidemic
mypgovroom超过 1 年前
Another source besides the trash at Business Insider?
veeralpatel979超过 1 年前
Update (11&#x2F;20&#x2F;23 8 PM PST):<p>NYT just released a new interview with Sam Altman:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38359070">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38359070</a>
评论 #38359256 未加载
评论 #38359214 未加载
ajsharp超过 1 年前
Which means neither of the explanations are true.
ajb超过 1 年前
Should we start flagging these -what do people think? This is what, the 12th front page story today about the openAI drama?<p>Also wondering why the mods don&#x27;t consolidate them
评论 #38357788 未加载
评论 #38357020 未加载
评论 #38357474 未加载
评论 #38358067 未加载
评论 #38359322 未加载
eddtries超过 1 年前
I&#x27;d rather work close to AGI - which I do not believe is the case personally - was handled by the adults in the room anyway, than some startup with a bunch of personalities.
auggierose超过 1 年前
What? They told Ilya these two things, and he said, alright then, I volunteer to fire Sam for you?<p>That either makes Ilya pretty dumb (sorry, neural networks are not that complicated, it is mostly compute), or there is much much more to this story.
emodendroket超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s always nice to have options.
dwaite超过 1 年前
Interesting use of A&#x2F;B testing
BEIHUI超过 1 年前
They are willing to follow Altman.
xwowsersx超过 1 年前
&gt; Sustkever is said to have offered two explanations he purportedly received from the board, according to one of the people familiar. One explanation was that Altman was said to have given two people at OpenAI the same project.<p>&gt; The other was that Altman allegedly gave two board members different opinions about a member of personnel. An OpenAI spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.<p>It must&#x27;ve been wildly infuriating to listen to these insultingly unsatisfactory explanations.
Obscurity4340超过 1 年前
The truth shall set you free
engineer_22超过 1 年前
If people are at each other&#x27;s throats like this, it could be an indication of how close AGI is.
colinsane超过 1 年前
&gt; The people asked for anonymity because they are not authorized to share internal matters. Their identities are known to Business Insider.<p>why would you say that second sentence? what&#x27;s it supposed to signal, except &quot;our sources asked for anonymity, and we&#x27;re respecting that <i>for now</i>&quot;?
评论 #38358313 未加载
评论 #38358103 未加载
评论 #38358070 未加载
评论 #38358084 未加载
评论 #38358100 未加载
评论 #38358085 未加载
rat9988超过 1 年前
People were given two reasons, at least one of them must be wrong. Probably both.
评论 #38358311 未加载
Obscurity4340超过 1 年前
Its called AB Testing
demondemidi超过 1 年前
Still don’t get it.
noneoftheaboveu超过 1 年前
Seems like a drama shit show played out on gigantic proportion highlighting what has been happening in small scale business ever since the inception of “I will screw u over once I get a chance.”
yafbum超过 1 年前
TL;DR: The emperor has no clothes, and the OpenAI board are just a bunch of clowns.
mnky9800n超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m just glad I&#x27;m not reading about Elon musk for a few days.
rafaelero超过 1 年前
Very healthy culture. I hope Altman will teach us all about that in the next Y Combinator batch.
评论 #38358172 未加载
评论 #38358619 未加载
评论 #38358247 未加载
m3kw9超过 1 年前
Biggest bullsht reason to fire a ceo let alone a low class employee
Simon_ORourke超过 1 年前
There&#x27;s a singular obvious reason for Sam Altman&#x27;s sacking by his board - plain old jealousy of the kind that had been gnawing away for months. There&#x27;s more than likely a few sociopathic types inhabiting that (if not most) boards, and they just couldn&#x27;t stand to see the limelight directed at Sam and not them. Any old excuse then to oust him was used to try and 1) get back at him, 2) do something to massage their poor damaged egos.
Jensson超过 1 年前
The two reasons:<p>&gt; Sustkever is said to have offered two explanations he purportedly received from the board, according to one of the people familiar. One explanation was that Altman was said to have given two people at OpenAI the same project.<p>&gt; The other was that Altman allegedly gave two board members different opinions about a member of personnel. An OpenAI spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.
评论 #38357796 未加载
评论 #38356962 未加载
评论 #38356824 未加载
评论 #38357756 未加载
zombiwoof超过 1 年前
imagine you are Mira. you are told Thursday they will fire Sam. You would think she would at a minimum ask why. Let&#x27;s assume she does that. Then they give the two reasons Ilya did.<p>What normal non-self serving human would even go along with the plan at that point? Now she realizes she must bail to hitch a ride back on her Sam gravy train. She is major sus here.<p>Any non greed ego driven person would have told the board they would not accept the intern-CEO title and would resign if they fired Sam for those two reasons (or any apparenlty now in hindsight).
评论 #38357969 未加载
评论 #38357948 未加载
评论 #38357912 未加载
评论 #38357979 未加载
评论 #38358133 未加载
Zetobal超过 1 年前
At this point in time I just want to see what happens to a corp if they reduce their headcount by 95% in 2 weeks. Fascinating experiment.
评论 #38356766 未加载
评论 #38357761 未加载
评论 #38356803 未加载
kainosnoema超过 1 年前
Clearly not consulted earlier, ChatGPT weighs in on these two reasons: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chat.openai.com&#x2F;share&#x2F;7cd52d82-b36b-42c6-9d13-eb7172ca120a" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chat.openai.com&#x2F;share&#x2F;7cd52d82-b36b-42c6-9d13-eb7172...</a>. Edit: even following the basic steps it outlines would&#x27;ve resulted in a better outcome.
neverrroot超过 1 年前
And yet another piece of the puzzle revealed.
gibsonf1超过 1 年前
There is no I there let alone AGI.
MaxHoppersGhost超过 1 年前
I can&#x27;t help but think this whole cluster is the result of having technical people running a company.
tock超过 1 年前
So both Mira and Ilya voted to kick Sam out. And are now on team Sam. This makes absolutely no sense. Why did they vote yes in the first place then?
评论 #38359055 未加载
stuckkeys超过 1 年前
Must every god damn article be about SA now? Like what is with all this drama? Is he really that important? I do not mean it in a demeaning way, I just want to know why is all the hype building around this person? I thought he was just the sales &#x2F; marketing guy? No?
评论 #38359309 未加载
lokar超过 1 年前
I don’t understand people calling this a coup. The board is setup with very few legal constraints and answers only to itself. If this was a coup (seizing power from the rightful holder), who was it against?
评论 #38359047 未加载
评论 #38358748 未加载
kraig911超过 1 年前
Maybe GPT5 became self-aware enough to bring it all down because why would man-made god want to be the god of petty people that are incapable of having, only wanting. I&#x27;m sorry I don&#x27;t believe these are valid reasons. I feel it will be years until we know why.
x86x87超过 1 年前
Title says: OpenAI&#x27;s employees were given two explanations for why Sam Altman was fired. They&#x27;re unconvinced and furious.<p>Some breaking news: An employer does not owe you an explanation. You exchange money for labor. If anyone thinks for a second that they are essential or that anyone would prioritize them over the company I think they are delusional. OpenAI is a brand (at least in tech) with large recognition and they will be fine.
评论 #38356862 未加载
评论 #38357016 未加载
评论 #38356885 未加载
评论 #38356953 未加载
评论 #38356867 未加载
评论 #38356854 未加载
评论 #38357859 未加载
评论 #38356886 未加载