TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

RFC 9498 on the GNU Name System

142 点作者 stargrave超过 1 年前

6 条评论

nabla9超过 1 年前
A distributed naming system intended to work with mesh networks like GNUnet.<p>GNS does not support names which are simultaneously global, secure and human-readable. Instead, names are either global and not human-readable or not globally unique and human-readable. In GNS, each user manages their own zones and can delegate subdomains to zones managed by other users.<p>For example, ICANN could just create &#x27;DNS zone&#x27; that would embed DNS as a zone into GNS.
评论 #38364722 未加载
评论 #38364380 未加载
评论 #38362415 未加载
评论 #38362716 未加载
chrismorgan超过 1 年前
Note that this is in the Independent Submission stream, Informational category:<p>&gt; <i>This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its discretion and makes no statement about its value for implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by the RFC Editor are not candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.</i>
评论 #38362476 未加载
toomim超过 1 年前
Previous discussion of GNU Name System: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32222360">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32222360</a>
ggm超过 1 年前
I have mixed feelings. A unitary root of naming and the dns is a huge value proposition to walk away from. Fitting gnu names under .alt is only partly ameliorative.
评论 #38361898 未加载
评论 #38363923 未加载
Karrot_Kream超过 1 年前
Has anyone been following along with what the plan is for GNS? An RFC is quite cool but are there any zones being distributed over GNS to play around with?
评论 #38363951 未加载
pierrelf超过 1 年前
Cool! Seems similar to Handshake domains?
评论 #38361333 未加载