TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

ZFS 2.2.1: Block Cloning disabled due to data corruption

135 点作者 turrini超过 1 年前

9 条评论

terinjokes超过 1 年前
Reporter of #15526 here. I've still only ever seen this corruption in files being built, which seems to be a situation that the race can be won repeatably by some packages. I reviewed all my user data and I've found no corruption to it, but my workloads don't involve block clones.
评论 #38383477 未加载
评论 #38382765 未加载
thrtythreeforty超过 1 年前
I was glad for this feature to land, but being conservative with my main storage array, I decided not to immediately jump on this. Prudence pays off I guess.<p>That said, for my main workstation, I plan to migrate to bcachefs very quickly once it&#x27;s mainlined. I haven&#x27;t done enough introspection to be able to tell you why I can hold both opinions in my head so well.
评论 #38381481 未加载
评论 #38380687 未加载
评论 #38380545 未加载
评论 #38380639 未加载
mnd999超过 1 年前
This wasn’t the only block cloning bug. They also completely broke cp from unencrypted to encrypted by cloning unencrypted blocks into the encrypted file system.
评论 #38382139 未加载
veidr超过 1 年前
NOTE: This situation is worse than it seemed when this thread landed on HN; see also <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38405731">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38405731</a>
antongribok超过 1 年前
This is why you should always have proper backups, and a great reminder that snapshots are not backups.
评论 #38410580 未加载
giantg2超过 1 年前
I was excited to try zfs on a separate disk with Ubuntu, until I screwed up my windows boot... guess sit will be a while before I get to try it while I fix my mess.
papichulo2023超过 1 年前
Am I the only waiting for real write cache on ssds (not just ram)?
m4r1k超过 1 年前
ZFS is undeniably impressive – I first started using it back in 2009 with OpenSolaris. This year, motivated mainly by the power consumption of my previous OmniOS setup, I made the move to the &quot;dark side&quot; with Synology. After more than a decade of relying on ZFS, I must admit, the transition to something less rigid but still robust has been quite refreshing.<p>It could be a subjective feeling, but the recent years of OpenZFS development have reminded me a bit of the OpenStack experience. It seemed like almost anyone could contribute, sometimes resulting in features that were questionable in terms of stability, development, and overall thoughtfulness. Perhaps this is why iXsystems has taken a more cautious (albeit slower) approach in enabling new features in TrueNAS.
评论 #38384985 未加载
评论 #38389562 未加载
评论 #38380885 未加载
评论 #38380997 未加载
davisr超过 1 年前
How the heck did this ever make it through? I don&#x27;t think this ever would have happened pre-OpenZFS, and undermines the stable reputation of ZFS. OpenZFS needs to do better and look to FreeBSD developers, not Linux developers, as role models.
评论 #38382266 未加载
评论 #38381122 未加载
评论 #38381471 未加载
评论 #38384523 未加载
评论 #38383942 未加载
评论 #38381114 未加载