TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Windows NT: Peeking into the Cradle

102 点作者 jmmv超过 1 年前

10 条评论

jmmv超过 1 年前
Original author here.<p>Back in September, I got the recommendation to read the &quot;Showstopper!: The Breakneck Race to Create Windows NT and the Next Generation at Microsoft&quot; book from some other comment thread here in HN. I don&#x27;t exactly remember which thread that was though... but learning about the history of Windows NT sounded interesting, so I bought the book right away and have been slowly reading through it over the last three months.<p>The story in the book seemed so exciting (and messed up) that I ended up writing a &quot;book review&quot; with commentary on various topics that caught my attention. The details might not be super-precise, but they are hopefully enough to paint the right picture in its context. I thought you might enjoy it due to where I got the suggestion from!
评论 #38448381 未加载
评论 #38452912 未加载
评论 #38447861 未加载
评论 #38446720 未加载
causality0超过 1 年前
There&#x27;s an almost mystical air about the era of Windows when Microsoft was focused on world domination through offering a genuinely better product. I still remember sitting on my bed totally transfixed during the install when I moved from 95 to 98.
评论 #38448407 未加载
评论 #38450150 未加载
aap_超过 1 年前
Recently a build from april 1991 showed up: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;betawiki.net&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Windows_NT_3.1_April_1991_build" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;betawiki.net&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Windows_NT_3.1_April_1991_build</a>
mise_en_place超过 1 年前
&gt; From reading the book, I learned that Cutler had the same mentality for his OS and, in fact, the system wasn’t ported to x86 until late in its development.<p>The reason for this is that the RISC architectures at the time (MIPS, Alpha AXP, PPC) had weird ISAs. There are things like branch delay slots and MIPS in particular required aligning to a 32-bit boundary (x86 does not). Dave Plummer has a YT channel and I highly recommend his interview with both Dave Cutler and Raymond Chen. It was a lot of work to port to these other architectures, and they didn&#x27;t have source control at the time, so they were hand merging these changes.
评论 #38451179 未加载
Springtime超过 1 年前
Easy to read article, in part thanks to the choice of mid-tone blue background and pleasant serif typeface. Kind of refreshing when one is used to just white&#x2F;dark themes.<p>One typo that could be fixed:<p><i>&gt; a couple paragraphs are completely unreadable due to broken grammar, punctuation, and capitaliazation</i> [sic]
ThinkBeat超过 1 年前
FreeBSB and its cousins were not started from scratch but descended from a stable UNIX.<p>Microsoft was really trying hard to win a huge contact with DOD (If memory serves). They worked along with DEC for the contract and planned to sell computers based on DEC Alpha + WindowsNT. The POSIX compatibility subsystem was added specifically because the DOD contact demanded such a feature.<p>Sadly (for them) they did not win the contract.<p>The DOD was not the reason Microsoft developed Windows but some of the features and archtetures were in respons to features demanded.
tambourine_man超过 1 年前
&gt;These days we take x86-based personal computers as the one and only possibility<p>The author must not like Macs :)
Unfrozen0688超过 1 年前
NT really has stood the test of time. Still runs on Windows 11. I am weary about the future though.
评论 #38452952 未加载
Triangle9349超过 1 年前
I remember when the source code leaked for Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 online in 2020. It was a lot of fun to dig around.
evntdrvn超过 1 年前
icymi, Dave Cutler&#x27;s got a great YouTube channel!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;@DavesGarage" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;@DavesGarage</a>
评论 #38450108 未加载
评论 #38450137 未加载
评论 #38450116 未加载