TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Computer Scientists Build Computer Using Swarms of Crabs - Technology Review

41 点作者 sakai大约 13 年前

6 条评论

richardk大约 13 年前
The title seems pretty misleading: it seems they only built an AND and an OR gate, I wouldn't really call a couple of logic gates a <i>Computer</i>.<p>Still, building logic gates using crabs, very good. :)
wdewind大约 13 年前
It takes the author to the end of the piece to admit that no, in fact, they did not build a computer using swarms of crabs. Right after he admits it's false he, he asserts it is true again...really...link baity bad writing for an MIT blog.<p><i>"To be fair, the results were mixed. While Gunji and co found they could build a decent OR gate using soldier crabs, their AND-gate was much less reliable.<p>However, it's early days and they say it may be possible to produce better results by making conditions inside the computer more crab-friendly. (No crabs were harmed in the making of their computer, say Gunji and co.)<p>So there you have it--a computer in which the information carriers are swarming balls of soldier crabs."</i>
Tichy大约 13 年前
I know what I'll be building next time I visit the sea side. No more sand castles...
noonespecial大约 13 年前
Somewhere Charlie Stross is smiling widely.
betawolf33大约 13 年前
"The first is theoretical--ordinary computers are hugely energy inefficient--some eight orders of magnitude worse than is theoretically possible. "<p>Eh? Is this saying that ordinary computers are eight orders of magnitude more energy-inefficient than the maximum possble inefficiency?<p>Oh, wait, they mean the other possibility.<p>Also, as others mention, they only build two gates, and one of them doesn't work very well.
dsrguru大约 13 年前
I'm waiting for the NAND or NOR gate...
评论 #3843854 未加载