TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The De-Evolution of UX Design

36 点作者 eimaj大约 13 年前

3 条评论

nullflux大约 13 年前
Not quite sure this applies too much in startupland. There does appear to be a shift away from traditional IA practices with most startup designers, but largely because it takes too damn long and really isn't that necessary.<p>Proper IA/wireframing/signing-off-on-steps is good for companies where a clueless management is going to make myriad changes to information hierarchy or UI bits along the way, because you have a "we talked about this already and you agreed" defense when some clueless marketing guy comes over and says things need to be bigger, this link needs to be here because it's his friend's company, etc.<p>A lot of what this article is proposing is missing (organizational hierarchy, an understanding of the order of information) is something that I don't really think is missing in a good tech-company designer's head. He or she is often one of few in control of that domain, and the product roadmap is often known quite a bit in advance. A lot of the polar bear book's 1000+ pages ends up getting turned into heuristics, when quick decisions and fast iteration under multivariate testing is often better off for a young company than sitting back and doing some type of holistic, IDEO-class set of mental exercises.
评论 #3848650 未加载
评论 #3848378 未加载
jmount大约 13 年前
One thing I have always disliked about UX design is the name. Frankly reading "user experience design" is a much better user experience for me than reading "UX design." The bad first impression always makes me wonder what other garishnesses will be in the project due a need to seem hip.
评论 #3847883 未加载
ThomPete大约 13 年前
<a href="http://000fff.org/getting-to-the-customer-why-everything-you-think-about-user-centred-design-is-wrong/" rel="nofollow">http://000fff.org/getting-to-the-customer-why-everything-you...</a><p>For some more thoughts on what is wrong with the field. (shameless plug)