TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The extremely large telescope will transform astronomy

86 点作者 jdkee超过 1 年前

7 条评论

danparsonson超过 1 年前
My biggest concern is that telescopes will soon hit a fundamental size limit when we run out of adjectives for naming them - I posit 'Inconceivably Large Telescope' to be the maximum.
评论 #38554525 未加载
评论 #38562836 未加载
评论 #38555392 未加载
评论 #38557247 未加载
评论 #38555145 未加载
评论 #38564320 未加载
评论 #38554389 未加载
评论 #38555368 未加载
评论 #38554594 未加载
评论 #38554765 未加载
评论 #38598308 未加载
评论 #38564449 未加载
评论 #38557428 未加载
评论 #38560043 未加载
评论 #38555825 未加载
评论 #38554360 未加载
jdkee超过 1 年前
See <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;89jLA" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;89jLA</a>
评论 #38556396 未加载
irjustin超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m super excited by all these new prospects.<p>With Starship and ..... SLS...... anyway.... coming online I&#x27;m extremely excited at the prospects of reusing JWST concepts&#x2F;tech on larger arrays or larger single mirrors. A whole new upper limit of space telescopes unlocked.
评论 #38555871 未加载
评论 #38556472 未加载
diracs_stache超过 1 年前
I think these engineering marvels whose FWHM (sorry I&#x27;m a bit rusty on what the right parameter for light gathering ability in this application) will be leaps ahead of current instrumentation is important. But have the science missions it will host (spectrographs etc.) received the same attention? Along those lines follow up observations are critical, for the groundbreaking work done at the bleeding edge meter class instruments at universities&#x2F;labratories&#x2F;observatories are needed too (also grad students,researchers, data reduction etc.)
marcyb5st超过 1 年前
I am looking forward for when we can ship an aragoscope to space. I believe the tech is already there (actually simpler compared JWST). A 1KM one could resolve Jupyter moons from 23 light years away [1]. PBS has a great video regarding this [2].<p>I mean, shipping an origami of light and bendy material should be easier than making an origami of super delicate mirrors that have to be micrometers tolerances and be cooled to few K to operate.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2017&#x2F;03&#x2F;2014_phase_i_webster_cash_the_aragoscope.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2017&#x2F;03&#x2F;2014_phase_i...</a> Figure 17<p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=BIASPc89Sgk" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=BIASPc89Sgk</a>
obblekk超过 1 年前
Now that it’s been operational for a while, I would love to see an analysis of the James Webb to determine if there’s diminishing knowledge returns to size.<p>I worry a bit the cost of something like this may be better spent on other space exploration efforts which will yield more knowledge.<p>For instance, voyager 3?
评论 #38557345 未加载
评论 #38556464 未加载
rereasonable超过 1 年前
Careful, we might bump the skybox soon...