TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Escaping Poverty Requires Almost 20 Years with Nearly Nothing Going Wrong (2017)

79 点作者 safaa1993超过 1 年前

9 条评论

arp242超过 1 年前
What things like this miss is that we can&#x27;t all be rulers of the queen&#x27;s navy. That is: we can&#x27;t all be computer programmers and marketing executives and doctors and whatnot. We actually do need the cleaners, and farm hands, and landscapers, and people at Tesco, and so forth and so forth.<p>Anti-poverty efforts that focus mainly on education kind of miss this, IMHO. And sure, these efforts and not useless especially in the context of entire communities being impoverished, but <i>someone</i> will have to do those jobs regardless, and the problems are so much deeper.
评论 #38640717 未加载
评论 #38641040 未加载
评论 #38640787 未加载
评论 #38641642 未加载
评论 #38663069 未加载
strken超过 1 年前
Kinda annoying that they compare FTEs against the size of the whole population and not against the labour market. It doesn&#x27;t change the conclusion, but it&#x27;s probably close to a quarter or a third of workers, given the LFPR is usually 60-something%.<p>Including kids, retirees, anyone with a medical condition or disability, etc. in the other 80% isn&#x27;t accurate, since a retired FTE or the child of two FTEs belongs in the top class still, and the permanently disabled or chronically unemployed are in a different situation.
jcarrano超过 1 年前
Excellent! 200 years ago escaping poverty was not possible, 100 years ago it took a couple generations and now a mere 20 years.
评论 #38641628 未加载
评论 #38640763 未加载
评论 #38642206 未加载
评论 #38647958 未加载
评论 #38641738 未加载
webmaven超过 1 年前
Article is from 2017.<p>Non-paywall link: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;2Dcrc" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;2Dcrc</a>
Ujjawal_Gupta超过 1 年前
Depends upon the country ig
n_ary超过 1 年前
Paywall removed: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;2Dcrc" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;2Dcrc</a><p>Also, article is from 2017.
mildchalupa超过 1 年前
Link for article without paywall?
qp11超过 1 年前
Decent living standards (affordable quality housing&#x2F;health&#x2F;edu&#x2F;transport&#x2F;energy) + reduced inequality between the top and the bottom should not be hard to achieve if its declared as an actual Goal.<p>Technology causes Price of Goods and Services to fall. Not rise. Yet the Fed says its inflation target is 2% which means Prices are always supposed to grow no matter what innovation happens or its speed. This makes no sense.<p>If living standards rise and debt levels drop due to increasing efficiencies and productivity then we should allow Prices to fall. Wont that take care of inequality and living standards?
评论 #38638106 未加载
评论 #38638148 未加载
评论 #38638799 未加载
评论 #38638296 未加载
评论 #38637946 未加载
评论 #38642297 未加载
评论 #38637949 未加载
silexia超过 1 年前
False. In industries with low levels of government regulation you can move very quickly out of poverty. It is only in areas where existing businesses obtain regulatory capture (meat processing, medical, etc) and prevent competition that social mobility goes down.<p>I went from poor to rich in 5 years after starting my website development service company. Lots and lots of things went wrong ranging from mistakes I made (drinking too much, hiring my girlfriend who made life a nightmare then sued me later, nepotism hiring my brother, being a bad manager at first, and many other issues).
评论 #38641988 未加载
评论 #38642069 未加载
评论 #38642459 未加载