TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Threads Is Testing ActivityPup Integration

26 点作者 camjohnson26超过 1 年前

8 条评论

schmichael超过 1 年前
I’m anxious but hopeful for this. I’ve left Twitter and enjoy Mastodon. I’d hate to see Meta destroy it, intentionally or not.<p>I want to believe federated systems can work even with extreme asymmetries in participants. I think if federated systems can’t, they’re forever doomed to obscurity.<p>Don’t get me wrong: obscurity has its benefits. Mastodon feels a lot like 2010 Twitter, and I love that. However I’d also love for federated systems to work for mainstream audiences.
zoul超过 1 年前
While ActivityPup is endearing, can we fix the typo to ActivityPub? :)
评论 #38638393 未加载
评论 #38638395 未加载
NullInvictus超过 1 年前
I’m not really excited about this; Meta has no strong incentive to be a long term good neighbor in the fediverse, but plenty of incentive to engage in poor behavior. No matter how sincere or well meaning leadership is now, a quarterly loss or stagnant profit will eventually push them to turn to some market capture or embrace, extend, extinguish behavior.<p>I’m not the only one who feels this way. A number of instances are prepping to partially or fully block Threads from the get-go.<p>Even without Meta, I’m not excited for another 1M+ instance. My experience is that the larger an instance is, the worse it is. Less community, worse moderation, more bad actors hiding in plain sight. You just can’t toss people into a generalist million people scrum and expect them to form a digital community.<p>If you’re on mastodon.social, you’re not experiencing the best of the fediverse IMO. Find a small instance of your interest (&lt;500 people) and interact with the local timeline. People on my instance recognize me, make in jokes, I chat with the admin and mods, it’s like actual digital neighborhood. It’s really the closest we’ve gotten back to forums and I don’t think dumping a bucket of FAANG-style corporate water on it is the answer.
评论 #38638729 未加载
0x49d1超过 1 年前
Wow, this was a pleasant surprise. Now need 2way integration, so that Threads can see posts from Mastodon instances too. But what&#x27;s the real reason for Meta to do that? Other clients will not show their ads like the official Threads client in the future... Maybe they just need to be &quot;good guys&quot; now, 3rd party with &quot;&lt; 0.1%&quot; share are &quot;OK&quot;. Anyway: good to see distribution here.
评论 #38638454 未加载
ChrisArchitect超过 1 年前
[dupe]<p>Earlier: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38631751">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38631751</a>
Hamuko超过 1 年前
Am I correct to assume that significant amount of Mastodon instances will not federate with Threads and that I&#x27;ll still need a handful of ActivityPub accounts in order to access everything?
评论 #38638506 未加载
tlow超过 1 年前
Who?
isodev超过 1 年前
I really don&#x27;t get why people keep inviting this kind of abuse in their lives. Regardless of who owns it, oligarch.net doesn&#x27;t deserve your eyeballs.<p>Luckily, my instance put an end to it faster than one can say &quot;domain block&quot;.