TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

OpenAI employee: GPT-4.5 rumor was a hallucination

82 点作者 georgehill超过 1 年前

10 条评论

atleastoptimal超过 1 年前
My theory is that they're using a fine-tuned version of GPT-4-turbo in ChatGPT to fix the issue with everyone saying it was lazy. They fine-tuned it using responses from GPT-4.5-turbo, which they have internally. This synthetic data was probably based on a suite of questions which included self-identification, leading to it releasing its model name in the training data, and the new ChatGPT less lazy model is adopting the name via osmotic data leakage.
评论 #38677259 未加载
评论 #38678038 未加载
评论 #38677708 未加载
评论 #38677283 未加载
minimaxir超过 1 年前
Quoting myself from the previous thread: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38675055">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=38675055</a><p>&gt; As usual, LLMs will hallucinate if you ask it about itself.<p>&gt; &#x2F;r&#x2F;ChatGPT is getting worse about that somehow.
评论 #38678414 未加载
评论 #38677186 未加载
ilrwbwrkhv超过 1 年前
I wonder how many of these are made up stories to get some free marketing. All the world tour about &quot;oh so dangerous AI&quot; was purely marketing as anyone even remotely associated with AI would know. This feels similar. &quot;Such a weird hallucination. Hmm. Does Chat GPT want to grow?&quot; Cue the Techcrunch articles.
评论 #38677405 未加载
评论 #38677207 未加载
评论 #38677274 未加载
评论 #38677328 未加载
aeturnum超过 1 年前
<i>&gt; I wonder if putting &quot;You are GPT-4.5-turbo&quot; in the system prompt improves performance</i><p><i>&gt;&gt; quite possible</i><p>I love this! I love the idea that we are in an age where, by accident, our technology pays attention to the energy we invest into its potential futures. It is also very silly? It seems absurd - but perhaps we live in absurd times.
评论 #38677850 未加载
评论 #38677839 未加载
评论 #38677885 未加载
评论 #38677900 未加载
评论 #38679454 未加载
hotpotamus超过 1 年前
I have to say that watching computers hallucinate and convince people of wrong information based on those hallucinations is not what I dreamed about doing in this industry as a kid and a young adult. I just wanted to make video games and after that I just wanted to use technology to make things more efficient for people. I now wish I would have gone to medical school.
评论 #38677368 未加载
评论 #38677845 未加载
评论 #38678800 未加载
评论 #38677719 未加载
whatever1超过 1 年前
Sure, we will not be able to verify anyway. Whatever garbage the LLMs are throwing at us, we have no clue if they are truthful.
评论 #38678201 未加载
评论 #38683895 未加载
I_am_unique6435超过 1 年前
yep seems to be the prompt in itself: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;OpenAI&#x2F;comments&#x2F;18kl8zs&#x2F;the_gpt_45_mania_is_a_result_of_the_prompt_not&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;OpenAI&#x2F;comments&#x2F;18kl8zs&#x2F;the_gpt_45_...</a>
jrm4超过 1 年前
Calling &quot;wrong&quot; things from these &#x27;hallucinations&quot; strikes me as one of these deceptively weird technical falsehoods (that perhaps end up having a slightly different meaning?) I&#x27;m reminded of e.g. &quot;deleting&quot; tweets.
评论 #38678405 未加载
nextworddev超过 1 年前
No offense but the employee seems pretty rank and file
ShamelessC超过 1 年前
I hadn’t even heard that rumor yet…
评论 #38677492 未加载