TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A closer look at e/OS: Murena's privacy-first 'deGoogled' Android alternative

116 点作者 MilnerRoute超过 1 年前

14 条评论

SubzeroCarnage超过 1 年前
&#x2F;e&#x2F;OS falls significantly behind the other alternative Android systems with regards to privacy and security.<p>Please see this independent comparison table: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eylenburg.github.io&#x2F;android_comparison.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eylenburg.github.io&#x2F;android_comparison.htm</a><p>And additionally the reviews by Kuketz: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.kuketz-blog.de&#x2F;android-grapheneos-calyxos-und-co-unter-der-lupe-custom-roms-teil1&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.kuketz-blog.de&#x2F;android-grapheneos-calyxos-und-co...</a><p>See also my table that shows historical release dates for monthly Android Security Bulletins: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;divestos.org&#x2F;misc&#x2F;a-dates.txt" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;divestos.org&#x2F;misc&#x2F;a-dates.txt</a><p>and the Chromium (WebView): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;divestos.org&#x2F;misc&#x2F;ch-dates.txt" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;divestos.org&#x2F;misc&#x2F;ch-dates.txt</a>
评论 #38717612 未加载
评论 #38722791 未加载
评论 #38718561 未加载
DirkH超过 1 年前
I used to use CalyxOS till GrapheneOS got Google Place Sandbox working. Now there is nothing I can&#x27;t get working on GrapheneOS. Everything works including Google Pay. I just have a user profile for when I need to use an app that needs Google and otherwise my main user profile is just apps that work without Google.<p>To me this is leagues ahead of any other degoogled experience because at any time I can temporarily turn on Google when I need it (and I often do). But it doesn&#x27;t defeat the purpose because for the most part you can just turn it off
评论 #38718159 未加载
评论 #38718230 未加载
评论 #38719941 未加载
评论 #38718932 未加载
评论 #38718014 未加载
评论 #38718408 未加载
neilv超过 1 年前
Noteworthy related work the article missed: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grapheneos.org&#x2F;features" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grapheneos.org&#x2F;features</a>
unnouinceput超过 1 年前
Quote:&quot;“This feature is based on tracker detection. Facebook&#x2F;WhatsApp technically don’t use trackers so they are green flagged regarding privacy,” Murena offered when we queried the high score for the Facebook app, adding: “We will improve this score by adding more information about personal data collection that can be found in apps Terms of Services.”&quot;<p>Oh, OK then. Hard pass from me for this little experiment. Coming from a former communist country this is the equivalent of &quot;I guess if the neighbor is not using video to rat you to state police he&#x27;s a good guy and you can trust him with your anti-communist ideas&quot; attitude. The river bed of Danube-Black Sea channel is ridden with the bones of people who trusted their neighbors.
pjmlp超过 1 年前
&gt; So this is where the dream of deGoogling Google Android breaks down into a series of compromising glitches.<p>Yep, and this is why most people won&#x27;t care.
评论 #38718049 未加载
TheNightman超过 1 年前
Have these folks done any sort of actual audit on the Android code base to ensure they’ve removed _all_ of the “phoning home”? Not so much doubting their claims, more so just curious to see what they found. Is it possible google has baked in some tracking features deep in the OS, outside of gapps? Things you wouldn’t see with a mitm proxy? I’d be interested to know
评论 #38717344 未加载
eloisant超过 1 年前
What I&#x27;m wondering is: if I want to use Google Calendar and Google Maps, do I get any benefit in using a &quot;deGoogled&quot; Android?<p>Or by activating the Play Store and installing a couple Google apps, am I negating all the privacy benefits I would get from a deGoogled Android?
评论 #38718820 未加载
yellow_lead超过 1 年前
&gt; One account for your privacy<p>&gt; Your @murena.io account is at the center of the your private digital life, allowing you to store, back up and retrieve your data safely on remote servers.<p>Not very private
评论 #38722388 未加载
评论 #38718022 未加载
Vinnl超过 1 年前
Weird - I have the exact same FP4+&#x2F;e&#x2F;OS combination, and it doesn&#x27;t feel laggy at all for me. Granted, I&#x27;ve never had a top-line phone, but still.
userbinator超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m not sure if they had this in mind when they came up with the name, but &#x2F;e&#x2F; is indeed best visited in privacy.
评论 #38717914 未加载
DeathArrow超过 1 年前
Why not just use LineageOS?
评论 #38717925 未加载
评论 #38717906 未加载
johnea超过 1 年前
Been running e&#x2F;OS for about a year.<p>I still prefer a straight-up linueageOS install...
pshirshov超过 1 年前
In my opinion, GrapheneOS is superior in every aspect.
badrabbit超过 1 年前
.
评论 #38718645 未加载