> <i>There is no need to accept demographic decline as the price of prosperity.</i><p>For a very questionable definition of <i>prosperity</i>. (and <i>decline</i> as a value proposition instead of a simple numeric one is <i>also</i> a bit of a prejudgement)<p>My recommendation for a prosperity which would extend to the XX portion of the population: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38651927">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38651927</a><p>Edit: I guess a way around the fundamental unfairness of this proposal would be to follow the principle of "one cuts, the other chooses". If men propose the pie must be unequally portioned, the women should get to decide whether they get the small or the big piece.