A Readable Conway's Game of Life

Very cool, and nice code. Just to be pedantic (I mean it in the best way), this isn't quite literate programming.<p>A very basic explanation would be: literate programming is the result of writing a program in a sort of psuedo-code that explains the program in the order of the programmer's thoughts, and then running it through a compiler of sorts which "untangles" the literate program and outputs machine-readable code.<p>The linked post is nicely formatted and well-documented "regular" code.

The simplest version (and by my yard-stick is the de-facto measure of "readability") I've seen was at Pycon 2012 (<a href="http://azd325.github.com/Python/2012/03/23/pycon-2012-stop-writing-classes/" rel="nofollow">http://azd325.github.com/Python/2012/03/23/pycon-2012-stop-w...</a> around 17:30). The main take away that is demonstrated is that classes aren't necessary to write this program but it's the first thing most programmers reach for when implementing it.<p>Another thing I find a lot these days are an abundance of comments that explain what the code already explains. Some of the comments are good in this example, but many of them explain what I would know if I just read the code.<p>However, I do like the use of color! A great demonstration. Good work. :)

Reminds me of an even more reabable coffeescript example posted a year ago on HN: <a href="http://willbailey.name/conway/docs/conway.html" rel="nofollow">http://willbailey.name/conway/docs/conway.html</a>

And, conversely, an unreadable Game of Life in one line of APL (with explanation): <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9xAKttWgP4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9xAKttWgP4</a>

I've been working on a sculpture project[1] based on cellular automaton for the past two semesters. It's not exactly conway's game of life as I'm mostly focused on polygonal cells. Hardware wise it's mostly just LEDs with shift registers and an ATtiny85 but the code[2] might be interesting to some, in particular dealing with figuring out what cells are and aren't neighbors when you have an ambiguous layout. I've also put together an Android simulator[3] I use for exploring ideas that defines designs using JSON but I've put a lot less work into it.<p>[1] <a href="http://wollw.github.com/automaton-avr/" rel="nofollow">http://wollw.github.com/automaton-avr/</a><p>[2] <a href="https://github.com/Wollw/Cellular-Polymaton" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Wollw/Cellular-Polymaton</a><p>[3] <a href="https://github.com/Wollw/Polymaton" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Wollw/Polymaton</a>

Oh what the heck, because we're all sharing our Conways Attempts here is mine: <a href="https://github.com/JAStanton/conways-game-of-life" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/JAStanton/conways-game-of-life</a><p>And the live version: <a href="http://www.jastanton.com/experiments/conways-game-of-life/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jastanton.com/experiments/conways-game-of-life/</a><p>Mine acts more like a game, you can start and stop with 's' and enter draw mode with 'd' and draw on the cells.

somewhat unrelated: The most beautiful implementation of life that I have ever seen is this 7 line Clojure one. It really turned me on to the value of using data structures that match the problem well.<p><a href="http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2011/08/19/conways-game-of-life/" rel="nofollow">http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2011/08/19/conways-game-of-life/</a>

Another idea for colors is to use progressively more transparent pixels for older generations. Add a bit of a hue shift and it renders some really beautiful decay visualizations.

Good job. I enjoyed looking at the output from an artistic point of view.

nice implementation! The color adds a lot of visual interest. Here's my monochrome implementation.<p><a href="http://wsb.im/conway/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://wsb.im/conway/index.html</a>