Perhaps this is a bit "old man yells at cloud", and this is not particularly directed at you (as I see it all over the Internet these days) but I've grown to despise the use of fake, AI-generated "stock images" for sites like this. They make me want to get off the Internet altogether.<p>The reason, though, that I think it's <i>especially</i> bad for your project is because the whole purpose of your site is to try something <i>new</i>. I like the saying "Be brave enough to be bad at something new". So many of us get into a vein (often subconsciously) of always comparing ourselves to others because basically all of the examples we see online are the 0.001% experts that make it to the top of some feed algorithm. So, for example, why use a "perfect model specimen", complete with fake veins, for your "Bouldering" example, <a href="https://www.whataaabout.com/imgs/bouldering.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.whataaabout.com/imgs/bouldering.png</a>? Why use a "Hallmark card perfection" example of a (fake) smiling grandmother and her daughter, <a href="https://www.whataaabout.com/imgs/familyTree.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.whataaabout.com/imgs/familyTree.png</a>, for "Creating a family tree"? An almost fairytale scene for "Scavenger Hunt", <a href="https://www.whataaabout.com/imgs/scavengerHunt.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.whataaabout.com/imgs/scavengerHunt.png</a> (though apparently some of the cars in the lower right are about to be sucked into another dimension).<p>Your site should be about people embracing the joy of the <i>reality</i> of doing something new, not more fantasy land bullshit that doesn't exist.<p>Sorry, will get off my soapbox now and go back to eating my soup.