TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Outlook/Hotmail is no longer blocking my mail server

196 点作者 unclet超过 1 年前

20 条评论

huhtenberg超过 1 年前
We go through this every few months. Here&#x27;s the recipe -<p>1. Visit <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;olcsupport.office.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;olcsupport.office.com&#x2F;</a> and submit the complaint.<p>2. Wait for the auto-reply, followed by the &quot;Nothing was detected&quot; email.<p>3. Reply to the latter with &quot;Escalate&quot; in the body.<p>Within a day, they hammer shit in place and the block is removed.
评论 #38793857 未加载
评论 #38795841 未加载
albertgoeswoof超过 1 年前
I run a small transactional email provider (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mailpace.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mailpace.com</a>), our IPs are very rarely added to blocklists- but we are very strict on what we allow through our service, and surprisingly we’ve had no long term delivery issues with any of the big providers.<p>So thanks to the federated&#x2F;decentralized design of email, is totally possible to be part of the network without any special privileges.<p>We are sending millions of emails every day though, which is quite different to sending a couple hundred personal emails a week. If you’re running this on a cloud host, expect to be blocked by default. However if you can find a small vps provider you’ll have better luck on sending yourself.
评论 #38795138 未加载
评论 #38795963 未加载
评论 #38797362 未加载
评论 #38794680 未加载
shaicoleman超过 1 年前
Outlook&#x2F;Hotmail blocks DigitalOcean. After half a dozens attempts over the years to delist my IP, and following all the best practices (dedicated fixed IP, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, FCrDNS, zero spam, TLS, etc.) I gave up.<p>Eventually, most people realize that their Outlook&#x2F;Hotmail email service is defective because they&#x27;re not receiving emails, and they migrate to another email service.
评论 #38793014 未加载
评论 #38797859 未加载
评论 #38794744 未加载
评论 #38793645 未加载
评论 #38795765 未加载
评论 #38795772 未加载
评论 #38798348 未加载
评论 #38798401 未加载
StayTrue超过 1 年前
I had this problem for years. I would get the block lifted and it would return in short order. I surmise it’s because my mail server runs on a VPS and other users on my subnet are not well behaved (actually I know this for a fact).<p>I solved the problem by paying for a next hop SMTPS server as an upstream smarthost for non-local mails. That means my mails come from a subnet that fronts TONS of other servers&#x2F;domains. That makes it a bigger headache for MS to block.<p>Sad but there you go. I do not use the external service for inbound. Inbound mails come direct to my server per the MX.
评论 #38799652 未加载
评论 #38796238 未加载
abberation超过 1 年前
Wow, Outlook actually tells you they blocked you? My email (custom gmail domain btw) just ends up in the Spam folder of outlook clients with no notification at all.
评论 #38791518 未加载
评论 #38791596 未加载
评论 #38791574 未加载
sheikheddy超过 1 年前
I work on Microsoft&#x27;s anti-spam team, AMA!
评论 #38795329 未加载
评论 #38911341 未加载
评论 #38792945 未加载
评论 #38799729 未加载
评论 #38792676 未加载
评论 #38799753 未加载
评论 #38792914 未加载
评论 #38801689 未加载
评论 #38799220 未加载
评论 #38811984 未加载
WarOnPrivacy超过 1 年前
&gt;When I try to reply his message in my mail client, it received the following error message:<p>&gt; <i>Delivery to xxx@outlook.com failed with error: outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com. said:...</i><p>He got error messages? I get mail silently dropped.<p>MS drops mail from my reputable mail servers - and from rep svs that send mail to MS accts I manage.
Dunedan超过 1 年前
After many years of regularly getting blocked by Hotmail and outlook.com, I just decided to reject every incoming email from Hotmail and Outlook with an error message explaining the situation. If they don&#x27;t allow me to respond to emails sent by their customers, why would I allow them to send me emails in the first place?
评论 #38793691 未加载
评论 #38792963 未加载
TwoNineFive超过 1 年前
I run my own mail servers and hotmail and other Microsoft-based email services regularly blocks my mail by source IP on the various domains I run.<p>I&#x27;ve been using the same &#x2F;29 network for over 15 years now. There&#x27;s no nearby adjacent networks that are on any blacklists.<p>I monitor blacklists on a regular basis.<p>No marketing. The domains I run are strictly personal and projects. I monitor volume and all kinds of stuff. I know there&#x27;s nothing like spam or any kind of marketing going outbound.<p>It&#x27;s astonishing how honest Microsoft is when I send them an email telling them to unblock. They literally just admit that they never had reason to block the domain&#x2F;IP and they unlist it for a few years and then it goes back on their list.<p>It&#x27;s become apparent that they blacklist by default.<p>Fortunately I only run into the occasional idiot who uses Hotmail or live.com.
spoiledtechie超过 1 年前
GMail is the worst for email blocking resolutions. They don&#x27;t have an effective feedback loop built into their system. So when a user does block you, no one is told about it, to be fixed. Therefore lowering your reputation with them over time.<p>How can we as ESPs respond to them appropriately with removal of these people who don&#x27;t want our emails anymore, if we don&#x27;t know who the user is?<p>If there are any GMAIL service team members here, I would LOVE to know why a feedback loop was never implemented like the other providers.
评论 #38795502 未加载
评论 #38794483 未加载
vouaobrasil超过 1 年前
Running a mail server should be something anyone can do. And while this is cool, there are so many other problems to do it. It&#x27;s the price we pay of letting big tech companies control so much of the virtual infrastructure: big tech has commoditized the internet so much into a platform for consumerism that it becomes a valuable target for spam.<p>In my opinion, the internet would be much better if none of the big players ever entered it, including Google, Facebook, Yahoo, etc, and it would allow for many more decentralized and valuable commons like email.
评论 #38792191 未加载
评论 #38792076 未加载
评论 #38792463 未加载
评论 #38792122 未加载
brunnock超过 1 年前
I ran into this issue several years ago. After complaining, MS allowed me to send email to MS properties (hotmail, live.com), but continued to block my email to their Office 365 clients.<p>I now use AWS SES to handle mail delivery. It&#x27;s free for up to 200 daily messages which is fine for me.
tschumacher超过 1 年前
Maybe the big webmail providers are relying more on machine learning for filtering spam instead of blocking IP ranges these days.
评论 #38792050 未加载
V__超过 1 年前
Is this mira of a U.S. centric problem? I selfhost my mail in Germany, have one at a smaller mail provider and never had problems.<p>It is also not uncommon for companies to either have a local Exchange Server or use the mail service at their hosting provider. If everything is configured correctly, delivery works fine.
评论 #38792304 未加载
评论 #38792384 未加载
charles_f超过 1 年前
Side note - the privacy consent is downright aggressive. If you want to remove your consent you have to unselect 100+ checkboxes for each of the partners, whereas accepting is a simple &quot;accept all&quot;. I bypassed using reading mode, but darn...
throwawaaarrgh超过 1 年前
&gt; Maybe the fake contact information of my Microsoft Account make them worry that I am not a good guy.
beretguy超过 1 年前
What if I don’t have a blog?
issafram超过 1 年前
TL;DR emailed Microsoft a few times
freetanga超过 1 年前
I think that governments should offer one free email account per citizen for life. Which you could use or not, but is there for you as a digital inbox… which are the options?<p>- Self hosting is a bit elitist - not for the masses.<p>- A paid-for option (proton, tutta,…) would be cataloged as elitist. People perceive email as free.<p>- A free option provided by a Corporate player will gravitate towards monopolies and lack of privacy.<p>- A free for life government issued, easy to recover digital point of contact where all your government interactions are pointed towards would be a great step. You could still have a separate one if you don’t trust big brother, but at least your “recovery” address would be secure for life.
评论 #38792595 未加载
评论 #38793088 未加载
评论 #38792442 未加载
评论 #38792889 未加载
评论 #38793395 未加载
评论 #38792525 未加载
评论 #38792599 未加载
评论 #38793629 未加载
评论 #38792762 未加载
评论 #38793585 未加载
评论 #38792935 未加载
评论 #38792597 未加载
评论 #38793688 未加载
评论 #38792757 未加载
评论 #38792402 未加载
评论 #38793800 未加载
评论 #38793588 未加载
ostensible超过 1 年前
Why not avoid fighting these windmills by using any of the existing commercial mail relays for sending — like SES or mailchimp?
评论 #38797635 未加载