TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

New U.S. immigration rules spur more visa approvals for STEM workers

224 点作者 Metacelsus超过 1 年前

10 条评论

jmyeet超过 1 年前
There&#x27;s no changes that affect the real bottleneck: the annual quota on green cards and the per-country limits of 7% or children aging out. Those all require Congressional action and that&#x27;s just not going to happen in the current political environment [1].<p>Here&#x27;s my take: you get a work visa for 3-5 years that&#x27;s tied to your employer and allows you to freely leave and re-enter the US. Believe it or not, we still have visa holders that can&#x27;t leave the US without having to re-apply for their visa.<p>On renewal that becomes a 3-5 year visa that isn&#x27;t tied to your employer. You can freely change jobs.<p>At the end of that period, it just becomes a green card as long as you satisfy presence tests. Naturalization has continuous and physical presence tests. Just use those. Failing that it is simply renewed for another 3-5 years.<p>If you satisfy the extraordinary category or get a NIW you simply skip the first step of having an employer-tied visa.<p>This would free up USCIS to deal with actual visa fraud rather than all the pointless hoops they currently (are forced to) enforce.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;spectrumnews1.com&#x2F;oh&#x2F;columbus&#x2F;news&#x2F;2023&#x2F;12&#x2F;21&#x2F;congress-ineffective-2023" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;spectrumnews1.com&#x2F;oh&#x2F;columbus&#x2F;news&#x2F;2023&#x2F;12&#x2F;21&#x2F;congre...</a>
评论 #38794510 未加载
评论 #38800228 未加载
评论 #38794200 未加载
评论 #38795328 未加载
评论 #38797262 未加载
评论 #38798311 未加载
评论 #38796245 未加载
fnord77超过 1 年前
would love to see the breakdown by STEM field.<p>I&#x27;m guessing most are going toward computer programming&#x2F;support roles, but I could be wrong
评论 #38794182 未加载
评论 #38794430 未加载
FirmwareBurner超过 1 年前
<i>&gt;“You don’t have any accomplishments,” the lawyer told him. “You don’t have a patent, or even a product.” That scolding spurred Sanjay to make a list of what he needed to do to achieve his goal of staying permanently. He improved the technology his AI-based firm was developing, expanded its customer base, and filed for a U.S. patent, which was awarded earlier this year. In May those efforts paid off, allowing him to move from an O-1A to a EB-1 visa, which grants him permanent residency. </i><p>Question from non-USA-an here. I wonder if this will lead people to spam the patent office with low quality inventions hoping something will stick and help them secure a EB-1 visa.
评论 #38794135 未加载
评论 #38794075 未加载
评论 #38793969 未加载
评论 #38793977 未加载
评论 #38794008 未加载
评论 #38795131 未加载
评论 #38794550 未加载
评论 #38794978 未加载
评论 #38794270 未加载
评论 #38796295 未加载
评论 #38796416 未加载
lgleason超过 1 年前
Expect further downward pressure on US tech salaries.
评论 #38794179 未加载
评论 #38794087 未加载
评论 #38794084 未加载
评论 #38794137 未加载
评论 #38794047 未加载
评论 #38794116 未加载
评论 #38794156 未加载
评论 #38794276 未加载
评论 #38798382 未加载
评论 #38794030 未加载
评论 #38794028 未加载
评论 #38794100 未加载
danking00超过 1 年前
Watching friends work through the decades long journey of citizenship, going to prestigious undergrad institutions, getting PhDs, publishing in journals, teaching part-time while working full time in industry, all just to get the right to stay in the country they’ve lived since they were 18 is fucking depressing.<p>I doubt I’d qualify for EB-1 [1]. I’d have qualified for EB-2 at 28 when I attained five years of work experience [2][3]. If I didn’t have a BS I’d need ten years experience. If I had spent the usual five years flailing about in a PhD instead of dropping out early, I’d have delayed “work experience” another three years.<p>Now this hypothetical version of myself waits as short as two years (China-born) and as long as eleven years (India-born) to get an application considered. Meanwhile, they’re trying to maintain work authorization, either via the time-limited OPT or hopefully winning an H1-B which has its own highly competitive lottery. And when they finally get PR&#x2F;citizenship, their (now quite old) parents have no hope of receiving PR&#x2F;citizenship so they’ll probably be flying across oceans to care for them as they age.<p>All of this for the mistake of being born in the wrong part of the word.<p>Meanwhile, I’m some fuckup who happened to be born in the US who has never known struggle. It just all seems cosmically unfair.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.uscis.gov&#x2F;working-in-the-united-states&#x2F;permanent-workers&#x2F;employment-based-immigration-first-preference-eb-1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.uscis.gov&#x2F;working-in-the-united-states&#x2F;permanent...</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.uscis.gov&#x2F;working-in-the-united-states&#x2F;permanent-workers&#x2F;employment-based-immigration-second-preference-eb-2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.uscis.gov&#x2F;working-in-the-united-states&#x2F;permanent...</a> [3] aswell23 is correct that I would qualify for EB-2 based on my BS degree. I had misread the EB-2 requirements. The text originally read: “I’m still two years shy of the 10 year minimum years of experience for EB-2 [2]. So that leaves EB-3.”<p>EDIT: clarify second paragraph with third-person pronouns.<p>EDIT2: clarify based on apwell23’s comment<p>EDIT3: further clarification based on apwell23’s second comment.
评论 #38794458 未加载
评论 #38794941 未加载
评论 #38795567 未加载
评论 #38794359 未加载
TheCaptain4815超过 1 年前
This is a good start, but without solving the elephant in the room (illegal immigration), there will never be the political capital to really make these programs efficient and effective.
评论 #38794992 未加载
syngrog66超过 1 年前
with the massive layoffs of American software folks the last year its a bad time to boost foreign STEM visas. yikes
评论 #38794591 未加载
aiisahik超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m an Australian citizen who has lived in the US for over 20 years, gotten degrees from Yale and Berkeley. I&#x27;ve worked as a software engineer for over 10 years and am currently a cofounder.<p>I&#x27;m so put off by the immigration process in the US that I have decided to leave the US permanently. Don&#x27;t worry - i still work for the same US based company remotely from a more cost effective nation. I just don&#x27;t pay your taxes anymore.
评论 #38794833 未加载
评论 #38794524 未加载
评论 #38794563 未加载
评论 #38794554 未加载
评论 #38794580 未加载
jmyeet超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m a little surprised to see a number of anti-immigraiton comments on this thread, some of which you could describe as reactionary.<p>The US is and always has been a country of immigrants. Your idea of who is and isn&#x27;t an immigrant is simply a question of what time window you choose. In 1800, the US had a population of ~2 million. by 1900 it was ~50 million. You want to guess how itt got that way?<p>Let&#x27;s dispense of the common issues:<p>1. Tech layoffs. This is unrelated to immigration. This is de facto employer colusion to suppress wages. Notice how all the tech companies started doing layoffs at about the same time? The counterargument is &quot;economic conditions&quot;. You may have a point with VC funding drying up due to rising interest rates but many of the biggest companies are massively profitable. Profits tend to fall so they want to suppress costs to maintain profits. That&#x27;s it.<p>I will say that layoffs should basically prohibit you from applying for more work visas for a period. For example: if you&#x27;ve laid off anyone in the last year, sorry you can&#x27;t sponsor a work visa. You can escape this by, say, paying severance of at least a year&#x27;s total compensation. The point is to remove the economic incentive of suppressing wages from the layoff-then-rehire cycle.<p>2. Lowering wages. Restricted immigration actually lowers wages. Why? Because it allows employs to pay undocumented workers less. Poultry farms are an excellent example of this. They pay undocuemnted workers less. If they ever start making noise about wages or conditions, you clear them out by calling in an ICE raid, pay a nominal fine, rinse and repeat.<p>How do we know this? Because when states actually go after employers rather than the workers, it&#x27;s an economic disaster [1].<p>Also, we used to have a temporary worker program for seasonal and agricultural workers called the Bracero program. This filled an economic need. Eliminating it created more undocumented residents because crossing the border became too difficult and expensive.<p>3. A rising tide lifts all boats. There&#x27;s mountains of evidence for this (eg [1]). Unions increase non-union wages. If we didn&#x27;t have wage suppression by forced undocumented workers it would raise wages for everyone.<p>Immigrants aren&#x27;t &quot;stealing your jobs&quot; or &quot;lowering your wages&quot;. There&#x27;s a long history of trying to blame immigrants instead of (correctly) blaming the concerted effort by capital owners to lower your wages.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.americanprogress.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;alabamas-immigration-disaster&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.americanprogress.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;alabamas-immigratio...</a><p>[2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.workrisenetwork.org&#x2F;working-knowledge&#x2F;unions-raise-pay-nonunion-workers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.workrisenetwork.org&#x2F;working-knowledge&#x2F;unions-rai...</a>
评论 #38794503 未加载
评论 #38794621 未加载
评论 #38794424 未加载
评论 #38794943 未加载
评论 #38794328 未加载
评论 #38795611 未加载
评论 #38794852 未加载
评论 #38794296 未加载
评论 #38794399 未加载
matrix87超过 1 年前
This isn&#x27;t bad timing really, we just had a year of layoffs and have a federal election just around the corner. The people who are interested should read up on Trump&#x27;s previous immigration policy, which looks to be considerably more favorable to domestic citizens<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.migrationpolicy.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;trump-h1b-changes-miss-opportunity-real-reform" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.migrationpolicy.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;trump-h1b-changes-miss-...</a>
评论 #38797019 未加载