I reference this paper in almost every science-communication talk I give as an ecologist.<p>It was not a new result by any means, we've had a whole range of other studies showing the same over the last three decades [1]. But it was still a very important study, simply for the sheer amount of data they collated: analysing 170 species trends across four decades across Europe is quite a feat!<p>Taken together, it really drives home the message that modern agricultural practices are shredding the environment, but also that there is a lot of nuance behind biodiversity declines that we need to look into further, and that offer hope for improvement.<p>[1] e.g. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270919000480" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270919000480</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45854-0" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45854-0</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12585,https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13307" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12585,https://doi.org/10.1111/c...</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.006" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00375.x" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00375.x</a>