TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Understanding bridge-based ranking

66 点作者 jwarden超过 1 年前

4 条评论

avivo超过 1 年前
Author here, not of the post, but the linked article, making the case for bridging-based ranking, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.belfercenter.org&#x2F;publication&#x2F;bridging-based-ranking" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.belfercenter.org&#x2F;publication&#x2F;bridging-based-rank...</a> and the related <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bridging.systems&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bridging.systems&#x2F;</a> which lays out a set of open problems and approaches.<p>It&#x27;s great to see this exploration. Those interested might also want to check out <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vitalik.eth.limo&#x2F;general&#x2F;2023&#x2F;08&#x2F;16&#x2F;communitynotes.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vitalik.eth.limo&#x2F;general&#x2F;2023&#x2F;08&#x2F;16&#x2F;communitynotes.h...</a> and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;knightcolumbia.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;the-algorithmic-management-of-polarization-and-violence-on-social-media" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;knightcolumbia.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;the-algorithmic-managemen...</a> (and how aspects of this might be applied to AI governance <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reimagine.aviv.me&#x2F;p&#x2F;governance-of-ai-with-ai-through" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reimagine.aviv.me&#x2F;p&#x2F;governance-of-ai-with-ai-through</a> ).
评论 #38965058 未加载
评论 #38966057 未加载
评论 #38965122 未加载
zug_zug超过 1 年前
Several things I love about this:<p>1. Very interesting concept<p>2. Good explanation<p>3. Love the idea of using algorithms for moderation&#x2F;mediation. Seems to be wildly successful on reddit at its aim (of deprioritizing controversial), and very successful on HN.<p>As as engineer at heart, one thing that would help me get more enthusiastic about this is showing 30 or so example controversial or disputed claims (e.g. who won the election, whatever) and how this algorithm would score various &quot;provided contexts&quot; about them. Of course as a biased individual I can&#x27;t expect 100% agreement, but it would be nice to see if any wild or surprising results come out of this technique.
评论 #38972014 未加载
评论 #38966027 未加载
moomin超过 1 年前
It’s an interesting idea, but I worry about the determination of axes. What if one of the axes is science versus time cube? Feeding versus murdering children? Are these things we want to factor out?
评论 #38966522 未加载
remram超过 1 年前
How many latent attributes per user? Just over?
评论 #38963421 未加载