TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Outline: Self hostable, realtime, Markdown compatible knowledge base

126 点作者 msk-lywenn超过 1 年前

13 条评论

bluish29超过 1 年前
Just be careful that while it is self-hostable and the source is available, it is not open source [1,2]. If this is something important for your consideration before using it.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;outline&#x2F;outline&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;LICENSE">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;outline&#x2F;outline&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;LICENSE</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fossa.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;business-source-license-requirements-provisions-history&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fossa.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;business-source-license-requirements-...</a>
评论 #39018575 未加载
评论 #39014767 未加载
评论 #39015968 未加载
评论 #39015272 未加载
tommoor超过 1 年前
Maintainer here, happy to answer questions and glad to see it get some attention on HN :)<p>Outline is a bootstrapped business. The software is used by thousands of teams, including government agencies, universities, and companies from startups to large corporates.
评论 #39019537 未加载
CrypticShift超过 1 年前
So this is the new generation of Javascript self-hostable wikis inspired by Notion. I remember in the late 2000s, most were PHP-based, with Twiki being an exception: it was Perl-based and also had a powerful wiki&#x2F;database combination [1]. But it was not intuitive to use. That&#x27;s what Notion nailed a decade later.<p>Now All the new (OSS ?) Notion clones like Outline are still deficient in that second database aspect. I hope we are eventually getting there.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twiki.org&#x2F;cgi-bin&#x2F;view&#x2F;Codev&#x2F;StructuredWiki" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twiki.org&#x2F;cgi-bin&#x2F;view&#x2F;Codev&#x2F;StructuredWiki</a>
评论 #39020333 未加载
infecto超过 1 年前
When I was a younger developer I thought tooling solved all problems. As I grew more experience I slowly changed my mind that some problem spaces require not only tooling but process change. I am firmly in the camp that you don&#x27;t need yet another documentation tool. The problem is a human&#x2F;process one, documentation&#x2F;knowledge bases need to be part of the process. As long as you can search it and its easy to update&#x2F;create, I don&#x27;t think the tool is solving much for you.
评论 #39016186 未加载
评论 #39018702 未加载
bityard超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s nowhere near as featureful as Outline, but I wrote my own Markdown knowledge base thingy in Python. It is web-based and geared toward single-user (or _very_ small team use) but it&#x27;s Apache licensed and has no commercial tie-ins. Super easy to deploy as long as you know how to layer some rudimentary authentication on top of it.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cu&#x2F;silicon">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cu&#x2F;silicon</a>
joshfee超过 1 年前
I just spun up a self hosted instance this past weekend, and while its fairly decent it doesn&#x27;t seem to hit the mark compared to Notion (which I use at my day job). There&#x27;s just a bit too much friction in creating pages (you need to click &quot;publish&quot; on every page you create), no &#x2F;page command to quickly jump into a nested page, and.<p>I&#x27;m more excited by Affine (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;affine.pro&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;affine.pro&#x2F;</a>), though their self hosting support seems to be neglected, and it has the same &quot;not actually open source&quot; issue as Outline.
评论 #39018208 未加载
评论 #39017786 未加载
maklu超过 1 年前
Have been using it for over 2 years now, for a team of nearly 80 people. Love it - both self-hosted and as a service. Very quick to respond to issues on github, and the tool keeps evolving.
kkfx超过 1 年前
After years of a personal PIM (in org-mode and experiments with DokuWiki) I&#x27;ve concluded that to manage notes we do need some kind of structure, a free graph will became unmanageable after a certain quantity of notes. That structure is simply a chronology, since the flow of time is a thing common to pretty anything.<p>My actual setup is:<p>- daily notes, meaning when I want to write something I&#x27;ll put in today note, no thinking about where to archive, under a common year root, with a monthly recap;<p>- binders notes, who transclude or link single notes inside a daily one (headings in org-mode lingo) assembling and arranging them as I wish, under a &quot;live archive&quot; root;<p>- not current anymore binders under a &quot;dead archive&quot; root.<p>Such structure so far allow me to store and retrieve pretty anything and always find and consolidate things, something I can&#x27;t do with ZK, LYT, PARA and other common techniques.<p>That&#x27;s to simply say a thing: we do not need the nth wiki style slick UI app but something that offer:<p>- live rendering, like org-mode or even Zim, no separation between source form and rendered form, because that&#x27;s makes easy write and edit things;<p>- transclusion (TiddlyWiki, Dokuwiki+Include plugin (a bit limited), BookStack, org-transclude albeit a bit slow and limited) because to create our library of babel (cfr. Conrad Gessner ~1545 but also many others) we must been able to take atomic notes AND COMPOSE THEM in various ways;<p>- attachment support (a decent one, org-attach it&#x27;s ok, but only because it&#x27;s bare simple so it&#x27;s easy to hijack, Paperless it&#x27;s damn slow but flexible enough and so on);<p>- ability to INTEGRATE anything. In this regard ALL modern software can&#x27;t win, simply because modern systems are designed for commercial reasons, not like classic ones where the OS was a single user-programmable application, and an application is just code added to the OS. The web try to recover DocUIs and composability but it&#x27;s really limited. We can let&#x27;s say link GMail threads in notes, but it&#x27;s far from link a notmuch-accessed local mail linked in org-mode;<p>- offering by default a chronology, even Zim offer that to a certain extent with the builtin calendar.<p>Without the above just write some new and uncertain project fully knowing that migrating contents is far from being easy or granted and it&#x27;s a very painful thing, is IMVHO a waste of time...
Uninen超过 1 年前
Our team quite recently switched from GitLab Wiki to (a self-hosted) Outline.<p>The initial impressions were very good but after using it daily for a couple of months I really don&#x27;t like the default theme(s) (dark nor bright) as the formatting options are very limited and the end result is less readable documents. You can probably tweak these things but we haven&#x27;t gotten there yet.<p>The search is great and you can set explicit &quot;edit mode&quot; in your profile settings so both reading and editong becomes clearer.
msk-lywenn超过 1 年前
It was a mess to set up the first time. It&#x27;s getting better. With been using it for about a year and we&#x27;re very happy with it.
评论 #39013180 未加载
albybisy超过 1 年前
what are other good opensource alternatives?
评论 #39016558 未加载
评论 #39016417 未加载
o_____________o超过 1 年前
What are the advantages over Obisidian?<p>- Team oriented<p>- Integrated with Slack<p>- ?
评论 #39018699 未加载
评论 #39020827 未加载
评论 #39019853 未加载
b2bsaas00超过 1 年前
Could be used to host public pages for tutorials&#x2F;guides for a SaaS?
评论 #39018713 未加载