TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Understanding the world science fiction convention

144 点作者 cstross超过 1 年前

6 条评论

p0w3n3d超过 1 年前
Fun fact: antipope is not an anti-catholic name, according to the site (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.antipope.org&#x2F;charlie&#x2F;old&#x2F;antipope.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.antipope.org&#x2F;charlie&#x2F;old&#x2F;antipope.html</a>)<p>&quot;What sitename do you want?&quot; he asked.<p>I&#x27;d been posting on usenet under the alias &quot;AutoPope -- pontifications by email&quot;. (If you don&#x27;t know what the long word means, go look it up.) So I said, &quot;How about autopope.uucp?&quot;<p>&quot;Okay.&quot; Hic. Burp.<p>And the next day, I was the somewhat bemused owner of a site called antipope.uucp
评论 #39160483 未加载
WBrentWilliams超过 1 年前
I&#x27;ve seen more than a few of these kerfuffle happen now. Other commenters have mentioned other times in other directions that the voting has come out weird.<p>All I can say is that while yes, these awards do matter, they don&#x27;t have to matter as much as you think. At best, all the outcome tells you is what someone else thinks is worth reading. Consider it a starting point. It follows that any given list of nominees is way more important, in terms of gathering a list of books with neat ideas and execution, than a list of winners.
评论 #39161159 未加载
boznz超过 1 年前
The world of book writing is an iceberg, and with thousands of works being released a year that not just go unreviewed but unread there is little chance the awards are inclusive of the genre.<p>We are literally only a GPT generation away from the book writing machines of 1984 and as a new author myself this makes me so sad.
评论 #39166680 未加载
评论 #39234714 未加载
maire超过 1 年前
This article answers one of the questions I had about this year&#x27;s Hugo awards.<p>R. F. Kuang&#x27;s Babel was on many other lists of top book of the year. I was surprised that it did not even on the nomination list. Now I find out that it was pre-emptively removed from the nomination list before the vote!<p>I am not a big fan of Babel (and posted my issues on Goodreads) but I do want the vote to be fair.
评论 #39167564 未加载
senkora超过 1 年前
I think HN may be interested in another recent instance of the Hugo awards running into difficulties because of its rules: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sad_Puppies" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sad_Puppies</a><p>TL;DR: A conservative block of voters swept the nominations for certain categories. At final voting, members voted to not give awards at all in those categories.
评论 #39160370 未加载
评论 #39163191 未加载
评论 #39163045 未加载
评论 #39159621 未加载
评论 #39160515 未加载
PeterStuer超过 1 年前
This reads like an <i>extremely</i> one sided take with a myopic US west coast moralising slant. The author seems oblivious to the irony of calling something <i>world</i>con, then throwing a tantrum if the world does dare not to prostrate to <i>their</i> idiological microbubble.
评论 #39164987 未加载
评论 #39164958 未加载
评论 #39176130 未加载