TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: High performance, low latency IDE suggestions

5 点作者 boronine超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m an IntelliJ user on M2 Mac, I&#x27;ve been testing VS Code out of curiosity and found it a bit slow, even simple things like &quot;go to definition&quot; have annoying latency.<p>Out of pure curiosity, is there any alternative to JetBrains in this regard? I am aware of LSP, but skeptical that it can ever be fast due to its client-server design.<p>Any programming language is fine as long as it has static types.

7 条评论

meekins超过 1 年前
My current primary workstation is very low spec and old compared to a M2 Mac. On that machine Sublime Text is very performant and provides an awesome code writing experience through LSP. I use it as a daily driver with TypeScript, Go and Dart. I try out IntelliJ (or Android Studio) and VSCode occasionally to check out how they are these days but they feel sluggish in comparison.<p>If you need more IDE-like features like running tests and builds or managing for example mobile phone emulators from the editor it requires more fiddling with configuration and plugins but is doable.
RGBCube超过 1 年前
Zed just went OSS, and it is <i>really</i> fast. Check it out: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;</a>
评论 #39142925 未加载
评论 #39142911 未加载
solardev超过 1 年前
Do you find IntelliJ slow? Once mine finishes indexing a project, the rest of the time it feels lighting fast. M2 Max here, 32GB. I think I allocated 16GB to IntelliJ (manually, in the help menu I think). I usually have Webstorm and RubyMine running side by side (for frontend and backend projects) along with a bunch of other apps and browser windows and they all feel really snappy. Hmm. Are your projects huge? Or does Java have a lot more overhead?<p>Jetbrains also offers hosted instances if you want to see if that&#x27;s any faster... <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jetbrains.com&#x2F;space&#x2F;features&#x2F;dev-environments.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jetbrains.com&#x2F;space&#x2F;features&#x2F;dev-environments.ht...</a><p>(I haven&#x27;t tried it, but it seems to me that network latency at 30-100ms shouldn&#x27;t be as noticeable as a slow computer, if that&#x27;s really the issue)
评论 #39160557 未加载
kwant_kiddo超过 1 年前
I have not found a better &#x27;true&#x27; IDE experience than JetBrains. Once it has done it&#x27;s thing, it works pretty good. If your projects are big like a C++ codebase +2mil LOC then well the latency is going to suffer.<p>If you count VSCode as an IDE then I would suggest neovim with an LSP and a fuzzy finder. It is the fastest&#x2F;best dev setup I have experienced for most things.<p>If you are very latency sensitive I am afraid an IDE&#x2F;&#x27;smart&#x27;-editor may not be for you. Then I again would consider some lightweight editor that has fuzzy search and no intellisense.
sgt超过 1 年前
I don&#x27;t think the client&#x2F;server design of LSP is a limiting factor itself. That said, nothing seems to beat JetBrains these days so I am also on that wagon.
zerr超过 1 年前
For Java, the fastest editor&#x2F;IDE used to be JCreator. At that time, the only Java IDE made with native&#x2F;C++ tech. Sadly, it is abandoned.
uaas超过 1 年前
I am satisfied with my various language specific neovim configs. There’s some upfront cost, though.