TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Update Reveals AI Will Read All Your Private Messages

89 点作者 furkansahin超过 1 年前

17 条评论

thisisauserid超过 1 年前
From the app:<p>&quot;The Google Messages app creates suggestions with technology that’s built into your device. This way, your conversations stay in the Google Messages app. They aren’t sent to the Google Assistant or Google servers.&quot;
评论 #39176420 未加载
nolist_policy超过 1 年前
What a weird article, it doesn&#x27;t clarify anything.<p>It tries to lead you into thinking that every RCS message is read by Bard on Google servers in clear-text, without e2e encryption. When it is only chats with the Bard chatbot that are readable by Google, for obvious reasons.<p>Then the article talks more about Apple than Google.<p>Also the author seems to be querying Bard for original information without double-checking.<p>This is the reason why Google is so hesitant, anything they do will be used against them.<p>Sorry for this bad comment, but this seems to be a Gish gallop situation so I want to get over it as quickly as possible.
skywhopper超过 1 年前
This author is asking Google&#x27;s chatbot, Bard, about this feature and reporting it as if its responses are fact. It is incredibly irresponsible to present quotes from Bard as fact or as official Google communication. It ends up making for a very confusing article (complete with a multi-paragraph late addition with more non-fact-based speculation about Apple features that might or might not be coming nine months from now?!) that has absolutely no useful information.<p>As for what has actually been announced (LLM-based writing assistance within Google Messages), do people actually want chatbots to write their text messages for them? I certainly don&#x27;t. But what a terrible world we&#x27;ll be living in if &quot;AI&quot; anti-features like this take hold. Next to no real-world utility from LLM tech, but just one more layer of inhumanity injected into our worsening communication. This is a sure way to send messages you don&#x27;t mean, but it&#x27;s even worse because there&#x27;s probably another LLM on the other end, summarizing all meaning and personality out of the messages anyway. So all text-based human communication will soon be reduced to a neverending string of misunderstandings thanks to the LLM-telephone game happening between you and your contacts.
nerdjon超过 1 年前
We desperately need a way for the people you communicate with to be able to OPT IN (not out, out should be default) of companies looking at your communications.<p>As an iPhone user who has removed Google as much as possible out of my life, I have basically zero control over what happens with my messages when I send it to people on Android. Same with email, my contact information (particularly if they just allow any app to get their contacts), etc.<p>Put simply we are beyond the point that just because information is on your phone that it means all of it is &quot;your&quot; information and you alone can consent to it.<p>Particularly if it&#x27;s sensitive texts, photos, whatever. But it shouldn&#x27;t matter how sensitive it is.
评论 #39176168 未加载
otteromkram超过 1 年前
1. Forbes is a terrible news source. 2. If you&#x27;re a Gmail user, Google also reads your emails, do this isn&#x27;t new ground being covered.
mechhacker超过 1 年前
Really needs to be a bill of rights issue to not have every human communication read by an outside entity, including robots, &quot;private&quot; or not.<p>Both 3rd and 4th amendment apply.<p>&quot;No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner o be prescribed by law.&quot; The soldier being Google and the house being my phone.
评论 #39175988 未加载
评论 #39176125 未加载
评论 #39176062 未加载
sunnysogra超过 1 年前
In my opinion, Forbes is not a reliable source. Additionally, every email and document sent through Google essentially grants them permission to extract ad-targeting information. Furthermore, data stored on Google Cloud and SaaS hosted at These days, No document is safe and private on internet.
FergusArgyll超过 1 年前
The source for this claim is, Bard?
评论 #39175975 未加载
评论 #39176079 未加载
评论 #39176239 未加载
keshavatearth超过 1 年前
Very poor article.<p>9to5&#x27;s leak shows an option of chatting to bard in google messages and this article takes that to make the point that all your messages will be shared with Google.<p>reference article: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;9to5google.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;01&#x2F;18&#x2F;google-messages-bard&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;9to5google.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;01&#x2F;18&#x2F;google-messages-bard&#x2F;</a> This is more like those indie tools that send message to chatgpt from your texts app.<p>And that&#x27;s gonna be not-encrypted anyway.
raziel2p超过 1 年前
This only affects the Messages app, right? I only use this for SMS, which means never at all. Still not a great precedent, though.
评论 #39175644 未加载
评论 #39175814 未加载
zeroCalories超过 1 年前
Any recommendations for privacy respecting smartphones?
评论 #39175884 未加载
评论 #39175868 未加载
ChrisArchitect超过 1 年前
[dupe]<p>More here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39159527">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39159527</a>
beastman82超过 1 年前
In other words, the _offline_ &#x2F; device-based AI will help you write texts and save you time.
candiddevmike超过 1 年前
How do I turn it off?
评论 #39175945 未加载
评论 #39175958 未加载
noworld超过 1 年前
&quot;Google, give me a list of usernames of [x political persuasion].&quot;
WhackyIdeas超过 1 年前
Google really are the absolute monsters in this world.<p>Great, so now we won’t even be able to have a choice around having our private messages off their AI surveillance machine for the Five Eyes… because just the mere sending a message to someone who has an Android could be doing this.<p>Buckle up folks, one day the Trump Junta or their descendants will be using Google’s SurveilAI tech to come for all you true Trump haters (incl me!)
评论 #39176147 未加载
api超过 1 年前
Of course it will, and all your e-mails and all your personal and company documents. You should think of anything going through Google as &quot;I am giving this to Google to profile me and extract ad targeting information.&quot;<p>I bet they crawl the Google Cloud block and object storage volumes and extract information too, which means that all SaaS hosted at Google is probably mined by Google. That would be my expectation unless the contract contains very specific non-weasel-worded language prohibiting this. Any company that does ads or ad-tech as a significant part of their revenue is guilty of maximal privacy invasion unless proven innocent.