TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Beliefs That Kill Birth Rates

20 点作者 barry-cotter超过 1 年前

7 条评论

jpm_sd超过 1 年前
Children used to be the inevitable outcome of sexual relationships, now they are expensive luxury items. </father of 3>
friend_and_foe超过 1 年前
From the comments of the article:<p>&gt; A possible link would be that more progressive countries have more immigrants from places with higher fertility rates, and these immigrants are the ones pushing the TFR up.<p>Seems to me that this factor, when you can bring yourself to ignore the controversy of implied adjacent ideas, is one that can&#x27;t be ignored if we want to understand the dynamics of culture, economics and fertility. To say that a liberal culture has a higher fertility rate is to ignore that liberal cultures often import populations from very conservative cultures. It&#x27;s possible that the cultural differences between the European populations are negligible that if immigrant fertility were taken into account the line of best fit in these graphs would be flat. Or they could be inverse, or similar, we just don&#x27;t know. But to ignore the possible effect is to not seriously strive to understand this dynamic.
throwaway167超过 1 年前
I was disappointed that the author hadn&#x27;t done a literature review, even a basic one. Perhaps they&#x27;re an expert and didn&#x27;t see the need, but they didn&#x27;t cite anything or provide any further reading.<p>And it&#x27;s not like this subject isn&#x27;t researched.<p>There&#x27;s so much [1] [2] that a literature review might be a really good place to start.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scholar.google.com&#x2F;scholar?hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0%2C5&amp;q=birthrate&amp;btnG=" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scholar.google.com&#x2F;scholar?hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0%2C5&amp;q=birt...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ideas.repec.org&#x2F;cgi-bin&#x2F;htsearch?form=extended&amp;wm=wrd&amp;dt=range&amp;ul=&amp;q=birthrate&amp;cmd=Search%21&amp;wf=4BFF&amp;s=R&amp;db=&amp;de=" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ideas.repec.org&#x2F;cgi-bin&#x2F;htsearch?form=extended&amp;wm=wr...</a><p>A further article, without using data to demonstrate normative hypotheses but also with visualisations, is this: [3]<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ourworldindata.org&#x2F;fertility-rate?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aarticle%7Csection%3Amain_content%7Cbutton%3Abody_link">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ourworldindata.org&#x2F;fertility-rate?source=content_typ...</a>
moffkalast超过 1 年前
I would be really surprised if it&#x27;s just one core issue to point at, there&#x27;s a ludicrously long list of perfectly reasonable factors that all do their part. These graphs barely show any correlation at all, much less any causation.
082349872349872超过 1 年前
See also <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;R&#x2F;K_selection_theory" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;R&#x2F;K_selection_theory</a><p>(compare &quot;The Sow &amp; The Lioness&quot;)<p>It is much easier to argue that <i>H sapiens</i> is a K-selected species, than that we ought be an r-selected species.
评论 #39182030 未加载
pyrale超过 1 年前
Looks like some people are still looking for a root cause.
johnea超过 1 年前
Whatever it is, I hope it keeps on working.<p>There is no rational argument that the current human population shouldn&#x27;t be reduced.
评论 #39184476 未加载
评论 #39184820 未加载
评论 #39184693 未加载