TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Global fertility isn't just declining, it's collapsing

54 点作者 amin超过 1 年前

22 条评论

questinthrow超过 1 年前
To be honest I live in one of the most pampered eras doing the cushiest job from home. But even so I dont understand how people motivate themselves to make children, especially if they have a 1-2 hour commute and are forced by debt to take on shittier jobs than mine (probably 99% of jobs out there). Why even do this for 60 years and also condemn your kids to the same thing? It might seem like bragging but I basically won the game and I dont see anything worth it up here. I guess the struggle is what gives you meaning or something and children can be your cope because they will have a better life than yours if yours sucks.
评论 #39190863 未加载
评论 #39193931 未加载
评论 #39199485 未加载
评论 #39190926 未加载
评论 #39190957 未加载
评论 #39190671 未加载
评论 #39190820 未加载
评论 #39197659 未加载
评论 #39190753 未加载
评论 #39190979 未加载
评论 #39193103 未加载
评论 #39191029 未加载
评论 #39197204 未加载
评论 #39191282 未加载
评论 #39191343 未加载
评论 #39191056 未加载
评论 #39190840 未加载
SamuelAdams超过 1 年前
Why does the global population need to grow? What is wrong with only having 9 billion people instead of 10 billion?
评论 #39190738 未加载
评论 #39190719 未加载
评论 #39190793 未加载
评论 #39191259 未加载
评论 #39190894 未加载
评论 #39190723 未加载
评论 #39190824 未加载
stephc_int13超过 1 年前
Am I the only one seeing the intricate relationship between population growth and the housing market? When the population grows, the housing price increases, and at some point it becomes too difficult for young couples to have extra rooms to raise kids (many still live with their parents). When the population decreases or collapses, the housing market crashes, and then, one or two generations later, the population increases again. The thing is that we've been accustomed to a quick and unprecedented population growth since the end of WW2, and the housing market of big cities are reaching its limits all over the world. My take is that it won't be a problem, au contraire, the population will stabilize around 10B, and this is a good thing on many dimensions. Think about it.
评论 #39199803 未加载
评论 #39191077 未加载
评论 #39190850 未加载
Flatcircle超过 1 年前
As the trend continues the book children of men becomes more and more prescient.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Children_of_Men" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Children_of_Men</a>
sanitycheck超过 1 年前
So, looks like the &quot;problem&quot; is that by 2080 we&#x27;ll be back to the same global population we have now? Perhaps that&#x27;s good news, we&#x27;ll have to learn how to live sustainably instead of basing everything on constant growth.<p>Also, global surface temperature will probably be around 2°C higher, sea levels will have risen maybe a metre, and we&#x27;ll have been really lucky if large portions of the planet aren&#x27;t a nuclear wasteland by then. At least we won&#x27;t have to worry about overpopulation!
slashdev超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m not sure why this gets flagged, because it&#x27;s very interesting and concerns all of us.<p>I think it&#x27;s great, in my mind, there&#x27;s too many people on the planet already, and we&#x27;re stressing the biospehere near the breaking point in multiple ways.<p>9-10 billion people is plenty. This news is a welcome bit of good news in an otherwise scary future.
评论 #39190804 未加载
评论 #39199887 未加载
评论 #39190980 未加载
r0ckarong超过 1 年前
So at what point can we point at the few percent that are stacking wealth while the rest is too busy surviving to keep the species alive? I&#x27;m ready.<p>My wife and I make good money, by no means riches, and I&#x27;m all but done with the idea of trying for a second child. I don&#x27;t even know how to take care of the first one if things keep getting shitter at this pace.
slaw超过 1 年前
&gt; There were 134 million babies born in 2023.<p>&gt; There were 61 million people who died in 2023.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ourworldindata.org&#x2F;births-and-deaths">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ourworldindata.org&#x2F;births-and-deaths</a>
评论 #39190669 未加载
评论 #39190679 未加载
HPsquared超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s not everywhere. North Korea has higher fertility than South Korea, for instance. See population pyramids:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Demographics_of_South_Korea" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Demographics_of_South_Korea</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Demographics_of_North_Korea" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Demographics_of_North_Korea</a>
happiness_idx超过 1 年前
Why should we care? We can supplement a new tax base with removal of the border. I won&#x27;t fall for the nationalist trap that, &quot;my people being born on soil is magically better than people from over seas&quot;. Its never made sense to me why we need more children. Additionally we probably need a degrowth mindset in general in order to combat over consumption, and man-made climate change.
评论 #39191270 未加载
whalesalad超过 1 年前
Is fertility being conflated with birthrate &#x2F; desire or ability to have kids? I do believe fertility is declining due to environmental factors (pesticides, seed oils, etc) and autism is spiking out of control ... but I also think that a lot of younger generations are just choosing not to have children.
评论 #39190901 未加载
coffeebeqn超过 1 年前
I can’t help but to think about the Population Bomb hysteria. This time in reverse!
orwin超过 1 年前
Just a remark about birth rate *85 method: the author isn&#x27;t taking into account that women are having children later.<p>Sadly real fertility statistics are doomed to be late by 40 years, which is way too late, so we have to be satisfied by birthrate, but if I had to calculate the real fertility rate of a country, I would take the number of children per infertile women over 16 or something like that.<p>Its not political, I&#x27;m not saying anybody&#x27;s right or wrong, I just wanted to geek on fertility statistics
waldothedog超过 1 年前
To clarify for myself… humans aren’t losing the physical capacity to reproduce? It’s that we aren’t reproducing as much due to choice&#x2F;circumstance?
评论 #39190870 未加载
评论 #39190816 未加载
hogepiyo超过 1 年前
&quot;Birth rate&quot; probably would have been the better term to use in the article title if you ask me, but then I suppose it wouldn&#x27;t have the whole alarmist children of men angle behind it.
rrssh超过 1 年前
That&#x27;s the same thing.
评论 #39190688 未加载
liveoneggs超过 1 年前
Finally some good news!
评论 #39190828 未加载
spants超过 1 年前
Interested to know the following: 1) The delta change over time for the regions. As countries with typically larger familes have access to better healthcare, it should have increased. 2) the delta change for countries plotted with covid vaccination acceptance.
reportgunner超过 1 年前
OK and ?
oldpersonintx超过 1 年前
In the US, having kids is for the top 1% who can afford it or the bottom 5% who have always been poor.<p>Want to fix this in the US? Offer stable child-rearing families FREE housing, and I mean in decent neighborhoods. I don&#x27;t mean a stipend or low-interest loan, I mean FREE including utilities, maintenance and property tax. You will see strollers everywhere within two years.
评论 #39190681 未加载
评论 #39190668 未加载
评论 #39190721 未加载
评论 #39191011 未加载
评论 #39190647 未加载
评论 #39190835 未加载
评论 #39190660 未加载
评论 #39190750 未加载
评论 #39190759 未加载
评论 #39199932 未加载
评论 #39192238 未加载
评论 #39191002 未加载
评论 #39190656 未加载
评论 #39190869 未加载
评论 #39190666 未加载
评论 #39190727 未加载
officeplant超过 1 年前
I for one welcome our new childless overlords.
1over137超过 1 年前
Our planet is seriously overpopulated (with humans), so this is good news.
评论 #39190785 未加载