TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ubuntu Generic vs. Low-Latency Linux Kernel Benchmarks for HPC and Desktop

26 点作者 scns超过 1 年前

4 条评论

techbro92超过 1 年前
I skimmed through the tests in the benchmark and it seems like they’re testing based on throughput and I didn’t see any tests specifically to measure latency. It would have been really useful to see that.
评论 #39213409 未加载
a-french-anon超过 1 年前
Was discussed before these (mostly throughput) benchmarks in <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39173229">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39173229</a>
m463超过 1 年前
&gt; <i>Most of the differences were within the Stress-NG kernel micro-benchmarks, which is to be expected.</i><p>&quot;to be expected&quot; with no explanation.<p>What makes this benchmark perform so poorly with the rt kernel?
charcircuit超过 1 年前
If the system could detect when low latency is important they could get away with a single kernel. Or even simply enable low latency by default for the desktop version of ubuntu.
评论 #39213075 未加载
评论 #39213744 未加载
评论 #39213338 未加载