The judge granted a motion to dismiss (ruling [1]). There were two major issues:<p>1. The judge ruled Disney lacked standing to because it failed to show injury, particularly regarding the Florida Commerce Department; and<p>2. The judge also ruled that a binding precedent from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals says that an otherwise constitutional law cannot be challenged on First Amendment grounds. This was news to me. If you're interested the case is In re: Mike Hubbard, No. 13-10281 (11th Cir. 2015) [2].<p>Disney has indicated they will appeal. I'm intersted to see how this goes because Florida's actions were clearly retaliatory.<p>I find (2) particularly interesting because the legislation was clearly retaliatory<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Dismissal-Order.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Dismissal-O...</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/13-10281/13-10281-2015-10-14.html" rel="nofollow">https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/1...</a>