> “They’re not able to collect, and then they don’t pay you because they would have paid you based on the appointment that you conducted. Right? But because they were not able to collect because they were so inefficient, you end up not getting paid.”<p>I wonder if this is legally wage theft? Based on my layman's quick reading I think yes in California, but no federally unless it brings you below minimum wage. Imagine if you're a factory worker, and the warehouse storing all the widgets burns down. So they tell you that they're retroactively not paying you for last month's labor because they lost the product of it, independent of anything you did.