TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The New Luddites Aren't Backing Down

8 点作者 cainxinth超过 1 年前

3 条评论

jauntywundrkind超过 1 年前
&gt; <i>&quot;I very much identify as a Luddite,&quot; Dubal said. &quot;This doesn’t mean I am against technology. It means I am against dispossession.&quot;</i><p>Very nicely put.<p>I&#x27;m proud that there are some forefronts for pro-user pro-human technology out there.<p>RFC8890 <i>The Internet Is For End Users</i> is a beautifully staked position that should inform &amp; guide other works. The open web &amp; JSON endpoints have a strong democratizing strength, that the user-agent&#x2F;browser makes real every day with extensions &amp; userscripts.<p>The industrial purposes of machines ought be secondary to a holistic ability of humans to possess &amp; work the machines around them. We can iterate &amp; change &amp; evolve the world as people, as opposed to having it shaped &amp; formed to trap us inside. There&#x27;s efforts like Malleable Systems Collective whose central purpose is this adaptability, this ability to to shape systems. It feels like a <i>spiritual</i> calling to me, like a semi-invosible battle we are all in to enable or suppress human will.
Vvector超过 1 年前
Technology has always destroyed jobs and industries, all the way back to Ned Ludd. But it created new jobs and made us more efficient. Otherwise, 90% of us would be farmers.<p>It is unclear to me why any specific industry should receive special protection from technology. Should we ban bread factories to protect the jobs of local bakers? If one was to draw a line, what would be the criteria?<p>On a side note, we are hearing about this much more now, because the journalists and artists have a louder voice than the bakers.
goles超过 1 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;oarRc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;oarRc</a>