TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Yulia Navalnaya’s X account was suspended

113 点作者 nickcotter大约 1 年前

17 条评论

belter大约 1 年前
&quot;X social media platform restores account of Navalny’s widow, Yulia Navalnaya, after brief suspension&quot; - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;02&#x2F;20&#x2F;x-suspends-account-of-navalnys-widow-yulia-navalnaya.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;02&#x2F;20&#x2F;x-suspends-account-of-navaln...</a>
SilverBirch大约 1 年前
This is probably a bit of a nothing story. It&#x27;s an easy tactic for companies like twitter to minimize their workload simply by saying &quot;Hey, for an average account, if it gets a tonne of reports, we just auto-suspend it&quot;. Is this open to abuse? Sure. Will it get worked out after a day or two? Probably. These social networks are full of hacks like these to try to reduce the user:moderator ratio to below 1:1.
评论 #39441140 未加载
gerjomarty大约 1 年前
Not passing judgement on this at all, but just giving you another data point.<p>Every so often, Hololive, a famous Virtual YouTuber agency, debuts a new set of talents by introducing their biographies and Twitter accounts. Because they&#x27;re so popular, they get an influx of hundreds of thousands of new followers over the course of a day or two after only tweeting once. A large number of these new accounts get restricted because of automated systems assuming it&#x27;s a bot, when actually it&#x27;s legitimate excitement and&#x2F;or network effects.
andsoitis大约 1 年前
Doesn’t look suspended to me: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;yulia_navalnaya" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;yulia_navalnaya</a>
评论 #39444381 未加载
fynis大约 1 年前
Just a single day after showing up on the platform. Did she even get to post a single thing? This screams absolute non-sense to me, and for her safety she probably could really use the spotlight of all big platforms.
评论 #39440999 未加载
评论 #39440986 未加载
TrackerFF大约 1 年前
Did she break the X ToS?<p>Did Russian state actors compromise her account?<p>Inside job?<p>EDIT: Or mass reporting &#x2F; brigading?<p>With the publicity of this, I don&#x27;t think it will remain suspended for long - unless it turns out she somehow broke some rules...that said, I&#x27;d be amazed if she&#x27;s not under 24&#x2F;7 electronic surveillance by Russian state.
评论 #39440858 未加载
评论 #39440863 未加载
评论 #39441043 未加载
eggy大约 1 年前
Probably an automated algorithm as they said back in the Dorsey days even when he refused to confirm why it didn&#x27;t auto-populate a user&#x27;s search box with Republicans as much as Democrats during his 2018 testimony. I didn&#x27;t know squat about Navalny except for a blurb about him on some news show a while back. It didn&#x27;t discuss his far-right extremist affiliations then, which he supposedly gave up many years ago, or his xenophobia with immigration views.
guax大约 1 年前
I think X would benefit from having a verification system for public figures where mass report would lead to manual review instead of insta ban etc. it could double up as a way for people to know they&#x27;re following the real person.
评论 #39447870 未加载
Baguette5242大约 1 年前
At some point, someone needs to explain to me why political and&#x2F;or public figures are still active and using this garbage platform. I would understand this if we were like in 2005~2010 when Facebook, Twitter and co. were at the top of the hype and where centralization was not a big concern for anyone, but nowadays, with all the red flags, all the shit show and all the alternatives that there are... I really don&#x27;t get it.
评论 #39441027 未加载
评论 #39440926 未加载
评论 #39441093 未加载
评论 #39441236 未加载
评论 #39441080 未加载
评论 #39443213 未加载
评论 #39441175 未加载
评论 #39440946 未加载
bartimus大约 1 年前
The good thing is her account went from ~100K to nearly 300K followers since this incident.
drooopy大约 1 年前
I guess that the FSB has some kind of &quot;kompromat&quot; on fake tony stark?
评论 #39440953 未加载
评论 #39442062 未加载
评论 #39441107 未加载
评论 #39441047 未加载
评论 #39441688 未加载
评论 #39441270 未加载
评论 #39440966 未加载
gryn大约 1 年前
so much for buying the platform to allow for free speech.
1letterunixname大约 1 年前
Tyranny of silicon capitalism consuming the public commons. It&#x27;s like a house with an HOA, only 1e9x worse.
rsynnott大约 1 年前
&gt; It is unclear why her account has been suspended by the social network, formerly Twitter - which is owned by Elon Musk.<p>I see what you did there, Sky News.
SubiculumCode大约 1 年前
This is my final straw.
评论 #39441084 未加载
joak大约 1 年前
Fake news, the account is not suspended.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;yulia_navalnaya" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;yulia_navalnaya</a>
评论 #39441150 未加载
Pigalowda大约 1 年前
I’m reminded of when Musk had the Ukrainian sea drones disabled in the middle of an attack because they were using Starlink terminals. He didn’t choose to warn them prior or disable before they launched. He had them disabled after launch so they lost the terminal and the drone.<p>Here he times the suspension at a critical time when she has begun making statements about taking up where her husband left off and she has a lot of world attention.<p>As an historical comparison, even Crassus died trying to increase the power of Rome. He was doing it for his own prestige and power but it was mutual nevertheless. Crassus failed spectacularly and had molten gold poured over his head after his son was killed and legions destroyed.<p>I don’t want Musk’s family to suffer but I would like to see him go to Mars.
评论 #39441127 未加载
评论 #39466416 未加载
评论 #39440940 未加载
评论 #39440957 未加载
评论 #39440883 未加载