TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Paragraph Pollution: AI is (probably) greener than you typing on a laptop

3 点作者 tomjohnneill超过 1 年前

3 条评论

TheLoafOfBread超过 1 年前
Random text generator is even greener than AI and me typing. Does not mean that result is understandable or even coherent.
dartos超过 1 年前
Pretty shallow analysis.<p>How much energy was used for training chat gpt 2,3 and 4?<p>Also<p>&gt; We’ll assume that AI models have roughly the same split of operating costs as a typical data centre<p>I don’t think this is a good assumption. GPT is not a typical application, it requires a massive amount of power hungry GPUs.<p>It’d be better to compare the power cost to non-asic crypto mining farms.
评论 #39480036 未加载
rsynnott超过 1 年前
Do people actually use gpt-3.5 turbo? Full-fat gpt-4 is 40 times more expensive...
评论 #39480896 未加载