While I think most of the logos it generates are visually appealing, I think they tend to be to complicated. I want to use my logo e.g. as a favicon too and it needs to be "smart but simple" for that purpose.<p>I also found it hard to refine. I liked some of the logos and thought it would be great to improve upon them, but when using the "adjust" feature, what it creates is often quite different in style.<p>Maybe it would be great to have some form of visual input. E.g. generate 10 different styles based on an input and then ask the user which styles he likes best and go further in that direction. Or some other kind of parameters, e.g. colorfulness, rather uses lines or filled shapes, ... Even an upload "I like this logo, but change xy about it/Let this inspire you".<p>I'm also not sure about the pricing. I actually bought one month because I like to play with stuff and also like to support indie-dev stuff. But I don't think any of the logos I got out was "production ready" for my use and I probably won't use them for real. From that perspective, 29$ is quite much. And I don't need multiple logos for different stuff a month. On the other hand it's understandable you can't let people generate a large number of logos before spending anything. I think for me personally a credit-based model would be a better fit. Happy to spend some $ and have the possibility to come back in some months when I feel I need a logo again.<p>That's probably a temporary thing but the Sign in with Google shows some URL that seems internal.